Sentences with phrase «applied the law to the facts before»
The letter analysed the relevant law and applied the law to the facts before asking for RBS's position on those facts.
https://www.burges-salmon.com/ Not exact matches
«The point is, we've looked at the facts of this case before us and we've applied the law and the tests that parliament said — and we've come to a very clear conclusion in this matter.»
I want to make sure I have all the required documentation, but I'd like to see some examples of what to place in the section that says: «Any details about the conduct of the school that the borrower believes violated state law» I attended DeVry in Washington statue until 2010 and want to make sure I have all my facts straight before applying for loan discharge.
That is why courts exist, to apply current law to the facts as it determines them, in the case before it.
Sometimes government officials enforce laws that have been held unconstitutional, either because they aren't aware of the relevant court decisions, or because they think that their facts are distinguishable from those under which the law was held unconstitutional (which sometimes happens on an «as applied» basis rather than on a «facial» basis that applies to all cases), or because they think the judge before them might rule differently despite the precedent.
In deciding which standard to apply, the reviewing judge will also consider whether the nature of the question before it is one of fact or law.
It is important that you hear all of the facts and that you hear the law and how to apply it before you start deciding anything.
Consequently, make your findings of fact before you turn to applying the law to the facts.
We know that the legislature's role is to write the laws and that judges are to interpret that legislation as applied to facts in the case before them.
As before, applying the law to the facts may be difficult in certain cases.
The correct procedure would have been to make a finding of fact before attempting to apply the law.
In doing so, the CRTC risks pre-empting the true role of commissioners — which is to make independent decisions based on the facts before them and applying the law with impartiality.