Sentences with phrase «appellate practice in state»

Richard S. Rosen, the Past President of the South Carolina Bar, is active in trial and appellate practice in the state and federal courts.

Richard S. Rosen is active in trial and appellate practice in the state and federal courts.

Jansen Voss has developed a diverse defense litigation and appellate practice in both state and federal courts in Alabama and Mississippi.

Though he is admitted to the federal bar, he focuses his appellate practice in the state courts.

Not exact matches

A top ranked attorney, Mr. Lally is an experienced practioner with an extensive background in commercial and corporate transactions, federal and state litigation, administrative proceedings, and appellate practice.

Before entering the charter school world, Renita was a public defender in New York City, practicing at the trial and appellate levels in state and federal courts.

He was Chair of the firm's Supreme Court and appellate advocacy practice, and was considered one of the most skilled appellate lawyers in the Unites States.

Alan Untereiner operates a broad appellate practice, which has featured a number of appearances in the Supreme Court and wider state and federal courts.

Tulsa's James Potts & Wulfers employment lawyer professionals are part of a diversified law practice of services for sole proprietors and business entity clients seeking representation in Oklahoma's state district and appellate courts and federal district and appellate courts.

Prior to joining MG+M, Rebecca was a partner in the Miami office of another national law firm, serving on the national trial team for one of its largest clients and leading the firm's asbestos practice in state, federal and appellate courts throughout Florida.

Mr. Robbins specializes in handling complex civil and criminal litigation in state and federal courts throughout the country and has extensive experience in trial and appellate practice, alternative dispute resolution, expert witness development and litigation management.

Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in federal and state trial and appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.

Richard is licensed to practice in New Jersey and New York, in addition to various federal trial and appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States.

His impressive record in private practice is augmented by his former appointment as Solicitor General of the United States, with clients calling upon his outstanding skills in major appellate disputes and constitutional litigation.

In reality, as the majority of legal representatives know, appellate practice typically is based in federal and state courts of appeal and typically has little to do with Supreme Court practicIn reality, as the majority of legal representatives know, appellate practice typically is based in federal and state courts of appeal and typically has little to do with Supreme Court practicin federal and state courts of appeal and typically has little to do with Supreme Court practice.

Mr. Ross» extensive business litigation expertise includes matters involving unfair business practices and related business torts, real estate disputes, partnership disputes, construction litigation, common carrier disputes and commercial litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as in alternative dispute resolution tribunals.

The attorneys in our construction law practice are skilled litigators with years of experience defending first party and third party construction law claims in both the state and federal trial and appellate court systems.

2014) is a situation where a Massachusetts appellate court held that trial judges have discretion to award attorney fees for work performed by in - house counsel for claims brought under the state's unfair trade practices law.

Scarinci Hollenbeck employment litigation practice is comprised of New Jersey's top litigation attorneys with extensive state and federal trial and appellate experience in employment litigation.

In addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free PresIn addition to the holidays, I argued at the Fifth Circuit; published two articles at The Huffington Post (here and here); produced a podcast episode on appellate practice for the ABA's Sound Advice series; gave a presentation to the Dallas Bar Association (about the post-election Supreme Court and Trump's list of possible nominees); participated in a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Presin a panel discussion about e-briefs and legal writing at the annual meeting of the Council of Chief Judges of State Courts of Appeal (in North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Presin North Carolina); was cited on SCOTUSblog and the Appellate Advocacy Blog (both here and here); and was quoted by Bloomberg (here, here, here, and here), CNN, and the Winnipeg Free Press.

His practice spans a wide range of litigation in federal and state courts at the trial and appellate levels and before arbitral tribunals.

Chris provides business and corporate advice, including advice related to sales and acquisitions, commercial leasing, contracts, real estate conveyance and financing; broad commercial litigation representation including contracts and other business disputes, commercial and residential construction defect claims, religious entity law, advice regarding employment disputes and compliance, including ADA, ADEA, Title VII, Colorado Wage Act, FLSA compliance, and administrative proceedings before EEOC and DORA - Colorado Civil Rights Division; representation in administrative proceedings, C.R.C.P. 106 (a)(4) appeals and interlocutory appeals regarding governmental immunity, defense and pursuit of 42 USC § 1983 actions in federal and state court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and appellate practice before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Circuit.

John B. Manly is a member of the State Bar of Georgia and is admitted to practice before all trial and appellate courts in Georgia, as well as the United States Supreme Court, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals and the United States District Courts...

Alongside her litigation practice, Shelley handles appellate matters, and has extensive experience in appellate motion practice and briefing before both state and federal courts.

Michael S. Lieberman is a founding partner whose many years of practice include the successful litigation of numerous complex civil and criminal matters with a particular emphasis in the federal and state appellate court system.

Tom is a member of the Ohio State Bar and has been admitted to practice pro hac vice before state trial and appellate courts in California, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin and in 20 U.S. District CoState Bar and has been admitted to practice pro hac vice before state trial and appellate courts in California, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin and in 20 U.S. District Costate trial and appellate courts in California, Illinois, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin and in 20 U.S. District Courts.

Lash & Goldberg's experienced appellate practice group has guided clients through appeals before the Florida District Courts of Appeal, Florida Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Florida administrative agencies, and courts in other states around the country.

His application to practice law in the state was turned down by a California State Bar admission committee in 2009, then overturned by a State Bar court judge, then over-overturned by an internal State Bar appellate court in 2011, and soon the California Supreme Court will weigh in with the final state was turned down by a California State Bar admission committee in 2009, then overturned by a State Bar court judge, then over-overturned by an internal State Bar appellate court in 2011, and soon the California Supreme Court will weigh in with the final State Bar admission committee in 2009, then overturned by a State Bar court judge, then over-overturned by an internal State Bar appellate court in 2011, and soon the California Supreme Court will weigh in with the final State Bar court judge, then over-overturned by an internal State Bar appellate court in 2011, and soon the California Supreme Court will weigh in with the final State Bar appellate court in 2011, and soon the California Supreme Court will weigh in with the final word.

Before joining Therium, Mr. Dempsey was a litigator in the New York office of Hogan Lovells US LLP, where his practice focused largely on consumer finance, lender liability, and other complex financial services litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts.

She also has arbitration, discovery, and significant motions practice experience in both state and federal trial and appellate courts.

Mr. Lee's appellate practice includes appeals in the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Ninth, Eleventh and Federal Circuits, the Supreme Court of California, the Supreme Court of Florida, the New York Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of Virginia, California Courts of Appeal, Florida District Courts of Appeal, Indiana Court of Appeals, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, New York Supreme Court (Appellate Division), Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and Tennessee Court of Appeals.

Admitted to practice law in both California state and federal courts, he has successfully prosecuted numerous trials and arbitrations and argued before both state and federal appellate courts.

Elizabeth Carver focuses her practice on appellate litigation in federal and state courts.

In addition to his trial practice, Don has extensive experience in appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal courtIn addition to his trial practice, Don has extensive experience in appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal courtin appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal courts.

Our trial and appellate attorneys are admitted to practice in federal and state courts in Utah, federal and state courts in several other states, various United States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme states, various United States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Over her 23 years in practice, Ms. Genesen has handled trial and appellate work in both state and federal courts, including an array of complex multi-district federal court litigation, and has appeared throughout the country before state and federal regulatory bodies on behalf of clients in the airline, energy, software, healthcare and alcoholic beverage industries.

In doing so, I offer a comprehensive defense practice that encompasses both state and federal courts from the municipal level to the appellate level.

Haverstick's litigation practice focuses primarily on representing government officials and entities in the Supreme and Commonwealth Courts of Pennsylvania, as well as other state and federal appellate courts, in matters ranging from public corruption investigations to the Right - to - Know Law to the constitutionality of state laws.

Mr. Hubley has extensive experience in appellate practice and has argued appeals involving seminal issues of state - wide importance concerning secured transactions and foreclosure.

In the course of his litigation practice, Gary has represented individuals, stockholders, and private and public corporations before federal and state trial courts, appellate courts, arbitration panels, and alternative dispute forums throughout Massachusetts and New England.

For forty years, our firm has maintained an extraordinary reputation in civil litigation and appellate practice, enjoying significant courtroom success in state and federal courts.

So far, only three published studies have analyzed the association between brief readability and case outcome, 50 and no studies have analyzed that association in the trial courts, where most lawyers practice.51 Long and Christensen sampled 882 appellate briefs from the Supreme Court, federal appellate courts, and state supreme courts.52 Their dependent variable was the outcome of the appeal (affirmed or reversed), while their independent variable was readability measured by the Flesch Reading Ease score as calculated by Microsoft Word.53 For federal appellate and state supreme court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for federal or state court, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their study.56

The Lash & Goldberg LLP consumer litigation defense practice group closely monitors trends and developments in the consumer litigation defense area including state and federal trial and appellate court decisions, as well as pronouncements by the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Commission.

For example, Kenneth Chestek found that judges, law clerks, and practicing lawyers rated sample briefs with strong narrative components as more persuasive than sample briefs without strong narrative components.13 Sean Flammer found that judges rated sample briefs as more persuasive when they were written in plain language rather than in legalese.14 Similarly, Robert Benson and Joan Kessler found that appellate judges and their law clerks preferred briefs written in plain language rather than in legalese.15 Finally, Joseph Kimble and Steve Harrington found that judges and attorneys preferred plain language over legalese.16 These studies, however, measure only the judges» and lawyers» stated preferences for particular styles of writing.

He's also the author of a chapter on technology for appellate lawyers, published in the Law Journal Press Appellate Practice in Federal & State Courts guide.

The appellate court was concerned about what may have been noted to be «routine practices» in some of the state's counties.

In truth, as many legal representatives understand, appellate practice generally is based in federal and state courts of appeal and frequently has little to do with Supreme Court practicIn truth, as many legal representatives understand, appellate practice generally is based in federal and state courts of appeal and frequently has little to do with Supreme Court practicin federal and state courts of appeal and frequently has little to do with Supreme Court practice.

Before her appointment to that position, she spent 10 years as a deputy public defender in trial offices throughout the state, and six years practicing in the Public Defender's appellate division.

The appellate practice group is responsible for dozens of significant published decisions in state and federal courts throughout the country.

John B. Kopf, III, a member of the Business Litigation practice group in Columbus, represents clients in civil and construction matters in state and federal trial courts, state and federal appellate courts, bankruptcy courts, mediations and arbitrations.