Sentences with phrase «appellant challenges the decision»

Not exact matches

The modification of a previous decision to worsen the situation of an appellant is deemed very controversial in Brazil (reformatio in pejus) and may be challenged in courts, even though the CRSFN has already given some decisions in that sense.

Persuaded trial court to dismiss appeal for lack of standing where appellant challenged the Connecticut Siting Council authorization to build and operate a telecommunications facility in northwest Connecticut; successfully defended that decision and numerous other issues raised on appeal at the Connecticut Appellate Court and the Connecticut Supreme Court.

Instead, in what is apparently dictum, given its decision to reverse appellant's conviction on the basis of the first due process claim, the Court maintains that a separate due process challenge by appellant arising from the Ohio Supreme Court's addition of a scienter element is procedurally barred, because appellant failed to object at trial to the absence of a scienter instruction.

The appellant, Carolyne Willow of Article 39, had challenged an Upper Tribunal decision upholding the Ministry of Justice's refusal to disclose a training manual on the restraint of 12 - 17 year olds in custody.

Critically, challenges to tribunal decisions must be lodged within five days of the posting to the appellant of the tribunal decision, i.e. immediately: so if that's your issue, get counsel now.

Acted for the Claimants / Appellants in their challenge under the Public Contracts Regulations to the Government's decision to abolish the competitive market for childcare voucher services in the UK and award a monopoly contract, license, or exclusive right to National Savings & Investments / Atos.

R (London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association and others) v Lord Chancellor [2015] EWCA Civ 230, [2015] EWHC 295 (Admin), [2014] EWHC 4733 (Admin)-- represented the claimant / appellant solicitors» associations in their challenges to the Lord Chancellor's decisions concerning criminal legal aid tenders.

Acted for the Claimants / Appellants in their challenge to the Lord Chancellor's decision to cut by two - thirds the number of criminal legal aid contracts for duty provider work.

The Appellant initially sought to challenge both decisions by way of judicial review, the first in the Upper Tribunal and the second in the Administrative Court.

[7] In addition to the jurisdictional issue, the appellant challenged the trial judge's decision on two grounds...

Finally, to the extent that the appellants renew their challenge to the trial judge's decision based on the arguments advanced by them before the appeal judge, those arguments were fully considered by the appeal judge, and rejected, for cogent and clear reasons.

The appellant challenges the application judge's decision on custody and equalization.