Sentences with phrase «approach than his critics»

There was more substance to his approach than his critics have conceded.

Not exact matches

In conclusion, We must approach the Bible as it being higher than us, not as critics apporaching something that is on a lower level.

If we equate de facto ketogenic diets with high - protein diets (which is not always correct) then the risks proposed by critics of this type of dietary approach are essentially those of possible kidney damage due to high levels of nitrogen excretion during protein metabolism, which can cause an increase in glomerular pressure and hyperfiltration.12 There is not wide agreement between studies; however, some infer the possibility of renal damage from animal studies, 99, 100 whereas others, looking at both animal models, meta - analyses and human studies, propose that even high levels of protein in the diet do not damage renal function.101, 102 In subjects with intact renal function, higher dietary protein levels caused some functional and morphological adaptations without negative effects.103 There may actually be renal - related effects, but on blood pressure rather than morphological damage.

Critic Consensus: Megan Leavey honors its real - life subjects with a sensitive, uplifting drama whose honest emotion more than makes up for its mild approach to the story.

Yes, I know it's incredibly devastating (heh) when our personal favourites aren't given every single award there is, but you might want to find a more focused approach in pointing out why this critic or that awards body is so incredibly misguided and why you're so much more sophisticated than them.

Critics Consensus: Megan Leavey honors its real - life subjects with a sensitive, uplifting drama whose honest emotion more than makes up for its mild approach to the story.

I love a good popcorn superhero movie as much as the next guy (maybe even more than most critics), but «Logan» shows how deep one can go in the genre if they just approach it in a different way.

Critics see the combination of program accreditation standards, revised by the National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) in 2000; a growing curricular emphasis on «social justice» issues; and a left - leaning education professoriate as yielding a one - sided approach to teacher education and the certification of teachers based on ideology, rather than teaching skills or mastery of content knowledge.

But critics of the approach have called it nothing more than a high - tech, time - shifting tool that often leaves students confused about the content they're supposed to be absorbing at home.

Mark Rothko committed suicide in 1970, by which time younger groups of American artists had rejected the painterly qualities and the passion of expressionism in favour of a cooler approach, either pop art figuration or, in a less than resonant umbrella title coined by the critic Clement Greenberg, post-painterly abstraction.

During the years of studying Merleau - Ponty's philosophy I have realized that his indirect ontology, operating via ongoing questioning rather than providing answers, is related to Reinhardt's approach to art, applying questions and negation, not in an antagonistic or nihilistic way (as it was perceived by many artists and critics of his time), but rather in a thought - provoking and challenging manner.

Critics said the finding was contrary to the government's approach, which is to pass tougher laws and impose harsher penalties rather than to cultivate a better - informed public.

She begins by saying self - control, grit, and curiosity are beginning to be more frequently taught (sentence 1); she then says that researchers are finding these types of things even more important than intelligence to success in school (sentence 2); then says there are critics to this general approach (sentence 3); and then in the second paragraph says that Poropat has established with strong evidence that this broad approach (self - control, conscientiousness, etc) are highly correlated, and hence she is offering powerful evidence rebutting the critics identified in the third sentence, but not challenging the teaching identified in the first sentence.