The questions asked in these online insurance quote requests may vary from the questions asked on
an application in a particular state.
The questions asked in these online insurance quote requests may vary from the questions asked on
an application in a particular state.
Not exact matches
In addition, it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant in light of a U.S. Holder's particular circumstances, including non-U.S. tax consequences, state and local tax consequences, estate tax consequences, alternative minimum tax consequences, the potential application of the Medicare contribution tax, and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such a
In addition, it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be relevant
in light of a U.S. Holder's particular circumstances, including non-U.S. tax consequences, state and local tax consequences, estate tax consequences, alternative minimum tax consequences, the potential application of the Medicare contribution tax, and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such a
in light of a U.S. Holder's
particular circumstances, including non-U.S. tax consequences,
state and local tax consequences, estate tax consequences, alternative minimum tax consequences, the potential
application of the Medicare contribution tax, and tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders subject to special rules, such as:
I / we agree that if any material change (s) occur (s)
in my / our financial condition that I / we will immediately notify BSHFC of said change (s) and unless Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation is so notified it may continue to rely upon the
application and financial statement and the representations made herein as a true and accurate statement of my / our financial condition.nI / we authorize Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation to make whatever credit inquiries / background checks it deems necessary
in connection with this
application and financial statement.nI / we authorize and instruct any person or consumer reporting agency to furnish to BSHFC any information that it may have to obtain
in response to such credit inquiries.nIn consideration of the ongoing association between Baby Safe Homes and the undersigned applicant (hereinafter u201cApplicantu201d), the parties hereto have entered into this Non-Disclosure and Non-Competition Agreement.nWHEREAS,
in the course of its business operations, Baby Safe Homes provides its customers products and services which, by nature of the business, include trade secrets, confidential and proprietary information, and other matters deemed material or important enough to warrant protection; and WHEREAS, Applicant, by reason of his / her interest
in Baby Safe Homes and
in the course of his / her duties, has access to said secrets and confidential information; and WHEREAS, Baby Safe Homes has trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary information, including procedures, customer lists, and
particular desires or needs of such customers to which Applicant has access
in the course of his / her duties as an Applicant.nNow, therefore,
in consideration of the premises contained herein, the parties agree as follows Applicant shall not, either during the time of his / her franchise evaluation with Baby Safe Homes or at any time thereafter either directly or indirectly, communicate, disclose, reveal, or otherwise use for his / her own benefit or the benefit of any other person or entity, any trade secrets or other confidential or proprietary information obtained by Employee by virtue of his / her employment with Baby Safe Homes,
in any manner whatsoever, any such information of any kind, nature, or description concerning any matters affecting or relating to the Baby Safe Homes business, or
in the business of any of its customers or prospective customers, except as required
in the course of his / her employment by Baby Safe Homes or except as expressly authorized Baby Safe Homes Franchise Corporation,
in writing.nDuring any period of evaluation with Baby Safe Homes, and for two (2) years thereafter, Applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, induce or influence, divert or take away, or attempt to divert or take away and, during the
stated period following termination of employment, call upon or solicit, or attempt to call upon or solicit, any of the customers or patrons Baby Safe Homes including, but not limited to, those upon whom he / she was directly involved, or called upon, or catered to, or with whom became acquainted while engaged
in the franchise evaluation process of a Baby Safe Homes franchise business.
This contribution analyses the possible legal obligations of
States in relation to the right to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress and its
applications,
in particular as regards health.
«
In addition to identifying the impacts of the emissions from this
particular coal - fired power plant on fetal health, the usefulness of this study's identification strategy is its potential
application to other studies examining the impact of upwind
states» power plant emissions, which have been the target of a series of environmental regulations, such as the EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule,» adds Yang.
Restore The Music UK welcomes
applications at any time from any
state primary and secondary schools across the 33 London boroughs but,
in particular, from those who would otherwise be unable to provide this level of music facility for their students.
The aim of the project is to use the expertise of Harrow teachers and the resources at Harrow's disposal to help make
applications to Oxford and Cambridge Universities more accessible to
state - school applicants and,
in particular, to demystify these universities and the
application process surrounding them.
In short, the law does not require the
State Board of Education to deny a charter renewal
application for any
particular reason, although it may do so.
In NJ, one and only one person, the
state Education Commissioner, is exclusively tasked with deciding whether a charter
application should be granted — there is zero local control over whether a charter is granted for a
particular community.
(e) The board shall establish the information needed
in an
application for the approval of a charter school; provided that the
application shall include, but not be limited to, a description of: (i) the mission, purpose, innovation and specialized focus of the proposed charter school; (ii) the innovative methods to be used
in the charter school and how they differ from the district or districts from which the charter school is expected to enroll students; (iii) the organization of the school by ages of students or grades to be taught, an estimate of the total enrollment of the school and the district or districts from which the school will enroll students; (iv) the method for admission to the charter school; (v) the educational program, instructional methodology and services to be offered to students, including research on how the proposed program may improve the academic performance of the subgroups listed
in the recruitment and retention plan; (vi) the school's capacity to address the
particular needs of limited English - proficient students, if applicable, to learn English and learn content matter, including the employment of staff that meets the criteria established by the department; (vii) how the school shall involve parents as partners
in the education of their children; (viii) the school governance and bylaws; (ix) a proposed arrangement or contract with an organization that shall manage or operate the school, including any proposed or agreed upon payments to such organization; (x) the financial plan for the operation of the school; (xi) the provision of school facilities and pupil transportation; (xii) the number and qualifications of teachers and administrators to be employed; (xiii) procedures for evaluation and professional development for teachers and administrators; (xiv) a statement of equal educational opportunity which shall
state that charter schools shall be open to all students, on a space available basis, and shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, gender identity, ethnicity, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, age, ancestry, athletic performance, special need, proficiency
in the English language or academic achievement; (xv) a student recruitment and retention plan, including deliberate, specific strategies the school will use to ensure the provision of equal educational opportunity as
stated in clause (xiv) and to attract, enroll and retain a student population that, when compared to students
in similar grades
in schools from which the charter school is expected to enroll students, contains a comparable academic and demographic profile; and (xvi) plans for disseminating successes and innovations of the charter school to other non-charter public schools.
In particular, the $ 4.35 billion for the Race to the Top grant
application required
states to detail their education strategies.
Today's «Unlocking Talent, Fulfilling Potential» paper
states that the government will «invite a new wave of mainstream free school
applications in early 2018, with a
particular focus on enabling more challenging areas to feel the full benefit of the programme».
Shareholders should consult their tax advisers about the
application of federal,
state and local and foreign tax law
in light of their
particular situation.
Without entering into the details for the calculation of the energy requirements for each
particular condition, it is enough to say that the quantitative evaluation of the metabolizable energy requirements
in particular conditions of breed, physiological
state and environmental climate is based on the
application of well - defined correction factors to the above general formula for ME.
A fortiori, a prohibition on giving to the concept of «enquiry» [enquête] a meaning which takes account of the specific features of the Union, and
in particular the task incumbent on the Commission to investigate [enquêter] any failures of Member
States to fulfil their obligations which might adversely affect the correct
application of the Treaties and the EU rules adopted pursuant to the Treaties, can not be inferred from those provisions.
The CJEU came down firmly on the side of extraterritorial
application,
stating unambiguously that Regulation 1/2005 «does not subject the transport of animals with a point of departure within the territory of the European Union and a destination
in a third country to any
particular approval scheme, different from that applicable to transport taking place within the European Union» (para. 47).
In particular, a
State may exclude compulsory jurisdiction with respect to «disputes concerning the interpretation or
application of articles 15, 74 and 83 relating to sea boundary delimitations, or those involving historic bays or titles».
Unique strengths of our practice involve
particular expertise
in the
application of the Code of Canon Law as well as the representation of the Roman Catholic Church throughout the United
States.
upon
application from a court of another Member
State with which the child has a
particular connection,
in accordance with paragraph 3.
(3) Any Contracting
State may declare
in accordance with Article 63 that it will extend the
application of the whole or any part of the Convention to any maintenance obligation arising from a family relationship, parentage, marriage or affinity, including
in particular obligations
in respect of vulnerable persons.
78
In particular, in a case such as that before the referring court, it is important that the competent authorities of the host Member State are able, when examining the application of a Union citizen who is not economically active and is in Mr Brey's position, to take into account, inter alia, the following: the amount and the regularity of the income which he receives; the fact that those factors have led those authorities to issue him with a certificate of residence; and the period during which the benefit applied for is likely to be granted to hi
In particular,
in a case such as that before the referring court, it is important that the competent authorities of the host Member State are able, when examining the application of a Union citizen who is not economically active and is in Mr Brey's position, to take into account, inter alia, the following: the amount and the regularity of the income which he receives; the fact that those factors have led those authorities to issue him with a certificate of residence; and the period during which the benefit applied for is likely to be granted to hi
in a case such as that before the referring court, it is important that the competent authorities of the host Member
State are able, when examining the
application of a Union citizen who is not economically active and is
in Mr Brey's position, to take into account, inter alia, the following: the amount and the regularity of the income which he receives; the fact that those factors have led those authorities to issue him with a certificate of residence; and the period during which the benefit applied for is likely to be granted to hi
in Mr Brey's position, to take into account, inter alia, the following: the amount and the regularity of the income which he receives; the fact that those factors have led those authorities to issue him with a certificate of residence; and the period during which the benefit applied for is likely to be granted to him.
80 However,
in the course of such an examination and when determining
in particular whether the conditions laid down
in Article 7 (1) of Directive 2003/86 are satisfied, the provisions of that directive must be interpreted and applied
in the light of Articles 7 and 24 (2) and (3) of the Charter, as is moreover apparent from recital 2
in the preamble to and Article 5 (5) of that directive, which require the Member
States to examine the
applications for reunification
in question
in the interests of the children concerned and with a view to promoting family life.
If an
application overcomes the hurdles
in CA 2006, s 263 (2) the court will then take into account the discretionary factors set out in s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in CA 2006, s 263 (2) the court will then take into account the discretionary factors set out
in s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in s 263 (3) which
states: «(3)
In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account,
in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in particular --(a) whether the member is acting
in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in good faith
in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting
in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and
in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and
in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission
in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue
in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.&raqu
in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.»
The
application was filed with the United
States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on May 9 and has yet to be granted, though the lack of similar trademarks
in the field of consumer electronics indicates that the Mountain View - based tech giant will have no issues with acquiring this
particular trademark.
Given a
particular state's
application of the rules of evidence, the expert you want to hire is prepared to support his or her testimony
in terms of the rules.
State legislatures are not alone
in recognizing the unique nature of the real estate industry and the corresponding need to carve out real estate professionals from general
application of
particular statutes.