ACCC v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 ACCC's
application for judicial review regarding process for determining merger authorisation
ACCC v Australian Competition Tribunal [2017] FCAFC 150 (22 Sept 2017) ACCC's
application for judicial review regarding process for determining merger authorisation
Not exact matches
TOMEE SOJOURNER v. CONSEIL DE LA JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE et al
Judicial Bias based on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Nature: Hearing on a Rental Board Judge's application to quash a Superior Court decision rendered in favor of an English - speaking Black lesbian, who had applied for judicial review of an earlier Administrative Judicial Council decision regarding her complaint against th
Judicial Bias based on Race, Gender, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Nature: Hearing on a Rental Board Judge's
application to quash a Superior Court decision rendered in favor of an English - speaking Black lesbian, who had applied
for judicial review of an earlier Administrative Judicial Council decision regarding her complaint against th
judicial review of an earlier Administrative
Judicial Council decision regarding her complaint against th
Judicial Council decision
regarding her complaint against the Judge.
This
application for judicial review was dismissed by the Superior Court of Ontario, but in Campbell J.'s reasons
for judgment he made extensive statements
regarding Mr. Groia's conduct during the trial (para. 12).
Each level of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform
for the
judicial review of arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and data analysis of cases
regarding applications to confirm the validity of an arbitation agreement, cases
regarding applications to cancel or enforce arbitration awards of our domestic arbitration institutions,
applications to recognize and enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region arbitration awards, cases
regarding applications to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards, and cases relating to the
judicial review of arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and others relating to the confirmation of the validity of an arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee of the correct
application of law and of a unified yardstick
for judicial decision - making.