Sentences with phrase «appellants at»

Chase Bank filed a foreclosure suit against defendants / appellants (a husband and wife) and filed returns of service signed by Chase's process server who certified that he served both appellants at the same time on the same date.

City of Guelph v. Super Blue Box Recycling, 2009 ONCA 481 - Acted for Appellants at the Court of Appeal in appeal of a lengthy trial on contractual issues

Both TLABC and CBA BC morphed from interveners in earlier instances to in situ appellants at the SCC, and each participated through the able advocacy of their legal champions, Darrell Roberts, QC, and Chantelle Rajotte, co-champions for TLABC, and Sharon Matthews, QC and Dr. Melina Buckley on behalf of CBA BC.

It was the above alleged conduct that necessitated the filing of criminal charges by the Independent Corrupt Practices and other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) against the Appellant at the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Abuja.

The only evidence on this issue was a GAF test score put forward by the appellant at the hearing before the Appeal Tribunal.

Notable mandates: Counsel for the successful appellant at the Supreme Court of Canada in Housen v. Nikolaisen; counsel for Potash Corp. in matters relating to the expansion of its Rocanville mine; ongoing work in the restructuring of the pork industry, including CCAA proceedings and receiverships; acted for Northland Power in the development and construction of two gas - powered generating plants; represented Great Western Diamonds in its recent acquisition of the Brazilian operations of Santa Elina Mines; appointed as counsel by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal to argue on a reference against the constitutionality of proposed legislation permitting marriage commissioners to refuse to perform same sex marriages.

Not exact matches

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

«Take notice that the appellant being dissatisfied with the decision of the governorship election tribunal for Rivers state, sitting in Abuja, contained in the judgment of the tribunal coram Hon. Justice Suleiman Ambursa (chairman), Hon. Justice Wesley Ibrahim Leha (member) and Hon. Justice Bayo Taiwo (member)(sitting in court no. 23 of the FCT high court dated the 24th of October 2015, doth hereby appeal to the court of appeal upon the grounds set out in paragraph 3 and will at the hearing seek the reliefs set out in paragraph 4,» the statement read.

However, Mr Sylvanus Tahir, Counsel to EFCC urged the court to dismiss the two appeals, adding that the appellants had opened their cases at the trial court.

The conviction was later overturned by the High Court, which found «there was no evidence to suggest that any of the followers of the appellant's «tweet» found it to be of a menacing character or, at a time when the threat of terrorism is real, even minimally alarming.»

To the contrary, Appellants concede that the only type of voter fraud that the Photo - ID Requirement prevents is in - person voter impersonation fraud at the polling place.

The judge also awarded the sum of N100, 000 in favour of each appellant in the matter, saying, «the proceedings and other decisions taken on May 21, 2016 at the National Convention are hereby set aside.»

In the light of the above, the course aims at adopting a right - based approach to improve the inclusivity and provide comprehensive access to justice for PWDs, either as direct or indirect participants and whether as victims of crime, suspects, witnesses, plaintiffs, defendants, appellants, remand prisoners and / or prison inmates.

At the hearing of the appeal, Daudu faulted the judgment of the appeal court on among other grounds that it erroneously affirmed the competence of the proceedings of the Code of Conduct Tribunal, which sat on the appellant's case with only two members as against the three provided for in the provisions of Paragraph 15 (1) of the Fifth Schedule to the 1999 Constitution.

The appellate court, in arriving at its decision, said it was necessary that it determined whether or not the appellant was denied fair hearing by the lower court.

February 2, 2017 — Teacher Plaintiffs - Appellants» Reply Brief to the U.S. Court of Appeal for the at the Ninth Circuit

At the same time, DOCR will request in writing that the recipient who denied the certification provide copies of all documentation (including hearing transcripts, interviews, applications, etc.) used in making the determination not to certify the appellant.

Appellants correctly state that, viewed «in the foreign currency in which it was transacted,» the purchase generated a 110,227 pound gain as of the date of the sale, which translates to approximately $ 200,000 at the $ 1.82 per pound exchange rate.

Appellants agree that the 453,374 pounds received for their residence should be translated into U.S. dollars at the $ 1.82 exchange rate prevailing at the date of sale.

The appellants in AA (Pakistan)[2008] UKAIT 00003 (21 December 2007) had originally applied for HSMP status in reliance on Home Office guidance which said that: (i) applications would be considered on the basis of the HSMP rules at the time they were submitted; (ii) the Home Office might make changes to the rules in the future; and (iii) that once in the programme, they would be in a category that led to settlement.

The Court stayed a robbery conviction because the police systematically beat up the appellant («good cop - bad cop» strategy, described at paras. 10, 15, 23, & 27).

An interim injunction was pronounced a few days later, and a second injunction, pronounced in May 2009, further enjoined the Appellant from attending at or near Salt Spring Island, BC.

At trial, the appellants successfully argued that their role did not involve the trafficking of cocaine.

Police officers under the control of the appellant had arrested MKK and another man at an ATM machine on Oxford Street, London.

The Court of Appeal largely accepted a revised form of order drafted by the Respondent to address these concerns, adding that a clause must be included permitting the Appellant to appear at any court in the province, in a criminal proceeding, in response to any process requiring him to appear, without having to contact the sheriff's office first.

It was in respect of her containment that the appellant brought an action against the Commissioner for damages at common law for false imprisonment and under s 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) in respect of her right to liberty as guaranteed by Art 5 of the Convention.

In this case, the appellant was arrested, handcuffed, placed in the rear of the police car and taken to a police station, a 16 minute trip and once at the station, was kept in police custody for another hour and 50 minutes.»

However in this case the judge at first instance was entitled to find that the Appellant's failure to act was a «serious derelict of his duty» because of the critical role the survey played in the Respondent's culture.

Facts: On July 12, 2015 at just after midnight on a residential street in the Lower Mainland, BC the appellant, BF, was involved in a singular motor vehicle accident and moments later BF was found unconscious by another passing driver who saw the accident occur.

Within 14 days after notice of appeal is filed, except that in bail appeals and juvenile abuse and neglect cases, appellant orders transcripts at the same time notice of appeal is filed

Justice Brown wrote, at paragraph 36, «By resorting to rule 20 to compel the self - represented appellant to deliver an expert report, without meeting their own evidentiary obligations as moving parties under the rule, the defendants used the rules in a procedurally inappropriate manner.»

In the Appellant's case threshold reliability requirements were met and the judge's decision, absent an error in principle, is entitled to deference (at para. 47).

If you are the appellee, your brief should contain the same elements as the appellant's brief but does not need a statement of the case (see V.R.A.P. 28 (b) at Lexis Nexis).

The Court reasoned that if the appellant were to maintain an ongoing ownership interest it would in effect «nullify the termination provision in the JVA, or at least make the termination meaningless.»

Although the parties came to an agreement which included the appellant remaining at the practice once a week, there was still a disagreement as to how the appellant would ultimately leave the practice, including whether the appellant would withdraw over time and the parties buy - out rights.

Lauzon, [2007] A.J. No. 768 (QB): Appeal by accused from conviction for assault — Appellant charged with assaulting complainant at remand centre — Complainant did not testify at trial — Officer's evidence only referred to complainant's last name — No evidence adduced that at time of offence, there was only one inmate with complainant's last name — Crown specified complainant's first name in charge --

In the Appellant's case there were compelling reasons underlying the need for an instruction of added scrutiny concerning the testimony of the four other witnesses implicated in the crimes (at para. 54 and 58).

Some may remember United States v. Denedo, where the appellant won at the Supreme Court, but then his appellate lawyer failed to file a petition to CAAF in time — out of court, done, no relief.

Fourthly, in rejecting the appellant's argument that upholding the trial decision could lead to indeterminate liability, the Supreme Court implicitly capped the damages that can flow from a single audit opinion at one year — given that statutory audits must occur annually.

If you are the appellant, your brief must contain a statement of the issues, a table of contents, a table of cases, a statement of the case, an argument, and a conclusion with the relief you want (see V.R.A.P. 28 (a) at Lexis Nexis).

Although the appellant continued to work at the general practice dentistry clinic during his training, it was the understanding of the parties the joint venture would terminate, without winding - up the practice.

The appellants would be effectively stripped of a remedy if the courts were to impose upon them, at this stage, the burden of showing a prima facie case.

If you look at the BBC's news website, the headline item is the Khadr interrogation video released as a result of Minister of Justice, Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Appellants v. Omar Ahmed Khadr Respondent — and — British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, Criminal Lawyers» Association (Ontario), University of Toronto, Faculty of Law — International Human Rights Clinic and Human Rights Watch Interveners, in which the court held that

It was contended on behalf of the appellant that the law relating to the offence of outraging public decency had developed in such a way that the offence was confined to those instances where the necessary lewd act had been witnessed by at least one person, and the public nature of the offence was only satisfied if, in addition, at least one other person either had or could have seen the act.

At the same hearing the HDI, Aaron Detlor, and Hazel Hill (the Appellants) applied to quash the bylaws.

BTLB reports that «the MySpace records showed that someone was logged into the Appellant - Defendant's account at the time of the crime.

In each case, a juror had been employed as a prison officer at the establishment to which the appellant had been remanded prior to trial.

At the moment (10 am ET), however, I'm watching something called Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant)(Scotland)-- UKSC 2010/0178.

One, in her statement, described how the complainant disclosed to her the physical abuse she had suffered at the hand of the appellant, but at court gave evidence of further disclosures of sexual assaults.

At trial, she was acquitted of sexual interference and sexual assault because the trial judge found that the sexual activity had been consensual, that the appellant had honestly believed the complainant was legally able to consent, and that the Crown had not proven that the appellant failed to take all reasonable steps to ascertain the complainant's age.