The Baker & McKenzie application process was rigorous and involved many hurdles, but that's important because
applicants know the standard is very high.
Not exact matches
KLM answered «
No» to a survey question on its policy renewal asking whether KLM had any contracts with shippers that stipulated limits of liability that were higher than on the
applicant's
standard Bill of Lading (the «Question»).
According to some experts, «few
applicants would move into or out of
standard risk pools because genomic information about currently
known common variants seldom substantially affects mortality risk estimation already based on phenotype and family history,» and «there is at present insufficient benefit to warrant the addition of predictive genomic data to actuarial risk stratification models.»
In terms of cover letters, it also means «We'll trash any application which doesn't address ethical
standards and prove to us the
applicant knows what we're talking about.»
Interview Your Vendor So if there isn't a
standard background check, how do you
know that your background screening vendor is looking for what you need to
know about your
applicant?