Federal courts have played a key
role in the development of special
education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law means by a «free appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summ
education policy by interpreting what Congress wrote
in IDEA three decades ago, and the Supreme Court is reviewing what the law means by a «free
appropriate public education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special Education» legal beat, Summ
education» as it considers Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, which deals with the standard of services districts are required to provide (see «Examining the Standards for Special
Education» legal beat, Summ
Education» legal beat, Summer 2017).
«Only though a clearly defined and
appropriate federal role, a willingness to explore a revised charge of the U.S. Department of
Education, and placing primary responsibility for education in the hands of locally elected school boards who clearly have the greatest confidence of the public, will school reform efforts thrive at local level
Education, and placing primary responsibility for
education in the hands of locally elected school boards who clearly have the greatest confidence of the public, will school reform efforts thrive at local level
education in the hands of locally elected school boards who clearly have the greatest confidence of the
public, will school reform efforts thrive at local levels.»