Sentences with phrase «application rules only»

Not exact matches

So far, only two new licences have been approved this summer even as the department tightens the application rules — and as nervous investors await decisions on their multimillion - dollar bids.

Although Facebook's Terms of Service require that applications only collect and use information related to the app itself, enforcing this rule may be really difficult.

Still, the case against teleological ethics may here offer this response: Granting the difference between direct and indirect applications, this yields only the familiar distinction between «act - teleology» and «rule - teleology, «3 is problematic for the following reason: Social practices or patterns of social cooperation can not be validated teleologically without a comparative assessment of the good and evil consequences differing possible systems of rules or norms (for instance, differing sets of rights) are likely, if adopted, to produce.

He also cited section 396 (1) to (3) of the ACJ Act which stipulates that any application challenging the competence of criminal charges could only be considered along with the substantive issues in the case and ruling on it delivered along with the judgment on the entire case.

Campaigners claimed that, under the rules drawn up to decide which pre-1997 applications would be approved, only around 100 Gurkhas would qualify for residence.

Under the contest rules, each participating institution — including NIH institutes — can sponsor up to two candidates, but NIH only puts forward applications they expect to be competitive.

The National Institutes of Health is dropping a policy that gave researchers only one chance to revise a rejected grant application before having to start over with a new idea — a rule that was especially hard on young investigators.

4.6.2.4 - Uses and applications of electromagnetic waves (P6.8 lesson) Paper 2 topic 3 (4.7 - Magnetism and electromagnetism) 4.7.1.1 - Poles of a magnet (P7.1 lesson) 4.7.1.2 - Magnetic fields (P7.1 lesson) 4.7.2.1 — Electromagnetism (P7.2 lesson) 4.7.2.2 - Fleming's left - hand rule (HT only)(P7.3 lesson) 4.7.2.3 - Electric motors (HT only)(P7.3 lesson)

Just make sure you only use tools and applications that don't violate any social media platform rules or terms of service.

Mortgage & Auto industry has special rules for inquiries: all applications for credit resulting in pulled credit reports within a 14 day period of time will only count as one inquiry & will be suppressed from affecting credit scores for 30 days.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

I argued the angst over the new «5/24 rule» (meaning Chase only approving new UR cards for folks with no more than 5 credit card applications in the last 24 months) was misplaced because Ultimate Rewards no longer have the same cachet they used to, so there's not as much reason to care about churning Ultimate Rewards cards nowadays.

One of the American Express application rules that is very clear is that you're only allowed four total Amex credit cards at any given time.

Chase will now deny an application for both consumer cards (i.e. once you have one Southwest consumer card, you will not be approved for the other, similar to Chase's recent rule that you can only get the Chase Sapphire Reserve or Preferred, but not both).

They indicated that they already had the Chase Sapphire Reserve Card and had only opened 3 cards in the last 24 months so the application was not impacted by the Chase 5/24 Rule.

Chase will deny an application for both consumer cards (i.e. once you have one Southwest consumer card, you will not be approved for the other, similar to Chase's recent rule that you can only get the Chase Sapphire Reserve or Preferred, but not both).

Furthermore, with respect to any Product accessed through or downloaded from an App Store such as the Android Market, Apple App Store, Oculus Store, Steam, PlayStation Store, Xbox Store and so on (an «App Store Sourced Application»), you will only use the App Store Sourced Application: (i) on a product that runs the operating system for which it was intended and (ii) as permitted by the «Usage Rules» set forth in the corresponding App Store.

This test is identical to that applied on an application under Rule 9 - 5 (1)(a) and, as a result, it has been held that a Third Party Notice should only be set aside if there is no serious question or issue to be determined, the question or issue raised by the Third Party Notice is not substantially the same as a question or issue in the original action or the question or issue should not properly be determined in the original action: Northmark Mechanical Systems Inc. v. King (Estate), [2009] B.C.J. No. 1812, 2009 BCSC 1237.

You can become a citizen of Switzerland only by becoming a citizen of one of its cantons, and they all have their separate naturalization laws, and in some of them they leave the rules and decisions to local officials, and your application can get turned down because the mayor of the village thinks you look like a hippie.

Application of new rules before their entry into force can consequently be allowed «only in so far as it clearly follows from their terms, their objectives or their general scheme that such effect must be given to them» (para. 36).

One of the key features of its mission and unifying nomophylactic essentially aimed at ensuring certainty in the interpretation of the law is the fact that, in principle, the current rules do not allow the Supreme Court to know the facts of a case unless they prove by deeds already obtained in proceedings in the pre-trial stages, and only to the extent that it is necessary to know in order to assess the remedies that the law allows you to use to motivate an application at the Court.

The High Court agreed with the investors that § 10 (3) of the IAA did not apply to the current application, since it only permits the High Court to review a positive ruling on jurisdiction where this has been dealt with by the tribunal as a preliminary question.

The amendment also clarifies that the rule is of application only to convictions for violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4230 (a) and not for all offenses prescribed by § 4230.

As to what circumstances are likely to be relevant for this purpose, the Court of Appeal in Denton only referred to two in particular; the promptness of any application for relief and other past or current breaches of rules, practice directions and court orders.

In Marek v. Chesny, the Supreme Court in 1985 ruled that «costs» under Rule 68 do include attorney fees in a civil rights case brought under section 1983, although only in the context of the plaintiff's post-verdict application for fees under section 1988.

If brought to its logical conclusion, the Court's reasoning would not only outlaw the application of EU Law by any judicial body outside the European judicial hierarchy, but the application of any rules other than those of EU law in fields covered by EU Law.

What drove the repeated application of cold towels was the fear that we would be in constant touch with our professional indemnity insurers, quite apart from writing weekly apologies to our clients about the fact that yet again we had incurred a costs sanction for some apparently unforgiveable (even if only marginally wicked) breach of the rules.

One of the key features of its mis - sion and unifying nomophylactic essentially aimed at ensuring cer - tainty in the interpretation of the law is the fact that, in principle, the current rules do not allow the Supreme Court to know the facts of a case unless they prove by deeds already obtained in pro- ceedings in the pre-trial stages, and only to the extent that it is necessary to know in order to assess the remedies that the law allows you to use to motivate an application at the Court.

Dealing with cl 3.15, Etherton J ruled that it had no application on the basis that the obligation not to sue was only in relation to those obligations or liabilities that had been compromised or released.

The silver lining in this decision is that the application judge restricted his decision to the particular facts of the case before him, explaining that «this ruling is meant to apply only to the narrow factual situation before the Court; it is not to apply more broadly to allow any insured to obtain interest on amounts left unapplied for after 104 weeks.»

I know I am only an attack dog in training - pardon me, I should say student at law — but my reading of the conflicts section of the Ontario Rules of Professional Conduct does not support such a broad application.

I think the point she's making is that the processes used in BC and NB would only be appropriate if they were performing an quasi-legislative role (i.e., in the example I gave earlier, establishing new rules of professional conduct or by - laws, or making rules of general application).

The Penal Rule in favour of a defendant where ambiguity exists would certainly work; but that's only likely to come up at a hearing, well after any application of the Regulation have already occurred.

[20] In this case, although the offer was open for only a relatively short period of time, it was presented just before trial, when all discovery of documents and examinations for discovery had been completed, and when the issues had been fully aired in a Rule 18A application for judgment brought by the defendants.

Although, according to the rules, you or a representative may fill out the initial application, (about twenty minutes online at www.ssa.gov) the online application only starts the process.

The application in this case was only an effort to stall implementation of the policy and did not rule on the policy's overall validity.

Article 27 (1) Where the immediate appeal referred to in paragraph (4) of Article 35 (Inspection, etc. of the Portion related to the Examination of the Facts) of the Act is filed, if the court of prior instance finds no need to forward the record of the case pertaining to personal status litigation, it is sufficient for a court clerk of the court of prior instance to forward only the record of the appeal case to a court clerk of the court in charge of the appeal, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 174 (Forwarding of Record due to Filing of Appeal to Second Instance) of the Rules of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 205 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance or Final Appeal) of said Rules.

The Mauritius Convention will extend the application of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency, which so far have a very limited scope of application (only to UNCITRAL investor - State arbitrations that are based on treaties concluded on or after 1 April 2014), potentially to the entire treaty - based international investment regime as it stood on 1 April 2014.

For example, if a defendant served a Rule 49 Offer to Settle of $ 40,000 plus costs prior to trial, and the plaintiff was awarded $ 50,000 in damages, the defendant would, after application of the $ 30,000 deductible, only be required to pay $ 20,000 in damages.

The application of disclaimers to email, as referenced at the top of page 8, is interesting, insofar as it will trigger the recipient lawyer's responsibilities under Rule 4.4 — with respect to data security, most people think only of the obligation of the sender; but, lawyers are a special case.

As a result, not only did Madam Justice Corthorn conclude that the matter would have to return before her at a later date, she also concluded that the Rules required the application to proceed by way of an oral hearing rather than in writing.

But what it means in practice is that the only reason today that Article III judges must defer to the D.C. Court of Appeals on questions of D.C. law is because the D.C. Circuit itself has said so — and so stare decisis, and not the Rules of Decision Act or principles of federalism — carries all the weight (and would not bind federal courts outside of the D.C. Circuit in diversity cases in which choice - of - law rules compel application of D.C. substantive Rules of Decision Act or principles of federalism — carries all the weight (and would not bind federal courts outside of the D.C. Circuit in diversity cases in which choice - of - law rules compel application of D.C. substantive rules compel application of D.C. substantive law).

Applications for orders and damages go only to the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, using the usual processes for applications under the complicated civil procApplications for orders and damages go only to the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, using the usual processes for applications under the complicated civil procapplications under the complicated civil procedure rules.

Not only will the application of the exclusionary rule depend on a wide range of considerations, other rules of evidence may need to be applied (such as the rules against character evidence and extrinsic evidence on a collateral matter).

In these cases, it is not only necessary to purchase missionary travel insurance, but it is also mandated by visa application rules.

Facebook wouldn't comment on those questions, saying only that it has made significant improvements in its ability to «detect and prevent violations» by app developers, such as random audits of applications using its tools to make sure they're following the rules.

Although Facebook's Terms of Service require that applications only collect and use information related to the app itself, enforcing this rule may be really difficult.

Lest there be any doubt as to the clear intent of the FDIA rules, the FDIC also states in no uncertain terms that ``... a pre-employment background screening process should be established by all financial institutions that, at a minimum, uncovers information regarding a job applicant's convictions and program entries to ensure that only appropriate persons are employed, or that an application for FDIC consent is sought, if applicable..»

Not only must a civilised country conduct its affairs by the rule of law, but the law must be just in its compilation and just in its application.

In our application, we have asked the Competition Tribunal to order CREA to do away, once and for all, with rules that severely limit the ability of consumers to select which real estate services they want and to pay only for those services.