Sentences with phrase «arbitral decisions under»

This sort of approach, with its openness to reasoning by incorporation, makes it very tough to challenge arbitral decisions under Newfoundland Nurses.
In Taylor v. Exalta Transport Services Ltd. [xii], Adjudicator Williams - Whitt adopted the modern approach from a previous arbitral decision under the Canada Labour Code.

Not exact matches

In reaching this decision, the High Court undertook a review of past Singapore case law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its awards against judicial scrutiny by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
Arbitral tribunal decisions are widely enforceable internationally (including in China and the United States) under a number of conventions, including the New York Convention, of which the UK is a direct contracting party.
During the arbitration procedure and until the arbitral decision, neither entity shall act in a manner that may affect the rights of the other Party under these HoA / Service Agreement.
Under the New York Convention, arbitral awards enjoy the same protection as domestic court decisions and deference is given to agreements to arbitrate.
While we will be featuring posts over the coming days on this award that dissect and analyze the award, its international legal significance, and its larger geopolitical consequences for all claimants to the South China Sea dispute and third - party actors (such as the United States), for now, a close read of all 479 pages of this arbitral award reveals it to be an extremely rich and fertile piece of international jurisprudence, one that will certainly have far - ranging doctrinal impacts as an international judicial decision that is also an authoritative subsidiary means for determination of the international law rules under UNCLOS, especially on questions such as the: 1) normative weight of «historic rights» and differentiating the same from «historic title» and «historic rights short of sovereignty», and clarifying what could still possibly amount to historic rights that States could still validly assert within the UNCLOS treaty regime;
Whether the arbitration in question is governed by the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the ICSID Convention, the Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, the Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce — you name it — the Mauritius Convention would provide for transparency of submissions to arbitral tribunals, arbitration hearings, and decisions by arbitral tribunals, and give more room for third - party participation under a uniform set of rules.
Both appeals involve arbitral decisions concerning the interpretation of «insured person» under s. 3 (1) of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule — Effective September 1, 2010, O. Reg.
These two appeals were heard together because they give rise to the same main issues: the standard of review applicable to insurance arbitral decisions resolving priority disputes arising from the statutory accident benefits regime under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8, and statutory and contractual interpretation issues affecting the priority question.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z