As further explained in my Citi credit card
application rules article, this means that you can't have opened or closed another Citi ThankYou earning card within the past 24 months or you will not receive the sign - up bonus.
There are some exceptions to this and you can read more about them in the American Express
application rules article.
Not exact matches
The 4 - 1 majority
ruling in favour of an
application brought before the Supreme Court by lawyers for Dr. Zanetor Agyeman — Rawlings was given on Thursday May 19 2016 in which the panel led by Justice William Atuguba stayed proceedings in the high court case against the candidature of Dr. Zanetor Agyeman - Rawlings pending the interpretation of
article 94 (1)(a) of the 1992 constitution on June 2 2016.
Just make sure that you've read all of the Chase
application rules that are linked near the top of this
article.
In a significant win for access to justice in environmental matters, the Court's Grand Chamber found that
Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the right to an effective remedy), read together with the Aarhus Convention, precluded the
application of national procedural
rules allowing for swift decision - making at the expense of rights granted to environmental NGOs.
As a
rule of international law applicable in the relations between the parties, the Court
ruled that the principle of self - determination had to be taken into account when interpreting the territorial scope of the AA in accordance with the
rule codified in
Article 31 (3)(c) VCLT, and that the
application to Western Sahara was thus excluded (Front Polisario paras 88 - 92).
Before the Court could find that the German
rules in question were contrary to
article 18 TFEU (which would be easy), it had to deal with the objection put forward by the German and French governments that the
application of
article 18 TFEU would deprive
article 58 (1) of its useful effect.
[the EICC concerned (La Poste)-RSB- was not subject to the ordinary law
rules governing the administration and winding - up of firms in difficulty and that, according to point 1.2, second paragraph, fourth indent of the 2008 Notice [on the
application of
Articles 87 [EC] and 88 [EC] to State aid in the form of guarantees (OJ 2008 C 155, p. 10)-RSB-, there is aid in the form of a guarantee where more favourable credit terms are obtained by undertakings whose legal status
rules out bankruptcy or other insolvency procedures (T - 154 / 10, at para. 23, emphasis added).
The ICS will include an appeal mechanism, giving the tribunal appellate jurisdiction over (a) errors in the
application or interpretation of applicable law; (b) manifest errors in the appreciation of the facts, including the appreciation of relevant domestic law; and (c) the grounds set out in
Article 52 (1) of the ICSID Convention, such as the presence of corruption or a serious departure from the fundamental
rules of procedure.
As detailed in this local
article, headlined «Tennessee moves closer to executing first woman: Sixth Circuit denies appeal to woman convicted in murder for hire of husband,» a new federal habeas
ruling in a state capital case provides an effective opportunity to reflect on gender bias in the
application of the death penalty.
CONSIDERING that, as any national court, the Unified Patent Court must respect and apply Union law and, in collaboration with the Court of Justice of the European Union as guardian of Union law, ensure its correct
application and uniform interpretation; the Unified Patent Court must in particular cooperate with the Court of Justice of the European Union in properly interpreting Union law by relying on the latter's case law and by requesting preliminary
rulings in accordance with
Article 267 TFEU;»
Due to ambiguity as to its meaning, the UK Court of Appeal submitted a preliminary reference question on
Article 6 of the Regulation, the
rule applicable to determining the Member State which must examine the asylum
application lodged by a child.
73 Although the SBC, which is the basic legislation in the matter, states in
Article 12 (4) thereof, that the aim of such surveillance is to apprehend individuals crossing the border illegally, it does not contain any
rules concerning the measures which border guards are authorised to apply against persons or ships when they are apprehended and subsequently — such as the
application of enforcement measures, the use of force or conducting the persons apprehended to a specific location — or even measures against persons implicated in human trafficking.
If Member States are enforcing substantive EU norms through administrative and criminal penalties, the CJEU clearly should be able to oversee uniform
application of EU law, especially considering the fact that
article 2 TEU states that the «Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the
rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities».
Given that the European Union's own resources include, as provided in
Article 2 (1) of Council Decision 2007 / 436 / EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities» own resources (OJ 2007 L 163, p. 17), revenue from
application of a uniform rate to the harmonised VAT assessment bases determined according to European Union
rules, there is thus a direct link between the collection of VAT revenue in compliance with the European Union law applicable and the availability to the European Union budget of the corresponding VAT resources, since any lacuna in the collection of the first potentially causes a reduction in the second» (para. 26).
The tribunal
ruled in favour of Peter Mokua Gichuru's claim that he was discriminated against as a result of a question in the law society's
articling application that asked: «Have you ever been treated for schizophrenia, paranoia, or a mood disorder described as a major affective illness, bipolar mood disorder, or manic depressive illness?»
However, in view of the objective of foreseeability, which the
rules on jurisdiction must pursue, the place of establishment of that server can not, by reason of its uncertain location, be considered to be the place where the event giving rise to the damage occurred for the purpose of the
application of
Article 5 (3) of Regulation No 44/2001.
[3] The STL system is in fact composed of 5 different measures, namely (1) the accelerated depreciation
rule (
Article 115 (6) of the Spanish Tax Law on Corporate Tax (TRLIS)-RRB-; (2) the discretionary
application of early depreciation (
Article 115 (11) TRLIS and
Articles 48 (4) and 49 of the Spanish Regulation on Corporate Tax (RIS); the tax status of EIGs (
Article 48 and 49 TRLIS); (4) the Tonnage Tax system (
Articles 124 to 128 TRLIS); and (5) a
rule according to which certain sea - going vessels that would normally be regarded as used or second hand upon their transfer into the Tonnage Tax system are deemed to be new (
Article 50 (3) RIS).
He has extensive experience in all types of immigration matters including preparing asylum and immigration appeals, entry clearance
applications,
Article 8
applications, family reunion, EEA
applications and complex
applications outside the immigration
rules.
Business litigation lawyer Amanda E. Gordon wrote the
article entitled «The E-Usual Course of Business: ESI
Application to
Rule 34 Requirements,» which was featured in the Spring 2016 issue of the American Bar Association's Business Torts & Unfair Competition journal.
FPR 2010, 2.3 (1)(on the interpretation of the FPR 2010) will be amended to insert: ««the 2007 Hague Convention» means the Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and other forms of Family Maintenance done at The Hague on 23 November 2007» and after the definition of «
application notice»: ««
Article 11 form» means a form published by the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference under
Article 11 (4) of the 2007 Hague Convention for use in relation to an
application under
Article 10 of that Convention, and includes a Financial Circumstances Form as defined in
rule 9.3 (1) which accompanies such an
application.»
The wording of
article 37 (1) of the 2012 ICC
Rules paves the way to an
application, as indeed does (expressly) the ICC Commission Report of 2015 (para. 87).
In the present case, it is common ground, that the amount of the public contract at issue in the main proceedings amounts to EUR 85,000, which is considerably below the thresholds for
application laid down in
Article 4 of Directive 2014/24... On the other hand, in its reference for a preliminary
ruling, the referring court has not provided any information enabling the Court to... demonstrate the existence of a certain cross-border interest... In those circumstances, the Court finds itself unable to provide a useful answer to the question raised... (C - 486 / 17, paras 17 - 22, references omitted, own translation from French and emphasis added).
(correct test for Barrister appeals; whether outside the ex improviso
rule, prosecutor may call evidence after prosecution and defence case closed; use of debarring orders against prosecutor; whether tribunal may «enter the arena» and strongly request the attendance of a prosecution witness; whether BSB has power to summons witnesses; whether prosecutor may communicate with disciplinary judge behind the back of the defence; whether such communication redolent of actual bias of judge where judge wishes prosecutor good luck on appeal; whether apparent bias doctrine can be engaged by post-trial conduct of judge; legal effect of serving BSB prosecutions department officer being 1 of 4 appointing members of the COIC «Tribunals Appointments Body» (TAB); whether TAB ultra vires the Bar's Constitutions; whether open - ended power of removal of member of COIC pool without cause, unlawful given position of BSB Chair and senior staff on COIC; whether ECHR
Article 6 guarantees against pressure on disciplinary judges to conform with a prosecutorial mentality; whether disciplinary judges Art. 6 «independent» within Findlay v United Kingdom given key role of BSB prosecutions department in appointing disciplinary judges; serious non-disclosure by BSB of notes of secret meeting between BSB and disciplinary judge until day before appeal and despite requests and
application for disclosure by defence)
Article 27 (1) Where the immediate appeal referred to in paragraph (4) of
Article 35 (Inspection, etc. of the Portion related to the Examination of the Facts) of the Act is filed, if the court of prior instance finds no need to forward the record of the case pertaining to personal status litigation, it is sufficient for a court clerk of the court of prior instance to forward only the record of the appeal case to a court clerk of the court in charge of the appeal, notwithstanding the provisions of
Article 174 (Forwarding of Record due to Filing of Appeal to Second Instance) of the
Rules of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to
Article 205 (
Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance or Final Appeal) of said
Rules.
By way of derogation from the
rules laid down in paragraph 3, the same procedures shall apply for a decision to suspend the
application of an agreement, and for the purpose of establishing the positions to be adopted on behalf of the Community in a body set up by an agreement based on
Article 310, when that body is called upon to adopt decisions having legal effects, with the exception of decisions supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement.
For the
application of this
Article, the Governing Council shall establish the necessary
rules for standardising the accounting and reporting of operations undertaken by the national central banks.
15 By a separate document lodged at the same time as the
application, the applicant requested that the case be dealt with under the expedited procedure pursuant to
Article 152 of the
Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
In fact the CCC implies that the content of those provisions is to be determined autonomously from EU law — so that they can e.g. be «amended» by a
ruling of a national constitutional court, such as the decisions of the CCC ordering the payment of a special increment to Czech citizens negatively affected by the
application of
Article 20 of the C - S agreement.
But what it means in practice is that the only reason today that
Article III judges must defer to the D.C. Court of Appeals on questions of D.C. law is because the D.C. Circuit itself has said so — and so stare decisis, and not the
Rules of Decision Act or principles of federalism — carries all the weight (and would not bind federal courts outside of the D.C. Circuit in diversity cases in which choice - of - law rules compel application of D.C. substantive
Rules of Decision Act or principles of federalism — carries all the weight (and would not bind federal courts outside of the D.C. Circuit in diversity cases in which choice - of - law
rules compel application of D.C. substantive
rules compel
application of D.C. substantive law).
Next, the referring court enquired about the
application of
Article 5 (3)'s special jurisdictional
rule in the event of infringement of competition law, where that infringement concerns a complex horizontal agreement, spread over a long period of time, and with varying impact in various markets.
[3] On the basis of the applicant's cassation appeal with the Supreme Administrative Court by order dated 9.5.2012, No. 6 Ads 18/2012 -82, reversed in accordance with
Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the interpretation of European Union law on the Court and presented him the following questions: 6 Ads 18/2012 First Excludes Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 on the
application of social security schemes nazaměstna not persons and their families moving within the Community (Regulation of the European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems), from its scope ratione personae citizen of the Czech Republic, which, in circumstances such as those in the present case, before 1 First 1993 subject to the laws governing pension defunct State (Czech and Slovak Federal Republic), Acting in accordance with these periods sčlánkem 20 of the Treaty concluded on the 29th 10th 1992 between the Czech and Slovak republikouo Social Security registered in Annex III of Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 (Annex II of the European Parliament and Council Regulation No 883/2004) are regarded as periods Slovak Republic apodlevnitrostátního
rules created by the Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic at the same time as the time Czech Republic?
If an
article in this
Rules were to be declared or deemed illegal, unenforceable or invalid by a competent authority, then this
article would be considered null and non-written, but all other items would not be affected and would find
application in limits and authorized by law