At the end of March, a panel of
appellate judges dismissed Silver's appeal, saying it's up to Caproni to decide if the documents are relevant to his impending sentencing and should become public.
Fortunately, progress in stem - cell research can still continue through non-federal funds, and the prevailing zeitgeist does seem to favor an eventual nullification of the decision: Yesterday, another overreaching legal case bit the dust when
an appellate judge dismissed a lawsuit that claimed CERN's Large Hadron Collider risked destroying the Earth.
Not exact matches
Here's the decision by four
appellate court
judges — two Democrats and two Republicans —
dismissing Sen. Craig Johnson's appeal of a Dec. 4 ruling of State Supreme Court Justice Ira Warshawsky that handed the 7th SD race to Republican Jack Martins.
The decision might seem harsher still, since it is an example of an
appellate judge who reviews a discretion - based decision of the
judge below, and concludes that he would not have made the variation order himself, at first instance; but upholds the decisions and, correctly,
dismisses the appeal, because it can not be said that the district
judge was wrong or that his decision was outside the range of discretionary decisions that was properly open to him.
Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial
judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction
dismissed — Although trial
judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial
judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial
judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and
appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.
It is because of the existence of these two
appellate proceedings that the Case Management
Judge dismissed the request for removal made by the opposing party, and explained that the removal from the list of cases based on the aforementioned Article 526:
She said she hadn't, and prosecutors joined with Bostic's
appellate attorney in asking a Florida
judge to
dismiss the charges and vacate the convictions relating to the 1988 rape.
Although a
judge previously
dismissed Patsy's drug injury case on the grounds that a seller can not be held liable unless there is proof of an impurity or label inadequacy, an
appellate panel revived her negligent design defect claim and brought the case to the state's high court.
In a long - standing commercial tenancy dispute producing an earlier
appellate opinion reversing a SLAPP motion, a former landlord (plaintiff and cross-defendant) finally prevailed against tenant when the trial
judge after a bench trial awarded landlord $ 85,000 in back rent plus prejudgment interest after tenant
dismissed her cross-complaint.