Staying the proceedings is
an appropriate exercise of discretion in instances in which the Crown prosecutor determines that there is a reasonable likelihood of recommencing the proceedings but it has become necessary, for example, for the police to conduct further investigation that was previously unforeseen.
Not exact matches
We stand by those statements and are confident both matters were resolved in an
appropriate, lawful
exercise of the District Attorney's prosecutorial
discretion...»
Working with law enforcement and the animal welfare community to help distinguish between these situations, and supporting law enforcement's
exercise of discretion to treat cases as criminal when
appropriate and to refer other cases for intervention that will provide support to pet owners, is a linchpin
of our efforts.1
It may be
appropriate for the court to consider appointing a specialist other than the proposed examiner but only where the plaintiff demonstrates, on a preponderance
of evidence, sufficient grounds to justify the court in concluding that its
discretion should not be
exercised in favour
of the appointment
of the defendant's nominee...
Although not a basis
of the Tribunal's ultimate decision, it should be noted that a distinction was drawn in this case between a partner in name alone and one
exercising appropriate discretion and control over the partnership.
In light
of the defendant's failure and unwillingness to comply with the order made by Stinson J., its late disclosure
of important documents, counsel's uncivil conduct leading up to and at the trial, and the repeated failures
of the defendant's counsel to comply with the directions and orders
of the court, it is
appropriate for the court to
exercise its
discretion to deny the successful defendant its costs.
In order to obtain permission, the claimant will have to show (in relation to each cause
of action which forms part
of the claim) that: (1) there is a serious issue to be tried in relation to the foreign defendant (i.e. the claim must have a real prospect
of success); (2) there is a good arguable case that the claim falls within one or more
of the «jurisdictional gateways» set out in the Civil Procedure Rules; and (3) England is clearly the
appropriate forum for the case and the Court ought to
exercise its
discretion to permit service
of the proceedings out
of the jurisdiction.
In making the appointment, the appointing authority shall use the following list - procedure, unless the parties agree that the list - procedure should not be used or unless the appointing authority determines in its
discretion that the use
of the list - procedure is not
appropriate for the case: (a) The appointing authority shall communicate to each
of the parties an identical list containing at least three names; (b) Within 15 days after the receipt
of this list, or such other period as may be set by the Secretariat, each party may return the list to the appointing authority, without copying the other party, after having deleted the name or names to which it objects and numbered the remaining names on the list in the order
of its preference; (c) After the expiration
of the above period
of time the appointing authority shall appoint the sole arbitrator from among the names approved on the lists returned to it and in accordance with the order
of preference indicated by the parties; (d) If for any reason the appointment can not be made according to this procedure, the appointing authority may
exercise its
discretion in appointing the sole arbitrator.
According to the ABCA, based on established case law (RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 441 (CanLII)-RRB-, the
exercise of a court's
discretion to consider the wishes
of a child is dependent on two pre-conditions: i) that the child objects; and ii) that the child has attained an age and degree
of maturity at which it is
appropriate to take account
of the child's views.
In Raggett v (1) Society
of Jesus Trust 1929 for Roman Catholic Purposes (2) Preston Catholic College Governors [2010] EWCA Civ 1002, [2010] All ER (D) 116 (Aug) it was held that in a sexual abuse claim where the abuse was historic, the order in which the judge approached issues
of liability and limitation did not affect the substance
of an overall assessment as to whether it was
appropriate to
exercise judicial
discretion under the Limitation Act 1980, s 33 to disapply the limitation period.
[37] Thus, averaging over a five year period may be an
appropriate exercise of the court's
discretion under s. 19 where it would more accurately reflect the income available to a payor spouse than a three year average would.
The
appropriate exercise of prosecutorial
discretion is fundamental to the proper functioning
of the bail process.
Next a court should consider whether it is
appropriate to
exercise discretion in favour
of setting aside the agreement or a provision within it.
(3) The Court or a Judge must
exercise the
discretion under section 47B
of the Federal Court
of Australia Act 1976 to allow a person to appear before the Court or Judge, or make a submission to the Court or Judge, by way
of video link, audio link or other
appropriate means if the Court or the Judge is satisfied that:
If the measures were targeted solely to parents or families in need
of assistance to prevent neglect or abuse
of children, as they are in s123UC
of the legislation, then some form
of income management may be capable
of being seen as an
appropriate exercise of the governments «margin
of discretion'to ensure that families benefit from welfare and receive the minimum essentials for survival.