This blog discusses this defense and two
appellate decisions explaining this defense.
Not exact matches
Moreover, they have to
explain almost every
decision they make — many
decisions can be appealed, while some trial judges and all
appellate judges have to put in writing the reasons for their
decisions.
Moreover, as the Supreme Court
explained, «a circuit court
appellate decision made according to the forms of law and the rules prescribed for rendering it, although it may be erroneous in its conclusion as to what the law is as applied to facts, is not a departure from the essential requirements of law remediable by certiorari.»
Karakatsanis J. points to multiple features of the elaborate statutory scheme that might be said to support the alternative interpretation and
explains how each of them is nonetheless consistent with the Board's interpretation (if one can call it that), much of which is supported by reference to a
decision made by another body that «formerly» had
appellate jurisdiction from the Board (at para. 44).
Caselaw updates: Florida's
appellate courts issue opinions
explaining their
decisions on a variety of legal issues.