Currently 28 states have passed measures (number changes as some states add, other rescind) calling for /
approving of a Constitutional Convention (aka «Article V Convention», after the portion of the Constitution that covers that).
Not exact matches
Going through the more formal, restricted process
of proposing a specific Amendment that must be introduced in Congress, be passed by 2/3 majorities in both houses, and then be ratified by the required number
of states (3/4, which would still have to
approve amendments from a
convention, as well) seems doomed to fail in this current period of hyper - partisanship and gridlock, but the alternative of calling a Constitutional Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had
convention, as well) seems doomed to fail in this current period
of hyper - partisanship and gridlock, but the alternative
of calling a
Constitutional Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had
Convention is so broad that it can easily have unexpected results, in the opposite direction that those originally organizing had hoped for.
Without a
convention, any
constitutional reform must be
approved by two separate sessions
of the State Legislature and a public referendum.
Opponents
of a
constitutional convention say that they fear radical ideas could be
approved and that political insiders and special interests could control the
convention.
Of the three propositions on the New York state ballot Tuesday, voters rejected the question asking for a
constitutional convention but
approved public pension forfeiture and a Forest Preserve land bank.
If voters
approve having a
Constitutional Convention, three delegates from each
of the 63 senate districts and fifteen at - large delegates nominated by political parties would be elected in November 2018.
(Amended by
Constitutional Convention of 1938 and
approved by vote
of the people November 8, 1938; further amended by vote
of the people November 7, 1961.)
«While acknowledging the potential negatives
of such a
convention — e.g., the risk
of amendments being
approved that would weaken the home rule authority
of local governments — the Executive Committee viewed the opportunity to strengthen the position
of municipalities in New York's governmental structure as more important and voted to
approve NYCOM's support
of a «Yes» vote on the
constitutional convention question facing New York voters this November, with the additional stipulation that municipal officials would need to run for and be elected as delegates to the
convention if our intended outcomes are to be achieved,» the guide states
While Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo and much
of the Albany establishment opposed the measure, many good - government types said a
constitutional convention would be the best way to break down institutional corruption in Albany by forcing changes in campaign finance and ethics laws that state legislature would never
approve.