Not exact matches
The Canadian Judicial Council panel's ruling released Aug. 20, states that
questioning by the committee's counsel, George Macintosh,
of witnesses Michael Sinclair, former managing partner
of Douglas» former law firm, and
of her husband Jack King, «created a reasonable
apprehension of bias on part
of members
of the committee.»
Indeed an allegation
of reasonable
apprehension of bias calls into
question not simply the personal integrity
of the judge, but the integrity
of the entire administration
of justice.
For instance, the
question whether overlapping functions which would ordinarily create an
apprehension of bias are authorized by statute would naturally fall in the deferential home statute category.
The court noted that the third area
of proposed
questioning was not relevant, since a continuing relationship to the former firm was not part
of the allegation
of apprehension of bias raised by PowerServe.
The case reached the Supreme Court on the
question of whether these comments gave rise to a reasonable
apprehension of bias — a divided Court issued four separate sets
of reasons.