No one will argue with the idea that traditional lenders are not as willing to lend to
applicants with poor credit histories than to those with excellent...
Loans are not supposed to be available to
applicants with poor credit histories.
The first one that was talked about quite a bit today, this morning, is that they think that employees or
applicants with poor credit history are more likely to steal.
Not exact matches
Applicants with low
credit scores combined
with low debt to income ratios often have a
poor payment
history.
To understand how a
poor credit applicant would be more attractive to a lender than a person
with no
history, you have to look at the situation through a lender's eyes.
It might seem strange that a lender would trust such a large debt to someone
with a
poor credit history, but the economic reality dictates that lenders have a more open view when considering bad
credit applicants.
It stands to reason that lenders are more likely to grant loan approval
with poor credit histories to
applicants who are recovering their
credit reputation, and strengthening their position than to those who are going in the other direction.
Although some
credit card
applicants may be required to use a cosigner if their
credit history is particularly
poor or very limited, the most common situation in which cardholders need a cosigner is for compliance
with the CARD Act of 2009.