Sentences with phrase «apply in this case because»

The book's description of GIFT is accurate, but to say that the Church's prohibition of artificial insemination doesn't apply in this case because what is inserted into the recipient woman is no longer only sperm but a catheter containing both a retrieved egg and sperm retrieved after intercourse only lays Catholic bioethics open to the charge that it is based on an arbitrary set of boundaries discernible only to the well initiated.

The lead attorney representing the plaintiffs argued that this rule does not apply in this case because «the exception to this policy is where the officer personally committed a tort: a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract) leading to civil legal liability.»

According to the closeout memo, the OIG concluded that this section of the FOIA did not apply in this case because the NSF is not a rules - making body but rather devoted to research and education.

57 The Commission was correct to conclude that the presumption against retrospective application did not apply in this case because administrative penalties under the Act are not punitive but are instead designed to protect the public: Brosseau v. Alberta Securities Commission -LSB-...].

It is important to be aware of the statue of limitations that applies in your case because if it expires, you may not be able to pursue any legal action against the responsible party.

However, that limitation did not apply in this case because he was represented at the time of the hearing.

[10] The appellant also argued that the limitation clause should not apply in this case because it did not expressly name employees and officers of the corporation and was therefore ambiguous and subject to the application of the principle of contra proferentem.

Not exact matches

It could be that because we've brought more cases in the last few years against some well - known names that that's interpreted as a crackdown, but that's simply more a reflection of the fact that time has gone by since we've updated the guides in 2009 to make it clear it applies to social media marketing.

«The court rejected (the plaintiff's) theory that the newspaper's publication violated her right to privacy because her post to MySpace was made virtually to everyone with an internet connection,» Zaller wrote in a blog post two years ago, asserting the case could apply to situations of employees posting on social media.

This decision probably shouldn't have been a surprise, because it basically said that the court's 2010 decision in the Citizens United case, upholding the right of corporations to spend money in federal elections, applies to the states as well.

As my PaidContent colleague Jeff John Roberts reported last month, Harris» attempt to have this court order struck down failed for a somewhat unusual reason: namely, the judge hearing the case decided that Harris did not have any legal interest in the tweets he sent, because such rights only apply to things a user actually owns — and users do not own their tweets for the purposes of the U.S. Constitution.

In most cases, clickthrough rates on broad match keywords are much lower than on other keyword match types too, because many people click to see if the search listing applies to them only to realize that it was not what they were looking for.

We do not question the appropriateness of the term as applied to him, but, on the example of Samuel and Nathan, we suspect that if he was called a prophet by his contemporaries it was, again, because of regularized status as a professional, in this case presumably membership in an association of prophets at or near Shiloh.

You can't claim this is a violation of your 1st amendment rights, because you are not acting in this case as an individual, but as an agent of the corporation, and the rules governing the corporation apply.

In the North Wales case, because the baby's mother — his only legally recognised parent — had died, the child protection system was invoked and applied to the grieving father.

But the park district contends in its petition filed Friday with the Illinois Appellate Court that the statute of limitations does not apply to this case because the transfer was illegal, and that Glenview and Northbrook would not suffer harm if they gave the land back, according to spokesmen for Friedman & Holtz, a Chicago law firm representing the Northfield Park District.

Because at the time I started this blog, I made a distinction between «mothering» and «fathering» that in some cases does not apply.

Hunter Thompson once said that history is hard to know, because of all the hired bullsh*t, and in this case I think that rule applies to the future as well.

«The imposition of such automatic penalties could have the consequences of making the courts less receptive to arguments that the GAAR applies, because in marginal cases they may consider the imposition of such penalties to be unfair.

In his own submission, counsel to Aminu Baba - Kusa, a former Executive at NNPC, Mr. Solomon Umor informed Justice Baba Yusuf that «ordinarily the prosecution ought to apply for a bench warrant against Dasuki for a failure to appear in court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioIn his own submission, counsel to Aminu Baba - Kusa, a former Executive at NNPC, Mr. Solomon Umor informed Justice Baba Yusuf that «ordinarily the prosecution ought to apply for a bench warrant against Dasuki for a failure to appear in court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioin court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioin the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detention.

In his own submission, counsel to Aminu Baba - Kusa, aformer Executive at NNPC, Mr Solomon Umor informed Justice Baba Yusuf that «ordinarily the prosecution ought to apply for a bench warrant against Dasuki for a failure to appear in court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioIn his own submission, counsel to Aminu Baba - Kusa, aformer Executive at NNPC, Mr Solomon Umor informed Justice Baba Yusuf that «ordinarily the prosecution ought to apply for a bench warrant against Dasuki for a failure to appear in court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioin court for trial but noted that in the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detentioin the instance case, the prosecution would not do so because they are the one responsible for the absence of Dasuki because of his unwarranted detention.

Levy's current chief deputy county executive, Ed Dumas, wrote in a June 28 memo he e-mailed to a reporter that the appellate court case did not apply to Levy's situation because state law would trump county law in his case.

It is a 419 case instituted by 419 Lawyer, the case can not succeed because Lagos state like any other State in the federation has her own State's Laws that were applied to deport destitutes who have turned themselves into nuisance on the streets of Lagos back to their states of origin.

[31] However, because most free college proposals in the U.S. include an income cutoff around $ 125,000 for upper - income students, free college would not apply to these students, as is the case in Chile.

But thousands more won't look in their mailboxes at all, because they have not applied to, or in many cases even considered, higher education.

He said: «There are very generous bursaries in some areas and we should look at making them available to all trainee teachers, not just for those with first - class degrees in particular subjects... It is right to incentivise recruitment in particular subjects but there is a case for across - the - board bursaries, because we want good people applying in all subjects.»

The U.S. Supreme Court later applied similar reasoning in the 2011 case ACSTO v. Winn, rejecting the standing of petitioners to challenge Arizona's scholarship tax - credit law because the funds did not become public money since they had not «come into the tax collector's hands.»

«It is right to incentivise recruitment in particular subjects but there is a case for across - the - board bursaries, because we want good people applying in all subjects.»

A source close to Mr Gove said delays had occurred because every school which applied for funds had been visited to verify its needs, unlike in the case of BSF.

It applies to self - publishing because there will ALWAYS be gaps that need filling in the market, just as there will ALWAYS be cases where one book's (or movie's) runaway success creates a short - term exaggerated demand for comparable products.

In the vast majority of cases, Hachette authors would not be entitled to even that $ 1.75, because those royalties would be applied to paying back their initial book advances.

Because of the up mentioned aspects, here is what we can conclude by now: the warranty of your Samsung Galaxy S4 will not get void by updating to official Jelly Bean 4.2.2 XXUAMDL OS; also you don't need to have a rooted smartphone because you are not flashing a custom ROM; but in case your device is rooted, then after performing the steps from below, the root access will be revoked (you will be able to unchain the system of your handset by applying a new root guide that is suitable with the new XXUAMDL software); finally if your SGS4 is currently running on a custom OS, now you will be able to restore the stock Jelly Bean firmware and also you will be able to restore its waBecause of the up mentioned aspects, here is what we can conclude by now: the warranty of your Samsung Galaxy S4 will not get void by updating to official Jelly Bean 4.2.2 XXUAMDL OS; also you don't need to have a rooted smartphone because you are not flashing a custom ROM; but in case your device is rooted, then after performing the steps from below, the root access will be revoked (you will be able to unchain the system of your handset by applying a new root guide that is suitable with the new XXUAMDL software); finally if your SGS4 is currently running on a custom OS, now you will be able to restore the stock Jelly Bean firmware and also you will be able to restore its wabecause you are not flashing a custom ROM; but in case your device is rooted, then after performing the steps from below, the root access will be revoked (you will be able to unchain the system of your handset by applying a new root guide that is suitable with the new XXUAMDL software); finally if your SGS4 is currently running on a custom OS, now you will be able to restore the stock Jelly Bean firmware and also you will be able to restore its warranty.

I could have marked the second one p.Text - break, because in fact it's a style that I apply to whole paragraphs — in the case of «White Robes,» paragraphs that contain a single em - dash to be used as a separator between sections of text.

In many cases, applicants are denied because they've applied for the wrong card.

CGT relief is not required in this case because gains on such assets would already be exempt to the extent that current exemption rules apply.

In that case, the policy says right in the definitions section that you're both covered, because coverage applies to the named insured and resident relativeIn that case, the policy says right in the definitions section that you're both covered, because coverage applies to the named insured and resident relativein the definitions section that you're both covered, because coverage applies to the named insured and resident relatives.

In this case, since you are revolving the balance transfer's balance every month this roll doesn't apply because you aren't paying the statement balance each month so everything outside of the promotion accrues interest.

In many cases, business owners who apply for traditional business loans are turned down simply because they aren't looking for loans large enough for the lender to see them as being worthwhile.

This case does not apply to today because the Medium - Long Term Model foresees neither a significant correction nor a bear market in 2018.

But generally speaking, the later you can wait to collect CPP, the better, and this applies double in your case because you've only contributed to the plan for 14 years so far.

However, rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and the FTC give consumers the right, in some cases, to receive credit scores when applying for credit or a notice that credit has been approved but that the consumer did not receive the most favorable credit terms because of the credit score.

From 1995 through the first part of 2008, the historical data supported a stock allocation of about 20 or 30 percent in the typical case (because the long - term value proposition is so poor at the prices that applied during that time).

Such thinking is insane, yet such thinking is exactly what we apply in the case of animals being murdered, and because of our human animal egotism, selfishness and arrogance, we allow to be done to other animals, what we would be outraged at, if it were done to US or to someone WE loved.

I really hope that's not the case because I have read several blogs that say with each card that you apply for including the plus & premier you should be getting a bonus for each card resulting in multiple bonuses ranging from 40,000 to 60,000 points.

So, in case there is now or there will be some newbie to these arguments who may have been confused by the disinformation you (and Memphis) have been producing here, here is an example from a genuine study to remind of what the AGWSF fisics passes off as real physics, as used generally in all the variety of science studies because this has been introduced into the education system and, apart from the applied scientists in the field who can spot this is fake, the majority simply take it as if real physics basics:

Can you find some Law that can be applied in the case of airplanes using fuels with confidential formulas, only because these fuels are in use by military (but are also being used in civil aviation)?

It first repeated its case law on international jurisdiction, stating that because the directive only applies to aircraft landing and departing from EU territory, the directive is in line with the principle of territoriality:

Because in this case both statutory decision makers (ie the Standards Board and the Adjudication Panel) comprise persons identified by Parliament «because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal&Because in this case both statutory decision makers (ie the Standards Board and the Adjudication Panel) comprise persons identified by Parliament «because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal&because of their experience knowledge and position to apply the relevant Code», therefore «absent an error of law the court is to pay considerable respect to the decision of what is an informed domestic tribunal».

As noted by Professor Peers, the «case should never have arisen at all, because the Austrian officials concerned should have seen the obvious human problems at stake in this case and applied the humanitarian clauses in the law as they were always intended to be used».

In these three orders, the SCC concluded that the constitutional questions did not meet the relevance test because, under the principle of primacy of EU law, a national provision that is found to be incompatible with EU law must be displaced and can not be applied by the national courts when deciding a case.