The North Carolina legislature sent to Governor McCrory for approval a bill that would revamp the state's elections, including eliminating public financing for
appellate judicial elections.
Not exact matches
Opponents of commission - based appointment of judges — also known as the Missouri Plan, for the state in which the
judicial selection process originated — have obtained approval from the secretary of state for two identically worded proposed constitutional amendments that would establish contested
elections for Missouri's
appellate judges.
Oklahoma's Senate Judiciary Committee has approved five measures that would replace commission - based appointment of
appellate judges with contested
elections, limit the role of the
judicial nominating commission in identifying the best qualified applicants, allow the governor to replace some lawyer members of the commission, and require
appellate judges to get 60 percent «yes» votes to be retained.
Week ahead: retention
elections for NC
appellate courts; Texas AG can get special 3 - judge courts to hear challenges to state laws; another TX interim study on
judicial selection; broadcasting TN Supreme Court hearings online; mandate veterans courts in every CA Superior Court; guns in IL courthouses but not courtrooms
Every effort West Virginia has taken in the last several years (enacting public financing of supreme court races and moving to nonpartisan
judicial elections) North Carolina has done the opposite (repealing public financing of
appellate races and efforts to move back to partisan
judicial elections).