Moreover, as the Supreme Court explained, «a circuit court
appellate decision made according to the forms of law and the rules prescribed for rendering it, although it may be erroneous in its conclusion as to what the law is as applied to facts, is not a departure from the essential requirements of law remediable by certiorari.»
Defeated class certification of Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (FDUTPA) and implied warranty claims in federal court cases involving claims against airplane part manufacturer and dental implant manufacturer; Defense of automotive class actions has led to several
appellate decisions making certification of such claims very difficult in Florida.
Several Kentucky
appellate decisions make a distinction about comments made by a lawyer in a pending case, and statements made after the conclusion of a case.
Not exact matches
For trial court judges, the prospect of
appellate review of their
decisions partially mitigates the risk of a judge
making bad
decisions due to declining intellectual capacity.
By so doing, he is
making himself a superintendent and overseer and an
appellate court over
decisions of a court of competent jurisdiction which under a constitutional democracy like ours and under the rule of law can never be possible.»
Making reference to the Courts Act of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an
appellate court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal case, shall allow the appeal if the
appellate court considers (a) that the verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong
decision on a question of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage of justice, and in any other case shall dismiss the appeal.»
«Clearly it was very, very conservative and he had
made decision after
decision on the
appellate court, and it ended up that he didn't get confirmed and the person who got confirmed as a Supreme Court judge — I can't even remember his name.»
She pointed out that the California Teachers Association has racked up three wins since spring, with the
appellate court's unanimous ruling to overturn Vergara, the Supreme Court's
decision this week to decline to review the case and the thwarting of her own bill that would have
made changes to teacher tenure and dismissal procedures.
O. Any final and definitive
decision of an administrative law judge, or in the case such
decision is appealed, a final and definitive judgment of an
appellate court, issued in connection with any hearing held pursuant to this Chapter and the Administrative Procedure Act shall be considered a valid and final judgment that may be
made executory by the commissioner in accordance with the Code of Civil Procedure.
Following a broadly structured
decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to vacate the DOL fiduciary rule expansion, the National Association for Fixed Annuities decided its own
appellate challenge has been
made unnecessary.
But the
appellate court's
decision to keep blocking the ban pending trial or further appeal is also «a losing situation for the business travel industry,» GBTA said, because «the uncertainty it will create as we await an appeal to the Supreme Court will continue to
make its mark.
The
decision might seem harsher still, since it is an example of an
appellate judge who reviews a discretion - based
decision of the judge below, and concludes that he would not have
made the variation order himself, at first instance; but upholds the
decisions and, correctly, dismisses the appeal, because it can not be said that the district judge was wrong or that his
decision was outside the range of discretionary
decisions that was properly open to him.
Moreover, they have to explain almost every
decision they
make — many
decisions can be appealed, while some trial judges and all
appellate judges have to put in writing the reasons for their
decisions.
During the following two years, Richard worked closely with Justice Cotter in the intellectual and esoteric field of
appellate law and
decision -
making.
Although some judges come to a
decision after reviewing the brief, the oral argument provides an
appellate attorney with an opportunity to
make a final argument.
The court confirmed that an
appellate court should interfere only where a mistake is
made as to an «extricable question of law» or where overall the trial judge reached a completely irrational
decision.
In the end, there's nothing more frustrating to read than
appellate writing that doesn't know where it's going, and evidences that it doesn't care, or has no sense, of where it stands in the «pantheon» of
appellate decision -
making.
At trial, the jury was able to convict based on the information, but an
appellate court will have a hard time
making a
decision on the sufficiency of the evidence.
The
appellate court remanded the
decision to the trial court to consider these factors as a guide to
making a judgment on the children's best interests.
Trial court and
appellate judges will then issues
decisions affirming, denying, or modifying the
decisions made below.
I've been reading a lot of judges»
decisions recently, and I've noticed a type of comment that comes up frequently: comments that seem to only be provided in order to
make it more difficult for an
appellate court to overturn their
decision.
lexis is our professional content management lexis is the study of vocabulary in lexis is no more available lexis is an online service that provides a wide range of full lexis is focus lexis is available to all law students lexis is closed or phone line is bad lexis is a library with newspaper lexis is available via the web for students at www lexis is http lexis is a 5 year old tri girl lexis is a large electronic database lexis is available from the albert sloman library website at lexis is an exciting and challenging new word game that can be played by sighted lexis is arranged hierarchically into libraries and files lexis is available via the internet at http lexis is working on the displayed request lexis is my goodest friend from back in the day lexis is not such a great form of researching lexis is under new hardline lexis is a legal research database paid for by the paralegal department at the university of great falls lexis is a privately owned company and its top management consists of the owners who are also investors lexis is a strange mix of the three games lexis is available in the tax learning center lexis is launching a major transition of their billing system lexis is giving the student a biased perspective on the research lexis is offering
appellate advocacy training the week of september 16th lexis is now offering prizes for attending class lexis is an idea that crosses tetris with scrabble lexis is available on the web at http lexis is american in origin lexis is formalized below using syntactic metalanguage lexis is one of the world's leading online legal research service designed for use by lawyers and accountants lexis is «a good lexis is available to all qut staff and students for 2002 lexis is not an expert system giving you the answer to a problem lexis is feeling the sting of competition and decided it had to have a better web lexis is updated daily lexis is one of the two standard law data bases and provides full text of almost all legal
decisions in the united states and several european countries lexis is a computer lexis is a computer assisted legal research service that provides access to databases covering primary and secondary legal and lexis is a massive collection of legal databases which includes over 650 full text legal journals lexis is a massive collection of legal and news databases owned by reed elsevier lexis is a collection of full lexis is beschikbaar op de publieks lexis is available at the public pc in front of the information desk on the 1st floor lexis is
made up of a number of different databases lexis is available via the university dial lexis is te vergelijken met een zelfstandige juridische bibliotheek op het gebied van amerikaans recht lexis is a comprehensive online information service containing the full text of legislation and case lexis is the most comprehensive site for online legal research lexis is blind and will need special care lexis is not a common term but is primarily associated with the services offered by complainant lexis is a paper exchange programme that our department participates in with several english departments in ontario and quebec lexis is and particularly how it is different from «vocabulary lexis is the basis of language lexis is probably less well known lexis is now advertising lexisone on law lexis is continued until graduation lexis is determined to carry on with similar community projects for future lexis is used extensively to provide legal information lexis is closed or lexis is a french lexis is only permitted lexis is less sophisticated than westlaw lexis is concerned lexis is designed to keep out of the way of the candidate as much as possible lexis is open to all areas of literary study lexis is available from most of the other subject categories as well lexis is remarkably homogenous in nature lexis is similar to westlaw in coverage lexis is licensed by west group to use its star pagination system lexis is an exciting new twist on the «falling blocks» classic concept familiar to most gamers lexis is free and unlimited lexis is restricted to educational use only lexis is great for ferreting out story ideas and background research lexis is owned by darlene zapp & willis alford of fairbury lexis is a large collection of computerised legal information lexis is a full text database covering a wide range of legal information sources including case law lexis is a good starting point lexis is a legal information retrieval system lexis is giving away 100 lexis is introduced by a full colour illustration which means the learner will remember the word much more easily lexis is a legal information system lexis is prepared to offer the same kind of limited password as westlaw for first lexis is available to people with lexis passwords lexis is known as star pagination lexis is an amazing twist on the classic «falling blocks» game concept lexis is easier via the web than via its graphical software lexis is a literal search engine lexis is better for that lexis is a full range market research institute which operates on
In other words, from 24 Feb, there were competing legal claims as to the child's best interest, which the courts may
make a
decision about pursuant to § 31 of The Children Act, and where the hospital submitted a conventional plan for treatment (withdraw life support, limit treatment to palliative care): see the
appellate judgment para 116 ff.
l As a rule also, there is some basis to the claims they
make; what is in issue is the inappropriate and wholly excessive way in which they continue to pursue their claims after a properly constituted court (and later an
appellate tribunal) has pronounced its
decision, invariably one that has gone against them.
It's important for those in the midst of a divorce to
make sure they have adequate legal representation because it's difficult to have such
decisions reversed at the
appellate level.
In upholding the trial judge's
decision, the
appellate court found that «the appellant mischaracterizes the test for undue influence in the context of testamentary gifts,» meaning gifts
made in a will rather than during a lifetime.
A state
appellate court in Maine recently handed down a
decision that demonstrates the importance of meeting deadlines and other procedural requirements when
making a personal injury or wrongful death claim, especially when the claim is against a state or municipality.
In the first New York
appellate decision to rule on the issue, the
Appellate Division, Second Department held in its February 28, 2018 opinion in Spencer v. Spencer, that violations of matrimonial action «Automatic Orders» can be grounds for a finding of civil contempt, but an application for that relief must be
made before the entry of the judgment of divorce.
The Law flows from two places, code sections which are voted on by the Georgia legislature and from stare decisis, over 200 years of
appellate judicial
decisions that
make up the collective wisdom of the bench in interpreting the law in certain factual circumstances.
However, because it was decided by an
appellate court, it is likely to influence
decisions made under human rights legislation in all Canadian jurisdictions, particularly those involving employer drug use policies in safety sensitive workplaces.
If a Georgia
appellate court holds that a lawyer, judge or jury
made an error during the trial, or that a judge
made an error in deciding a motion for summary judgment, the
appellate court can reverse the trial court's
decision or order a new trial.
District judges have the time (because they've invested the time in pretrial hearings, trials, and sentencing hearings) to
make good sentencing
decisions, whereas
appellate judges don't have and can't have the same time invested in each case.
Hopefully such changes also would enhance the ability of
appellate courts to
make «a sensible
decision» based on all of the «important facts» for such a
decision.
[A] n
appellate court may only intervene in the
decision of a trial judge if he or she erred in law or
made a material error in the appreciation of the facts.
We represent both claimants and defendants and offer a comprehensive service, including advice in relation to structuring commercial agreements with public bodies and to
making or challenging
decisions, representation at interim and full hearings, and beyond to the
appellate courts.
The Law Society of Upper Canada's Nov. 28, 2013,
appellate decision in Law Society of Upper Canada v. Groia, at paragraph 235, held that lawyers should not mount a defence based on prosecutorial misconduct unless they are
made «in good faith and have a reasonable basis.
The difficulty of course is that case - by - case analysis raises the costs of
decisions for the litigants, increases the risk of error and manipulation by lower court judges,
makes it harder for
appellate judges to monitor lower court
decisions, and
makes life less certain for litigants and legislators.
Karakatsanis J. points to multiple features of the elaborate statutory scheme that might be said to support the alternative interpretation and explains how each of them is nonetheless consistent with the Board's interpretation (if one can call it that), much of which is supported by reference to a
decision made by another body that «formerly» had
appellate jurisdiction from the Board (at para. 44).
The Italian constitutional Court has upheld national rules which had been judged by the ECHR as contrary to the Convention, arguing that such rules nevertheless protected a different constitutional principle of the national constitution and the convention could not modify the constitution, beng it a lower rank act - so from a theoretical point of view the CJEU adopts the same approach: the ultimate
decision on whether a EU act is in compliance with EU law must be taken within EU only (to
make a parallel, think of the CJEU approach for WTO
decisions: despite an action being contrary to WTO as decided by the
appellate body, nonetheless individuals can use such illegality as a ground to void the action within the EU system)
Judges may
make better choices and there is a clearer basis for
appellate judges to monitor lower court judges for mistakes or manipulation and for the legislature to
make its wishes known about who should be
making a
decision.
In other words, if the
appellate judges believe the lower court got the law wrong, they will reverse its
decision; but they will only reverse a finding of fact if the lower court
made an especially egregious or obvious mistake.
Of course «justice» here in the Mian case is balancing on a fine line as justice must not only be seen to be done in the scope of the
appellate review but justice must also be done in the very
decision the
appellate court
makes.
Thus, the judge had a good deal of discretion in
making his
decision and would only be reversed by the
appellate court if he
made a legal error or if the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law.
Second, I consider a number of characteristics of courts as institutions, including judicial independence, judicial training, and collective
decision -
making on
appellate courts.
The whole
decision -
making process of an
appellate court is designed to balance the need for finality against the need for quality and a fair trial in the trial court.
To
make the correct evaluation first instance
decision - makers and
appellate tribunals must remember that the Directive's purpose is to simplify and strengthen the right of free movement and residence for all EU citizens.
«Putting these factors together, in future prosecutors will be more unlikely to
make these
decisions, while the
appellate courts would like them to.
An
appellate court
makes a
decision based on the facts of one case and in Wyeth, the facts before the Court were very limited.
Maybe you'll decide you need to input the leave to appeal and appeal facta, too, and somehow take into account what was in there in assessing the significance of Clements, Ediger and Benhaim to the
decision you need to
make to render your opinion bearing in mind you don't actually know what grounds of appeal the SCC thought mattered and, remarkably enough, sometimes the SCC delivers comments on issues that (arguably) weren't dreamt of by
appellate counsel;
Given that the later case is an
appellate decision seemingly doubting the correctness of a comment
made in the earlier
appellate case released just a few months before...