I approached this game review as a parent, and I must say this game needs to be approached with caution.
Not exact matches
Calum Petrie
reviews The LEGO Ninjago Movie Video
Game... The LEGO
games have been around for a good few years now, often taking on a comical and lighthearted
approach to the source material and its licensed properties.
When I was
approaching my 100th
review, I wanted to do something special so I decided to
review my favourite
game of all time.
For example, if a student wants to design video
games but lacks the aptitude to get into a corresponding program, the school team might suggest exploring lateral ways to
approach the industry, such as video editing as a means to start a
game review channel (which that student might even be able to monetize).
These SoFi
reviews talk about how the innovative
approach of SoFi is changing the online loans — and specifically, the student loan refinancing —
game.
Take the beginning of the Games TM
review which clearly higlights a radically different
approach to
reviewing a
game than my own.
I'd respond by saying that this since this is a
game review it can't just be limited to «it's supposed to appeal to those that still play Mashed»
approach.
I'm trying to keep my expectations level, the same
approach I take to any
game these days, be it one I intend on
reviewing or not, because I find that's the best thing to do.
As I said this book doesn't follow that
approach, what it does do is cover the modern
game development cycle, a brief software engineering
review, a c++
review and a very nice math primer in the first 4 chapters.
I always try to
approach reviews without preconceptions, but every once in a while, you just know that a
game is going to suck at first glance.
I think you're really right about the fact that there are two
approaches to
reviewing something: how a
game made you feel personally versus how the
game stacks up against «standard criteria.»
I've never thought that reviewers had some kind of obligation to beat a
game before
reviewing it, but I've always liked to be at least
approaching the end before
reviewing.
The broader context for it is a video by John Bain (nee Total Biscuit) that's ostensibly appealing for critics to be more objective in their
approach to video
game reviews.
We also discuss his
approach to writing
reviews — how he tries to capture the experience of playing a
game and to explain in a tangible way exactly what makes a
game compelling to him — plus the various implications of attaching scores to
reviews.
Quite an interesting name and
approach for
reviewing / discussing
games.
After release, director Motomu Toriyama felt that the lower - than - expected
review scores for a main Final Fantasy series
game came from reviewers who
approached the
game from a Western point of view.
As such, this
review approaches Street Fighter V from how the
game plays in its pre-launch state.
Occasionally though, I'll have to
review a
game that leaves me befuddled with how I'm going to
approach it.
The
game's September 15 release date is fast
approaching, so stay tuned to GamesRadar + for the definitive Forza Motorsport 6
review.
This is a fault of the reviewer in question rather than a given of
reviews — reviewers need to be more comprehensive in their
approach by either having an intimate understanding of the
game's politics, or stating that they are
reviewing this as an outsider.
I believe that a
game review consisting only of numbered scores is untrustworthy — there is no elaboration, no written
approach to how these scores were tallied.
Keep an eye on this site as the
game approaches its February 14 U.S. release date for our full
review.
«The Quest to
Review Every NES
Game» was more of a freewheeling, humorous romp through the North American NES library, but I've tried to aim for a more measured and consistent
approach with Sega Does
reviews.
This is basically what it sounded like in my head when I was
approached with
reviewing (for a second time) the newest Tomb Raider
game, but this time it was on the rather lonely and dusty PS4, because let's face it people, the launch line - up for either machines were not all that great.
When we
reviewed the original Total War: Warhammer title, we appraised the
game rather highly thanks to its creative
approach using the Warhammer setting, and the races that lie within.
As they
approached the home stretch, celebrity friend Nich Maragos had offered to contribute a monthly
review of upcoming
game releases.
Thomas Roach
reviews Far Cry Primal... Whilst most franchises are moving forward in time and taking a futuristic
approach in their setting, it is refreshing to see a
game take a step back from that and go the opposite way.
I am quickly
approaching 150 video
game reviews here at the Dojo (my count is currently sitting at 133), and I recently came up with an idea.
It's even more fascinating yet, that with a global
review embargo lifting in just two days» time, an already taxed for time editor like myself (with E3 quickly
approaching) is depleting his stock of words — of thoughts — to preview the
game's multiplayer.
And even if you do nt currently plan on joining the freelancer ranks, his detailed
approach to
reviews will have you thinking more critically of the
games you play every day.
With the PlayStation Vita's 22 February launch rapidly
approaching, and
review machines running many of the launch
games already in the hands of journalists, Sony's next - generation handheld is now very much a known quantity — and first impressions are very good indeed.
However, with the year quickly coming to an end and 2017
approaching at a rapid pace, we find ourselves anxiously
reviewing several of our indie «prince that was promised»
games (to nerdily quote
Game of Thrones).
The Warsaw outcome mentions for the first time «nationally determined contributions» to reducing GHG emissions, reflecting a step away from a global budget
approach (whereby we say that the supposedly «safe» temperature increase of 2 degrees could only be achieved if we emit X amount of carbon, and the
game is to then decide who can emit what share) to a «pledge and
review»
approach (Whereby countries «pledge» to do what is «nationally appropriate» given their circumstances).
When one considers that their resume can be one of dozens (or even hundreds) of resumes that someone has to
review, you'll see that the
game changes with how a resume project needs to be
approached.