We've had some really great legal debates about whether a read receipt generated by an e-mail sent to a lawyer actually gives rise to
an appropriate claim of privilege.
Not exact matches
It is natural and
appropriate to be scandalized that such
claims should be made
of just these all - too - well - known groups, faithless to their self - descriptions, thoroughly assimilated to the value system
of the larger culture in which they live, complacent and at ease, often trivial and banal, subtly using the rhetoric
of the faith to sanction their
privileges and to obscure society's injustices.
In a speech in November 2015, Jamie Symington, Director
of Enforcement at the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said: «We fully understand and respect the needs and rights
of firms to
claim and protect their rights to legal
privilege where
appropriate.
The Court divided, however, both on the question
of the
appropriate standard
of review
of the Privacy Commissioner's decision and on the question
of whether s 56 (3)
of FOIPP did in fact permit the Privacy Commissioner to review documents to assess the legitimacy
of a public body's
claim of solicitor - client
privilege.
The legislature intended to allow the Commissioner to assess
claims of solicitor - client
privilege in
appropriate cases; that intention can be identified from the «grammatical and ordinary meaning
of the words «any
privilege of the law
of evidence»» and from contextual factors (at para 79).