A recent
appellate opinion discusses how one plaintiff's execution of an overly broad settlement agreement actually dismissed multiple defendants from the case, despite her lack of intention to do so.
Although automatism and involuntary intoxication are distinct defenses, they are regularly discussed
in appellate opinions together.
MDEX Online, a medical - legal consulting firm headquartered in Chicago, estimates there are more than 4,000 trial and
appellate opinions interpreting and applying Daubert and its offspring.
The inclusion of unreported cases is useful to Ohio attorneys because
appellate opinions issued after May 1, 2002 are binding.1 Unfortunately, Google does not identify the scope of coverage, but its database appears to have more unreported opinions from federal circuit courts than federal district courts.
For courses focusing on
writing appellate opinions, this is an excellent alternative to Opinion Writing and can be added to other articles and book chapters to provide materials for a more comprehensive course.
The index is organized by category and subcategory allowing for quick identification of
appellate opinions relating to a specific type of case.
Lead attorney on four important, precedent -
setting appellate opinions: Schreiber v. Estate of Kiser (a California Supreme Court case dealing with expert witness designations); Hernandez v. State of California (dealing with governmental design immunity); Martinez v. Ford Motor Company (an auto products case dealing with Forum Non Conveniens); Romine v Johnson Controls (an auto products case dealing with consumer expectation test for defect).
In January 2013, noting that none of the seven published South
Carolina appellate opinions dealing with the issue of «continued cohabitation» had found it existed and therefore terminated alimony, I blogged, «Is there ever sufficient evidence of «continued cohabitation» to terminate alimony?»
Friend and colleague Mary Jane (M.J.) Goodwin suggested I blog on the propriety of citing
unpublished appellate opinions as legal authority in other cases.
As I wrote here earlier today, beginning in January, Fastcase will collaborate with Public.Resource.Gov to launch the Report of Current Opinions, a weekly release of all federal and state
appellate opinions available for anyone to use without restriction.
Over and over,
California appellate opinions through the years reiterate that the term «best defines itself»»; that «all attempts at definition are likely to prove confusing and dangerous»; and that «every attempt to explain [the definition of reasonable doubt] renders an explanation of the explanation necessary.»
I review my picks for the year's 10 most
important appellate opinions involving the admissibility of expert opinions and the procedural formalities surround their use.
As the name suggests, it focuses on family law in Texas, tracking all Texas
civil appellate opinions relating to family law and posting information about them within within 24 to 48 hours after their release.
Until last year,
Georgia appellate opinions were conveniently offered through a single Web site — and one which was, I believe, an official court site.
This comprehensive monthly review and digest of current New York State Appellate Tort decisions also includes access to the cumulative
online appellate opinion index.
The academics and the journalists cared about the sliver that involved something else — and of that, the small portions that led to
published appellate opinions.
Yesterday brought two
appellate opinions from Boston - based courts — one federal, one state — in which lawyers participated not as advocates, but as litigants.
A recent
Florida appellate opinion discusses the applicability of a recreational use statute to a rollerblade injury case, finding that the plaintiff was prevented from bringing a lawsuit against the government entity he claimed was responsible for his injuries.
In a long - standing commercial tenancy dispute producing an
earlier appellate opinion reversing a SLAPP motion, a former landlord (plaintiff and cross-defendant) finally prevailed against tenant when the trial judge after a bench trial awarded landlord $ 85,000 in back rent plus prejudgment interest after tenant dismissed her cross-complaint.
About Blog Trial Theory Blog is a forum to discuss trial theory, creative trial preparation, life as a trial lawyer, criminal defense law and
appellate opinions specific to South Carolina, and life in general.
* opportunities for students to address alone and in teams complex, fact - intensive problems as they arise in the world (rather than digested into legal doctrines
in appellate opinions) and to generate and evaluate solutions through private ordering, regulation, litigation and other strategies;
The October 7, 2015 Supreme Court opinion in Moore v. Moore, 414 S.C. 490, 779 S.E. 2d 533 (2015), is the first published South
Carolina appellate opinion to distinguish personal goodwill from enterprise goodwill for equitable distribution purposes.
Although
Washington appellate opinions were also available through free legal research sites, the court's announcement said that the free sites «didn't have fully updated and reliably accurate versions of all opinions.»
I really don't know, but then again neither do appellate experts such as Howard Bashman, who writes, «Just when you thought that every possible type
of appellate opinion had already been created, Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski goes and invents one more.»
Posts cover cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, and blogger Lyle Denniston also writes a «constitution check» series of posts in which he investigates assertions made about the constitution in the media and
appellate opinions.
Walters estimates that there are some 10,000
appellate opinions a week, meaning RECOP will put out roughly a half - million opinions every year.
That appellate opinion says Lexi seemed particularly interested in a relationship with her younger sister who lived with the Utah family.
The book is a «how - to» guide for drafting all types of documents common to trial and appellate courts, including bench memos, orders, findings of fact and conclusions of law, jury instructions, statements of reasons for imposing sentence,
appellate opinions, correspondence, and speeches.