Sentences with phrase «applications under the patent»

«The government clearly heard our perspective and adopted a balanced approach: There will be limited patent - term extensions in specified circumstances and a so - called «right of appeal» for brand - name manufacturers in applications under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations.»

by: Kevin P. Siu What happens when a patentee is unsuccessful in a prohibition application under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance)(PMNOC) Regulations against a generic entrant, but subsequently prevails in an infringement action on the same patent?

Not exact matches

a Patent Application Declaration — a statement under oath that the information in the application iApplication Declaration — a statement under oath that the information in the application iapplication is true, and

Slavitt said EpiPen has patent protection, has no Food and Drug Administration - approved equivalents, and was approved by that agency under a «new drug application,» all of which make it a brand - name drug.

«The EU Patent & Trademark Office officially published two Apple trademark applications for «Lightning» under numbers 011399821 / 862,» according to Patently Apple.

Under most circumstances, that would conclude the legal story as several Canadian courts reviewed Eli Lilly's patent applications and ruled that they failed to meet the standards for patentability.

Under this initiative, FinTech patents can be expected to be granted in as quickly as six months, compared to at least two years for normal applications.

One source of disagreement is how much Cold Spring Harbor actually knew about what was in the patent applications; while its lawsuit claims that Hannon didn't know about the copying until March 2008, when a Cold Spring Harbor attorney informed him of the news, Ropes & Gray says that «Dr. Hannon (along with his four co-inventors) signed declarations under oath... confirming that each application accurately disclosed the work for which they were seeking patent protection.»

That has triggered an epic legal battle over CRISPR intellectual property (IP) that centers on the Broad Institute's issued patents and a patent application from UC that's still under review.

Under Section 22 of the Patents Act, the Patent Office's security division in Newport must slap a secrecy order on any application that prejudices the defence of the realm or public safety, including patent applications for defence invenPatent Office's security division in Newport must slap a secrecy order on any application that prejudices the defence of the realm or public safety, including patent applications for defence invenpatent applications for defence inventions.

So, while U.S. law still provides an incentive to publish as a way of establishing an invention, under European patent law people who publish before they file a patent application aren't protected.

Historically, academic technology transfer offices (TTOs) have trained their academic scientists not to publish before filing a patent application, because under the previous system any disclosure by themselves or others, even one day prior to filing a patent application, could legally eliminate the possibility of patenting the invention in major non-U.S. countries.

E.V.: Such people can qualify as a micro-entity and enjoy a 75 % reduction on some patent - related government fees if they can certify: (1) that their employer, from whom the majority of his / her income is obtained, is an institution of higher education as defined in the Higher Education Act of 1965; or (2) the applicant has assigned, granted, or conveyed, or is under an obligation to assign, grant, or convey, an ownership interest in the application to such an institution of higher education.

E.V.: Under the old system, TTOs encouraged their academic scientists to maintain good records of their conception and reduction - to - practice of an invention, in case a patent or patent application was pulled into a patent interference used to determine who invented it first.

For example, the long - standing practice of filing a series of provisional patent applications that could later be combined into a singe utility patent application appears to be even more favored under the FITF system.

Alternatively, whenever an inventor believes someone else has already filed or is about to file a patent application on an invention that they invented earlier, then they should consider filing an application for that invention before 15 March 2013 so that it will still fall under the old FTI system.

Under the AIA, academic scientists (and others) will now have 6 months from the publication of a patent application (by others) to submit prior art (e.g., disclosures, publications) that they believe the examiner should consider.

Only 316 of the 925 applications filed under the agency's Green Technology Pilot Program launched in December have qualified to jump to the front of the patent - examination line.

An application for a patent, which will belong to MIT, is under way.

Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Spring Design will grant Barnes & Noble a non-exclusive, paid - up royalty free license for the entire portfolio of Spring Design patents and patent applications.

Blog posts cover topics such as procedures for filing and prosecuting patent applications under the new AIA rules, post-grant proceedings before the PTAB including post-grant review of covered business method patents and inter partes review, and supplemental examination procedures now available to patent owners.

Under the pilot program, inventors can opt to have their patent applications posted on the www.peertopatent.org website.

Under first - to - file, however, an invention may wind up being worthless unless one submits an airtight patent application with sound, defensible claims as soon as possible.

Patents could be granted 90 days after applications are filed under UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) plans to introduce a «superfast» patent processing service.

Also, it will accept applications for a broader range of patents from the business - methods and software patents covered under the first pilot; it will now include biotechnology, biopharmaceuticals, telecommunications and speech recognition technology.

Represented AbbVie against Amgen in patent infringement litigation and inter partes reviews related to Amgen's FDA application for a biosimilar (generic) version of Humira (adalimumab) under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA).

Under a PPH request, the patent office examining the second application takes into account (hopefully with a favourable view) the examination history of the first application.

«RECALLING the obligations of the Contracting Member States under the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), including the obligation of sincere cooperation as set out in Article 4 (3) TEU and the obligation to ensure through the Unified Patent Court the full application of, and respect for, Union law in their respective territories and the judicial protection of an individual's rights under that law;

In contrast, under the «New Act», including patent applications filed today, a divisional patent, deemed to have the same filing date as the original, expires on the same day as the original patent, regardless of when it is granted.

File one divisional under A36 EPC (European Patent Convention) application (cutting the content of the application to reasonable minimum is advisable in the view of future translation);

Under the PPH, an applicant with allowable claims in either a US or Canadian patent application may request that the other country's patent office provide a fast track examination to the corresponding application.

Canada's Commissioner of Patents denied the patent application on the grounds that a business method could not be patented under Canadian law.

The plans outlined in the patent application show a two - layered glove: The outer layer is weatherproof, but under a removable cap on your typing fingertips is a second layer that simulates the electrical feedback of human skin.

We speak with George Schlich for a selection of best practice pointers under the law of the European Patent Office (EPO) on how to get the most out of patent applications, especially Patent Office (EPO) on how to get the most out of patent applications, especially patent applications, especially the...

We speak with George Schlich for a selection of best practice pointers under the law of the European Patent Office (EPO) on how to get the most out of patent applications, especially the «first filing» that establishes a priority date for and sets the framework for future patent rPatent Office (EPO) on how to get the most out of patent applications, especially the «first filing» that establishes a priority date for and sets the framework for future patent rpatent applications, especially the «first filing» that establishes a priority date for and sets the framework for future patent rpatent rights.

Under the amendments, the grace period will be allowed to run to one year before the priority date, such that the invention can still be patented if its priority application was filed within one year of the disclosure.

The number of applications made under the Patent Co-operation Treaty has risen by 19 %, from nearly 12,000 in 2011 to more than 14,000 in 2012.

He also has an important post that you really should read if you use Trademark Electronic Application System, or TEAS, in your work: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is proposing a couple of rule changes, including a provision for TEAS users who want «to file a trademark or service mark application for registration on the Principal Register under section 1 and / or 44 of the act to pay a reduced fee under certain circumstanApplication System, or TEAS, in your work: The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is proposing a couple of rule changes, including a provision for TEAS users who want «to file a trademark or service mark application for registration on the Principal Register under section 1 and / or 44 of the act to pay a reduced fee under certain circumstanapplication for registration on the Principal Register under section 1 and / or 44 of the act to pay a reduced fee under certain circumstances.»

In November 2013, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office («USPTO») proposed new regulations covering applications eventually filed under the Hague Agreement.

The lawyer — despite being under a nondisclosure agreement — subsequently changed a Merck patent application that was in the works, narrowing the applied - for patent claims to cover what the other company disclosed, Dutra explains.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that a plaintiff not named as a joint inventor on several patents and pending patent applications has standing to maintain an action to correct inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 256, despite the fact that he previously assigned all rights...

However, under the Patent Prosecution Highway, participating patent offices have agreed that when an applicant receives a final ruling from the patent office of one country, and that office determines that at least one claim is allowed, the applicant may then request fast tracked examination of corresponding claims in a corresponding patent application that is pending in the patent office of another coPatent Prosecution Highway, participating patent offices have agreed that when an applicant receives a final ruling from the patent office of one country, and that office determines that at least one claim is allowed, the applicant may then request fast tracked examination of corresponding claims in a corresponding patent application that is pending in the patent office of another copatent offices have agreed that when an applicant receives a final ruling from the patent office of one country, and that office determines that at least one claim is allowed, the applicant may then request fast tracked examination of corresponding claims in a corresponding patent application that is pending in the patent office of another copatent office of one country, and that office determines that at least one claim is allowed, the applicant may then request fast tracked examination of corresponding claims in a corresponding patent application that is pending in the patent office of another copatent application that is pending in the patent office of another copatent office of another country.

The plaintiff in the challenge had been issued patents in the late 1970s based on an application from 1959, but on the eve of jury trial in 1982, the case had been continued pending a reexamination under the new statute.

I'm so very skeptical because the USPTO has taken a long time since the filing of the reexamination requests to issue this Office action and, which is far more meaningful, it has determined that this design patent's single claim «stands twice rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a)[obviousness], rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 (a) / 102 (e)[obviousness in connection with a published patent application], and rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (e).»

If your application requires use of ZIP technology that is covered under a patent, PKWARE does provide reasonable and non discriminatory licensing.

For an application filed on or after March 16, 2013, the effective filing date of a claimed invention is the earlier of: (1) the actual filing date of the patent or the application for patent containing the claimed invention; or (2) the filing date of the earliest application for which the patent or application is entitled, as to such invention, to a right of priority or the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. 119, 120, 121, or 365.

, on a proper application of European law, there could only be one answer as to whether or not the Defendants» rights under the Patent in respect of the Vessel had been exhausted.

Bob has years of experience working with foreign patent counsel the world over prosecuting patent applications in foreign countries for U.S. clients as well as prosecuting patent applications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Propatent counsel the world over prosecuting patent applications in foreign countries for U.S. clients as well as prosecuting patent applications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Propatent applications in foreign countries for U.S. clients as well as prosecuting patent applications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industriapplications in foreign countries for U.S. clients as well as prosecuting patent applications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Propatent applications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industriapplications in the U.S. made in foreign countries, based on International Applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of IndustriApplications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial ProPatent Cooperation Treaty or priority filings under the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property.

You can file one application to gain patent protection in up to 146 countries under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and trademark protection in any of the 88 countries participating in the Madrid Propatent protection in up to 146 countries under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and trademark protection in any of the 88 countries participating in the Madrid ProPatent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and trademark protection in any of the 88 countries participating in the Madrid Protocol.

During examination, a patent application is under review and claims may be amended; patent applications (unlike issued patents that have been accepted by an Examiner) are not presumed to be valid.