Sentences with phrase «appears as statement»

Cash back that you earn appears as statement credit automatically on future statements.
25 % in - flight discount — The 25 % discount appears as a statement credit 6 - 8 weeks after the transaction is posted to the account.
The 25 % in - flight discount appears as a statement credit 6 - 8 weeks after the transaction posts to your account.
However, you have to spend at least $ 75 on the same day you open your account, and then the $ 25 bonus appears as a statement credit on your account within 1 to 2 billing periods.
Cash back: Appears as a statement credit in $ 25 increments.
Reward appears as statement credit 8 to 12 weeks after it is earned.
Cashback will appear as a statement credit within two billing cycles.
The discount will appear as a statement credit on your credit card bill.
Savings will appear as a statement credit 6 - 8 weeks after the transaction is posted to the Card Member's Card account.
Cardmember is entitled to one (1) Annual Travel Credit each calendar year, towards a single travel booking of $ 200 or more, and will appear as a statement credit on the Platinum Cardmember's billing statement as «Platinum Annual Travel Credit».
After that, you had to wait for the hotel charge to come through, and then the cost of the fourth night to appear as a statement credit.
It may appear as a statement of self praise, but it is an effective form of objective writing and works best for mid level career candidates and professionals:

Not exact matches

«Renca is not a paradise, as some would wrongly like to make it appear,» a statement from the Brazillian government said, according to Reuters.
Items that you'll need to include in the cash - flow statement and the order in which they should appear are as follows:
On a standard accounting income statement, such a reduction in cash would not appear right away, but rather only be counted as an expense until the t - shirts were not only received, but sold.
Even if cross-border transactions are presented in the customer's currency, they may still be charged a foreign exchange fee by their issuer, which appears as a separate line item on their credit card statement.
There are things that take cash out of the business that don't classify as expenses and therefore don't appear on your profit and loss statement.
China and the European Union are set to issues a statement at a high - level meeting in Brussels committing to implement the climate deal, in a effort to bolster the pact as Trump appears set to abandon it.
It would appear that CFTC chairman J. Christopher Giancarlo's statements did not allay fears, as Futures Industry Association president Walter Lukken, penned an open letter to express concerns regarding cryptocurrency derivatives.
The Fed's monetary policy statement in July contained upbeat language that appeared to open the door to a rate hike as early as its next meeting in September.
Unless you indicate otherwise, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card will vote your Shares: FOR the election of each of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement; FOR the ratification of E&Y as Walmart's independent accountants for fiscal 2014; FOR the non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the company's NEOs; FOR the approval of the Management Incentive Plan, as amended; and AGAINST each of the shareholder proposals appearing in this proxy statement.
The comments appeared to contradict statements made by Trump several weeks ago, when he said he didn't know about the payment to porn actress Stormy Daniels as part of a nondisclosure agreement she signed days before the presidential election.
Responding in a statement to The Canadian Press, the U.S. Lumber Coalition said: «It is our understanding that there is no agreement as Canada still appears unable to have a cohesive position that is consistent with their commitment in 2016 to an «at or below market share» or quota agreement construct... An «at or below market share» agreement... by definition is a clean quota agreement.»
The discount will appear as a credit on the following billing statement.
I think the message «we haven't thought this through» was heard by the Gap since I read recently that they also retracted the statement put out by Forest Ethics... it appears they are not boycotting Alberta oil so much as trying to source greener energy.
Subsequently, on January 23, 2017, the company announced that the prior press release had contained inaccurate statements, as it appears that the investigation was «directed by Company management rather than any subset of independent directors».
It tells managers, investors, and other stakeholders the percentage of revenue / sales remaining after subtracting the cost of goods sold; the amount of money left over to pay selling, general, and administrative expenses such as salaries, research and development, and marketing, which appear further down the income statement.
When you are charged an annual fee, typically it will appear as a charge to your account on your first billing statement after opening your account and each subsequent cardmember year.
While the central forecast for underlying inflation remains similar to that provided in February, the risks around this outlook now appear more evenly balanced, rather than on the upside as indicated in previous Statements.
It would appear that Mr. Galvin is running with that train of thought at the state level as, in his statement, he said «An offering done to avoid registration with regulators should be seen as a red flag, and you should contact my office before investing».
Merchant discounts appear as credits on your checking account statement.
You seem to believe that you are aware of what everyone is thinking, as this is the second time you have made a sweeping blanket statement... but to answer your question: I can assure you if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be...
He appeared to suggest that timing of the payment was connected to the contentious presidential election, contradicting Mr. Trump's Twitter statements, as well as his own.
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes Cameron Winklevoss and Tyler Winklevoss, and each of them singly, his true and lawful attorneys - in - fact with full power to sign on behalf of such person, in the capacities indicated below, any and all amendments to this registration statement and any subsequent related registration statement filed pursuant to Rule 462 (b) under the Securities Act of 1933, and generally to do all such things in the name and on behalf of such person, in the capacities indicated below, to enable the Registrant to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933 and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, hereby ratifying and confirming the signature of such person as it may be signed by said attorneys - in - fact, or any of them, on any and all amendments to this registration statement or any such subsequent related registration statement.
Your statement appears to want it both ways, if we do good acts because of a fear of God, would more or equal amount of us do bad acts because of a fear of God as well?
These comments appeared to me to be a bit pejorative as there was no attempt at biblical refutation or even explanation of the context of your statements.
One's work is theology even if one ignores all earlier statements and begins only with the way things appear to him from that perspective which he acknowledges as given to him in some community of shared life and conviction.
So, let me give a possible paraphrase of the last part of Good's statement above, as it appears to me.
In treating so wide a range of problems as appear in this study, adequate documentation and scholarly support of the statements made would require erudition that the author can not claim.
This statement, as well as the whole account of the reproduction of actual entities, appears to support those who see in his doctrine merely a transfer of character (cf. D. Emmet; see note 1).
I never said that I agreed with the statement however it does appear to me as well that most atheists that I have met personally do have a leanings to the left politically and are generally secularists as well.
This answer is not implied in the statement of the question, as it might seem to be, for God's relation to man as the eternal Thou which never becomes an It does not make any the less real the «silence» or «eclipse» of God when He appears to hide Himself and we cut ourselves off from relation with Him.
His confession may be used as evidence against him «if it appear that same was freely made without compulsion or persuasion» and he waives «knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily» the rights previously mentioned, prior to and during the making of the statement.
I would suggest that next time you make a statement that is bordering on if not actually libelous against an honoured military veteran that you at least have the balls to show you full name and not appear as «Gary».
But, in spite of what would appear to be the plain meaning of such statements, Paul can not be regarded as an adoptionist.
It is that in responding to the excesses of contemporary liberalism and progressivism, as well as to Rationalism when it appears among conservatives, we ought not to compete on Rationalist terms, as if yet another mission statement or manifesto or policy could save us.
As I currently understand, you would want to understand «opinion», «defamation», and these three concepts: «a true statement» vs a «false statement», a public person (there appear to be different types), and acting with «malice».
There are, however, greater difficulties with what appear to be the simplest statements about the physical world, the ones most often taken as paradigmatic by those who deny correspondence.
Finally, the nonmythological core is constituted by the statement of the justification of faith which appears consequently as the Gospel in the Gospel.
Such a statement is problematic, at least inasmuch as it is incompatible with the concept of God as primordial and consequent natures that appears at other places in Process and Reality, particularly in the last part of the book.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z