Culturally responsive pedagogy is a student - centered
approach to teaching in which the students» unique cultural strengths are identified and nurtured to promote student achievement and a sense of well - being about the student's cultural place in the world.
While it is impossible to state that this is widespread in all programs, there are plenty of schools that have turned to
this approach to teaching in undergraduate and graduate programs alike.
Arts Integration is
an APPROACH to TEACHING in which students construct and demonstrate UNDERSTANDING through an ART FORM.
Visible Learning is his suggested
approach to teaching in a way that incorporates many of the significant drivers of achievement...
Philosophy for Children (P4C) is
an approach to teaching in which students participate in group dialogues focused on philosophical issues.
Arts integration is
an approach to teaching in which students construct and demonstrate understanding through an art form.
It's a time to deepen
your approach to teaching in affinity with other Black teachers.
Differentiated instruction is
an approach to teaching in which educators actively plan for students» differences so that all students can best learn.
School Programs uses a thematic - based
approach to teaching in the galleries.
Although the resume has little room in which to expound on your philosophy, a few references to
your approach to teaching in the Resume Profile and Experience sections can convey your level of commitment to, and passion for, your profession.
Not exact matches
Steve Jobs
taught me
to approach business
in a way that isn't focused on money.
In theory, nothing is stopping big companies from taking the same strategy approach as startups do, as I teach in my seminar «Three Ways to Get Back Your Company's Start - upness» at Babson College's Executive Education Cente
In theory, nothing is stopping big companies from taking the same strategy
approach as startups do, as I
teach in my seminar «Three Ways to Get Back Your Company's Start - upness» at Babson College's Executive Education Cente
in my seminar «Three Ways
to Get Back Your Company's Start - upness» at Babson College's Executive Education Center.
The Hunter Hub is the University of Calgary's new initiative
to engage and immerse students, faculty, staff, alumni and the community
in a culture of entrepreneurial thinking, challenging them with a new and bold
approach to teaching, learning, discovery and knowledge - sharing.
I can tell you without doubt, the
teachings in my trading course and my trading strategy and
approach, if applied how I
teach it, will get you
to the finish line a winner.
When brought
in as a motivational sales speaker, Marc
teaches salespeople
to focus on avoiding those objections altogether — by helping the prospect articulate the exact value of solving their key challenges before even
approaching the cost of the solution.
For myself, I find that Jesus
in the Synoptic Gospels
taught direct access
to the Father far more than the intermediary
approach.
@KatMat: your analogy would begin
approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced
to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «
In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belon
In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned
to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted
to have Intelligent Car Driving
taught beside Evolution
in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belon
in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted
to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying
in the realm of sport where it belon
in the realm of sport where it belongs
The variety of
approaches to authority is illustrated
in the way different traditions try
to put an exclamation point on their
teaching.
And the book also offers a deliberately wide array of
approaches to trinitarian issues, including not only historical and systematic theologians, but biblical scholars and analytic philosophers of religion, writing from a variety of theological and communal points of view» Roman Catholic, Protestant, and,
in one case, Jewish (the New Testament scholar Alan Segal, who contributes an instructive if somewhat technical chapter on the role of conflicts between Jews and Christians
in the emergence of early trinitarian
teaching).
While couched
in different language, Catholic social
teaching has much
in common with this
approach,
in its overriding concern
to safeguard the unique dignity of every human person, created
in the image and likeness of God, and
in its emphasis on the duty of civil authority
to foster the common good.
Both
in the secular world and
in the church, our characteristic
approach to human frailty is not chastisement and dire threats, but understanding; not calling people
to repent their sins, but
teaching people the gentle arts of self - acceptance; not an ethic of cross-bearing, but an ethic based on the value of self - actualization.
In Richardson's book there are seven chapters ranging from an examination of Newman's early philosophical stance, the influences that formed him and led him to coherence in the development of his approach to knowledge and commitment, to his teaching on apprehension, assent, inference and the illative sens
In Richardson's book there are seven chapters ranging from an examination of Newman's early philosophical stance, the influences that formed him and led him
to coherence
in the development of his approach to knowledge and commitment, to his teaching on apprehension, assent, inference and the illative sens
in the development of his
approach to knowledge and commitment,
to his
teaching on apprehension, assent, inference and the illative sense.
The second issue that could have beenaddressed is that raised by Patrick FitzPatrick who saw the «deprecation of reason
in order
to make faith more acceptable'a s a difficulty
in Newman's
approach to his
teaching of the illative sense.
Calvary Chapels place great importance
in the practice of expository
teaching, a «verse by verse, chapter by chapter, book by book»
approach to teaching the Bible.
To me, Wright's
approach makes the most sense of 2 Timothy 3:16: «All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for
teaching, rebuking, correcting and training
in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.»
Finally, if we are
to take seriously an organic
approach to narrative
teaching, we will tell stories from different eras of history and different parts of the world, but we will also tell stories that are happening
in our midst.
For they have
taught that some receive it sacramentally only,
to wit sinners: others spiritually only, those
to wit who eating
in desire that heavenly bread which is set before them, are, by a lively faith which worketh by charity, made sensible of the fruit and usefulness thereof: whereas the third (class) receive it both sacramentally and spiritually, and these are they who so prove and prepare themselves beforehand, as
to approach to this divine table clothed with the wedding garment.
Instead of using the Church's own
teaching and
approach, summed up
in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, the CES imagines that it is better
to use the ideology which has dominated Catholic education
in England and Wales for too long and with woeful results.
What I am calling for here is for the Birmingham programme
to present that
approach in a more systematic way which will show
to best advantage the compellingnature of the Church's moral
teaching as true.
An
approach that enthusiastically accepts Church
teaching in this area will also find it much easier
to manage the related relationship between school and parents.
It is an
approach G K Chesterton identified and criticised
in his essay «The New Case for Catholic Schools», published
in 1950 as part of a collection entitled The Common Man: «If Catholics are
to teach Catholicism all the time, they can not merely
teach Catholic theology for part of the time.
He points out
in various places that while Jesus was using a typical Rabbinic Jewish
approach to teaching, His
approach was creatively unique.
This subsection itself bears comparison with Chapter II of Science and the Modern World; again it is entirely congenial
to Whitehead's
approach, if indeed it is not his own statement of it, that is reflected
in the openings of subsections» (a) Nature of number,»» (b) Fundamental concepts of geometry,» and» (c) Nature of applied mathematics The theme of starting with clear principles
in mathematics has run throughout Whitehead's earlier work, particularly his lectures on the
teaching of mathematics and his textbook.
An incarnational
approach to education might just require us
to set aside some of our «professorial prerogatives» and «professional prestige» (i.e., academic arrogance)
in order really
to teach — as well as
to learn.
In some ways it's more a liturgical matter than a theological one — by modeling a predominantly narratival / typological rather than ahistorical / doctrinal
approach to life, I've been able
to pack a lot of
teaching into relatively few moments.
God is
teaching us
to approach life
in the illegible city without feeling the need for a Big Key.
question by Sinsinawa Dominican Sister Erica Jordan, who not - so - subtly suggested that Ryan's
approach to healthcare reform, tax reform, and welfare reform was
in conflict with the Church's social
teaching, the very Catholic Speaker replied that he completely agreed with Sister Erica that God is «always on the side of the poor and dispossessed»; the real question was, how do public officials, who are not God, create public policies that empower the poor and dispossessed
to be not - poor and not - dispossessed?
So
in the final chapter, Lanzetta questions post-Conciliar
approaches to ecumenism where the «dogmatic» (
to do with knowing the truth) is juxtaposed
to the «pastoral» «which starts out from the historic and pragmatic fact, and on behalf of this aims at possible dialogue, without changing
teaching, but de facto neither improving understanding of it, but even with the risk of altering its significance by virtue of the dialogue method chosen...».
While it is fine, indeed healthy, for Judaic scholars
to engage
in a heated exchange about the best way
to approach interfaith dialogue, nothing can justify Prof. Novak's truly repugnant accusation that,
in not ascribing
to Dabru Emet, Prof. Levenson is somehow guilty of fostering «self - hatred» among Christians, or his insulting suggestion that Levenson would be better off
teaching in an Orthodox yeshiva than at Harvard.
It is not shrouded
in the «layman can't understand» mystery that seems
to come with the fragmented «blind men describing an elephant»
teaching approach.
Certainly, every single parable
in the tradition has
to be
approached with the basic assumption that, as it now stands, it represents the
teaching of the early Church: that the voice is the voice of the risen Lord
to the evangelist, and of the evangelist
to the Church, not that of the historical Jesus
to a group gathered by the sea of Galilee.
One can point
to the emergence of a variety of critical
approaches to religion
in general, and
to Christianity
in particular, which have contributed
to the breakdown of certainties: These include historical - critical and other new methods for the study of biblical texts, feminist criticism of Christian history and theology, Marxist analysis of the function of religious communities, black studies pointing
to long - obscured realities, sociological and anthropological research
in regard
to cross-cultural religious life, and examinations of traditional
teachings by non-Western scholars.
What if Paul VI had adopted the Cracovian
approach to presenting the truths he
taught in Humanae Vitae?
This,
in fact, is the truly pastoral
approach as
taught by Pope John Paul II: «
To acknowledge one's sins... to recognise one as being a sinner, capable of sin and inclined to commit sin, is the essential first step in returning to God» (Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et Penitentia, (1984), n. 13
To acknowledge one's sins...
to recognise one as being a sinner, capable of sin and inclined to commit sin, is the essential first step in returning to God» (Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et Penitentia, (1984), n. 13
to recognise one as being a sinner, capable of sin and inclined
to commit sin, is the essential first step in returning to God» (Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et Penitentia, (1984), n. 13
to commit sin, is the essential first step
in returning
to God» (Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et Penitentia, (1984), n. 13
to God» (Pope John Paul II, Reconciliatio et Penitentia, (1984), n. 13).
One way of
approaching this is
to ask all the teachers
in the church school
to attend two open meetings of AA as a part of their preparation for
teaching in the general area of alcohol and alcoholism.
The emphasis of this book is that we should call Jesus «Rabbi» or «Teacher» and
approach Him
in prayer and Bible reading looking for Him
to teach us.
Nevertheless, logically and practically, I do think that the best way
to approach Scripture is book - by - book, verse - by - verse, both
in our reading and
in our
teaching.
I will be writing more about this
in future posts as a good way for churches
to transition from lots of
teaching,
to a more balanced «
teach and serve»
approach.
To me, for example, one of the most exciting recent developments in Spinoza scholarship is Carlos Fraenkel's argument that Spinoza could have adopted a more conciliatory approach to biblical interpretation, one that would reinterpret the Bible in accordance with his teachings, thus mitigating their heretical ton
To me, for example, one of the most exciting recent developments
in Spinoza scholarship is Carlos Fraenkel's argument that Spinoza could have adopted a more conciliatory
approach to biblical interpretation, one that would reinterpret the Bible in accordance with his teachings, thus mitigating their heretical ton
to biblical interpretation, one that would reinterpret the Bible
in accordance with his
teachings, thus mitigating their heretical tone.
It's no secret that I've expressed concerns over Driscoll's
teachings and antics
in the past, particularly those that encourage the bullying of men who don't fit into Driscoll's macho - man mold, but I tried
to approach this book with an open
in mind, and indeed I found some pleasant surprises
in Real Marriage.