Sentences with phrase «apples and oranges comparison»

There is a bit of an apples and oranges comparison issue here, relative to the period for which there has been or is projected to have a 0.2 C per decade increase.

Such a comparison would be an apples and oranges comparison, due to the mixture of bond durations and other factors.

Due to the mixture of bond durations and other factors, this would be an apples and oranges comparison.

IMHO, this is an apples and oranges comparison.

I have to disagree with you that this is an apples and oranges comparison.

Sorry but this is really an Apples and Oranges comparison.

I've been playing the game mostly in handheld mode, becoming an apples and oranges comparison.

These are apples and oranges comparisons for obvious reasons: New York has more Democratic voters than Republican ones for starters, while turnout in primaries is a notoriously difficult to gage and draw deeper conclusion from for a general election.

Now, my issue with the above is that it is going beyond the apple and oranges comparison.

Not exact matches

The fact of the matter is that salary comparisons will always be apples - to - oranges due to the many variables at play — so we as business leaders must define roles, devise compensation ranges for those roles, and then decide where the company will position itself within those ranges based on the variables.

Odds are you weren't motivated by any of it, even comparing to Tesla and Amazon (because you know it's likely an apples to oranges comparison given the nature of some of those jobs).

This comparison is an apples and oranges type of comparison, and it is hard to understand the point being made.

Some may argue this comparison is too simplistic and «apples to oranges» but the annual terawatt hour consumption figures persist none the less, and Bitcoin costs roughly 10x more energy than CERN Meanwhile, most, if not all of us will probably find it very difficult to demonstrate a cost / utility argument in support of Bitcoin having 10x more benefit than CERN.

While your main points will likely be similar, I agree with Clark that the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index versus long Treasuries is something of an apple to oranges comparison, since the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index not only includes includes Treasuries, but also government - related and corporate securities, MBS (agency fixed - rate and hybrid ARM pass - throughs), ABS and CMBS (agency and non-agency).

The sly implication that this was the case has the same intellectual worth as a comparison of apples and oranges.

since when is the comparison of apples and oranges taught at Yale?

Experience some ups and downs, or in Tennessee's case, play at a level that has you ranked as low as 102nd in Pomeroy's rankings as late as mid-February, and you're going to put your fate into the hands of a committee that is weighing quite a few different factors and making a lot of apples - to - oranges (Tennessee vs La Salle, for instance) comparisons.

- de Blasio dismisses a question as «apples and oranges»; drink twice if the question is actually a perfectly valid apples to apples comparison

For Fulop, any comparison between McGreevey and Spitzer or Weiner would be «apples and oranges,» he said.

It's apples and oranges, but to the extent that a comparison can be made, the influence of journal impact factor seems stronger than that of either the number of citations your most cited article has received or of h - index, which is meant to measure a scientist's productivity and impact.

It wasn't an apples - and - oranges comparison, he said, but one between «McIntosh and Golden Delicious.»

«So it was almost like apples and oranges in trying to do a comparison.»

True, the many benefits inherent to private education - selective enrollment, smaller classes, greater resources, greater autonomy - may make it seem as though considering independent schools» opportunities for transformation alongside those of their public counterparts is the proverbial comparison of apples and oranges.

This is a lot like saying you can draw a valid comparison between apples and oranges by comparing apple seeds and orange seeds.

So it's an apples - and - oranges comparison.

Dana, you stated that the comparison of Insights and Jettas was like comparing apples to oranges.

The PaperWhite also has a very good showing and, to my eyes, comes in second after the iPad, but it's an apples to oranges comparison.

Anonymous, you're making an apples - and - oranges comparison.

It's an understatement to call these «apples and oranges» comparisons.

While not an apples to apples (or oranges to oranges) comparison, the slow and steady DIY investor crowd tends to ask about the value of going with one or the other of these low - cost providers.

-- Choosing the best hotel card is a matter of weighing each card's perks against your travel needs, as evaluating the pros and cons of each is an apples - to - oranges comparison... (See Hotel cards)

The purpose was to blunt the usual tendency in which folks see these purported loyalty points currency valuations and they automatically begin comparing them mindlessly across loyalty programs, not realizing that without an appropriate points currency conversion such comparisons are as meaningful as comparing apples and oranges...

I always tell people who make that comparison that they're wrong it's like comparing apples and oranges.

This will be a «falloff» in accumulation that is not real because the comparison of a non-EN year with a EN year is apples and oranges.

As a result, directly comparing the Sea Surface Temperature data from the early 20th century to the current Sea Surface Temperature data is like «comparing apples and oranges» — there have been too many changes in the data sources for such comparisons to have much meaning.

That's an apples - and - oranges comparison.

There are too many potential sources of bias which are not accounted for, too many apples - to - oranges comparisons, and they can not draw any conclusions about urban heat influences until their data are homogenized and other non-climate influences are removed.

Anyway, I've been thinking about your Apples to Oranges comparison,, And I think I have a better one.

So starting off your entire column and debate with an apples to oranges comparison leaves me wondering why I should continue to believe what I'm reading here.

Contrarians use an apples - and - oranges comparison of the two graphs, which correspond to entirely different geographical regions, in a fraudulent argument that the current global warming over the last 30 years is not caused by humans..

Otherwise it's an apples - and - oranges comparison of data.

And I do nt see almost any other of those «hockey stick» «s (like Moberg) to show «unprecedented» temperatures unless an apples to oranges - comparison with thermometers is being used.

The notorious apples - and - oranges comparison in the misleading contrarian picture above with two graphs provides an instructive example of fallacious contrarian argumentation.

In many respects I believe that comparing ebooks and print remains an apple and orange type comparison, they are different experiences each with their own merit and demerits, similarly I don't think print is going to disappear quite yet.

Just be sure to do apples to apples and oranges to oranges comparisons when reviewing different types of policies.

Rechler declined to confirm the costs, but said a comparison is «apples to oranges» because the new lease is at a much higher rent and runs for 15 years, much longer than the five - year extension it replaces.

Lynn Pineda: Getting back to the importance of comparison is right on Ryan, with comparing «apples to apples» and not apples to oranges.