Sentences with phrase «appellate panel in»

«Whether a person portrayed in one of these expressive works is a world - renowned film star — «a living legend» — or a person no one knows, she or he does not own history,» wrote the appellate panel in its March decision.

The federal appellate panel in Manhattan questioned whether Silver's misdeeds qualify as public corruption since the Supreme Court unanimously held that in accepting $ 175,000 in luxury gifts, McDonnell had given little more in return than setting up a few meetings and phone calls.

Not exact matches

In Tuesday's ruling, a three - judge appellate panel rejected Pauley's narrow definition of «repeat infringer» as only covering users who upload infringing content, rather than ones who downloaded songs for personal entertainment.

UPDATE, 4:25 pm EST: A different New York judge has granted DraftKings and FanDuel an «emergency stay» of the injunction order; it means the companies can, for now, continue to operate in New York until an appellate panel reviews the injunction on January 4.

Calgary — On January 25, 2018, Calgary - based, Artisan Ales, is appearing in Montreal before an appellate panel assembled under the Agreement on Internal Trade («AIT») in its ongoing challenge to the Alberta government's discriminatory treatment of out - of - province craft beer.

An Illinois appellate court panel eventually sided with the opponents, and ruled in early May that the school had to stop construction.

His sentencing in December 2011 to an aggregate term of one and a third to four years in prison plus with $ 750,000 in restitution was also upheld by the appellate panel.

A panel of seven appellate court judges has unanimously upheld the 2011 conviction of GOP operative John Haggerty of charges related to the theft of $ 1.1 million worth of Mayor Bloomberg's money during the billionaire mayor's third (and final) re-election campaign in 2009.

An appellate panel questioned whether former Gov. Eliot Spitzer inaccurately characterized one - time American International Group chairman and CEO Maurice «Hank» Greenberg as a criminal in public statements.

A reissued decision in the Topeka, Kan., school - desegregation suit gives a more detailed picture of a federal appellate panel's deep division over the need for continued court supervision in the historic case.

A federal district judge can order increases in property taxes, but not income taxes, to fund costly school - desegregation remedies in Kansas City, Mo., an appellate panel has ruled.

A unanimous state appellate panel reversed the trial court's decsion, and a petition for review in the state supreme court is expected.

The game makers are wrong to argue that the Federal Circuit should rehear the case because the appellate court panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its brief.

While considering the possible explanations for the disproportionate representation of female lawyers in commercial and appellate cases, the panel questioned the ability of women litigators to generate business.

In the U.S. Federal appellate courts, and maybe all of the state appellate courts, they have a procedure (as I understand it) by which a judge of the appellate court who wasn't on the hearing panel can request the full court reconsider the decision.

Rather, it merely proves that the different regional federal appellate courts follow somewhat different rules governing the order in which the judges on the three - judge panel that decided the case are listed on an opinion.

Our experienced appellate attorneys have represented clients in appeals filed in the Arizona Court of Appeals, the Arizona Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (for bankruptcy appeals), various state Courts of Appeals, including Georgia, Maryland, and Illinois; the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, United States Court of Federal Claims and the U.S. Supreme Court.

In re: Carpenter, No. 09 - 2897, involved a creditor's appeal from a bankruptcy appellate panel's holding that a social security payment to debtor was exempt and should not be included in his bankruptcy estatIn re: Carpenter, No. 09 - 2897, involved a creditor's appeal from a bankruptcy appellate panel's holding that a social security payment to debtor was exempt and should not be included in his bankruptcy estatin his bankruptcy estate.

Moreover, the recent use of such a provision in Missouri's constitution (map drawn by panel of appellate judges if legislature can not come up with map) lead to proposals in that state to remove the map - by - judges provision of that state's constitution.

In addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free PresIn addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Presin a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Presin North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Press.

Please let John DeBruyn at [email protected] know if you would be available to join the panel and take an active part in the appellate process discussion that will run Wednesday through Friday.

During her clerkship, Sarah researched and analyzed novel issues in many areas of law including civil, criminal, family, unemployment, workers compensation, and juvenile to advise and recommend the resolution of appellate cases to rotating three - judge panels.

«In short, the plaintiffs have failed — both as a matter of statutory interpretation and as a matter of facts alleged — to state a claim that the [FHFA] acted outside its authority as a conservator and thereby lost the protection of section 4617 (f),» according to the appellate panel.

The format will have two lawyers presenting their cases in the form of appellate arguments to a panel of judges.

Now, instead of assuming that appellate counsel did anything like I've outlined in items 1, 2, 3 or 4, assume it was one or more of the members of an appellate panel.

On appeal, these proceedings «by indictment» are reviewed by the Court of Appeal for Ontario usually before a three member panel of appellate judges although in rare cases a five member panel will sit.

In the course of his litigation practice, Gary has represented individuals, stockholders, and private and public corporations before federal and state trial courts, appellate courts, arbitration panels, and alternative dispute forums throughout Massachusetts and New England.

In Tuesday's opinion, written by appellate Judge Janice Rogers Brown on behalf of the three - judge panel, she referred to the constant back - and - forth as «Sisyphean labor,» stating that the case must be brought to a close in «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.&raquIn Tuesday's opinion, written by appellate Judge Janice Rogers Brown on behalf of the three - judge panel, she referred to the constant back - and - forth as «Sisyphean labor,» stating that the case must be brought to a close in «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.&raquin «the interest of procedural fairness and judicial finality.»

With years of trial experience, the Firm's lawyers are able to simplify and effectively convey the nuances of complex business disputes to state and federal court judges and juries, arbitration panels, administrative hearing officers, and in various appellate forums throughout the country.

In the decision of 1201059 Ontario Inc. v. Pizza Pizza Limited, 2015 ONSC 1208, dated February 26, 2015, a three - judge panel of the Divisional Court (an appellate branch of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice that is higher than a trial level but lower than the Court of Appeal), upheld the trial judge's dismissal of the franchisee's action for damages based on an alleged failure to provide disclosure at the time of the franchise renewal.

They then write a complete appellate brief and present a second oral argument, this time in front of a panel of practicing lawyers and judges.

We recently watched an appellate argument in a child custody dispute where the panel directly questioned the father's counsel about his failure to pay support or try to see his child during the pendency of his appeal.

Nothing in the record «jumped out» at the appellate panel to lead it to disturb the exercise of discretion below, even though the 998 offer was small and made early in the litigation (before expert depositions were taken).

We acted for the Gallery in its successful defence of the arbitration, and in the subsequent arbitral appeal before a panel of distinguished retired appellate judges.

Unlike my very favorable view of certain specialist tribunals like bankruptcy appellate panels (BAPs), I am a strong believer in review of social security disability denials by federal district judges.

But Justice Richard Fybel, in an unpublished opinion for the appellate panel, noted that the waiver form contained all of the required advisements and that Brar, given his educational level, should have understood it completely.

The Court of Review is an appellate court, and like other Article III appellate courts, it has the power to bind both lower courts (in this case, the FISC) and later Court of Review panels.22 The Court of Review probably has the same discretion as federal courts of appeals to designate opinions as precedential and non-precedential; at least, no statutory provision declares otherwise.23 The two public Court of Review opinions are published in redacted form in the Federal Reporter.24 As with the published case of the FISC sitting en banc, these published Court of Review cases are certainly precedential.25 We do not know the volume, if any, of secret non-precedential Court of Review opinions, or whether there are non-public Court of Review opinions that are nonetheless treated as precedential.

Our D.C. - based Appellate, Constitutional & Administrative Law practice represents clients in appeals before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal and state appellate courts, government agencies, and national and international arbitration panels.

A three - judge panel in the 5th Circuit appellate court lifted a permanent injunction placed on the abortion regulations by a lower court, arguing in a written opinion that the state was likely to succeed in its legal arguments.

Indeed, Hutchison — one of the top appellate lawyers in the country — is one of those who routinely sharpens his arguments in front of an institute panel.

(7) Composition of Hearing Panels and appellate or review panels: State Associations have certain latitude in establishing the procedures for appointing Hearing Panels for ethics and arbitration hearings and for determining the appropriate composition of appeal panels (ethics) and procedural review panels (arbitraPanels and appellate or review panels: State Associations have certain latitude in establishing the procedures for appointing Hearing Panels for ethics and arbitration hearings and for determining the appropriate composition of appeal panels (ethics) and procedural review panels (arbitrapanels: State Associations have certain latitude in establishing the procedures for appointing Hearing Panels for ethics and arbitration hearings and for determining the appropriate composition of appeal panels (ethics) and procedural review panels (arbitraPanels for ethics and arbitration hearings and for determining the appropriate composition of appeal panels (ethics) and procedural review panels (arbitrapanels (ethics) and procedural review panels (arbitrapanels (arbitration).