There's a split over whether federal courts exercising bankruptcy jurisdiction should
apply federal choice - of - law principles or the choice - of - law principles of the forum state.
Not exact matches
DPI explained — accurately — that most
federal civil rights laws do not
apply to private schools participating in the Milwaukee school
choice program.
But as with the Blaine amendments, as I said, these can be construed — they don't have to be, and frequently have not been, but they can be construed — in just the same way that the opponents of parental
choice programs wanted the
federal Establishment Clause construed, and would like the Blaine amendments construed, namely, to
apply to assistance to families that use that assistance to attend a religious school, in a free and independent
choice.
In responding to the Idaho Education News article, the state department of education's spokesperson on school
choice issues said the state no longer
applies for
federal charter school start - up dollars because the feds «want states to have a plan in place to close down low - performing charter schools.
However, if you depend on income - based repayment plans or intend to
apply for forgiveness through the
federal government, then refinancing may not be a smart
choice for you.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the
federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall
apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the
choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).
As for
applying AEDPA, a state court judge would be a better
choice than a
federal court of appeals judge.
The court, tackling
choice of law rules to determine applicable state law to analyze the preclusive effect of the prior court decisions, embraced the notion that «nationwide uniformity in the substance of the matter is better served by having the same - preclusive rule (the state rule)
apply whether the dismissal ordered by a state or a
federal court... [Thus, the court adopts] the law that would be
applied by state courts in the State in which the
federal diversity court sits.»)
Many
Federal announcements have additional multiple
choice questions for applicants to
apply for jobs.
Those who are serious about making the right resume
choices when
applying for a
Federal position often seek the help of resume services.
A
federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction will
apply the
choice of law provision for the state in which the court is physically located.