Sentences with phrase «arbitral tribunal hearing»

Chair of a three - member arbitral tribunal hearing a dispute governed by the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules arising from a contract between parties in the United Arab Emirates and New York.

Chair of a three - member arbitral tribunal hearing a dispute governed by the ICDR Procedures arising from a contract in the biomedical industry between parties in Sweden and the United States.

Not exact matches

For example, the Paris Court of Appeal rejected a challenge to enforcement in which a party argued that the arbitral tribunal had disregarded the «submission to arbitration» by refusing to hold a third hearing following the submission of an expert report.

The standard included in the MFN - clause — «fair and equitable treatment» — was not considered to amount to an unconditional right for investors to have their case heard by an international arbitral tribunal.

This case follows on from the recent judgment in Sanum Investments Ltd v Government of the Lao People's Democratic Republic [2016] SGCA 57, in which the Singapore Court of Appeal found that an investor - State arbitral tribunal did have jurisdiction to hear claims against the Government of Laos.

A further possibility would be some form of ad hoc arbitral tribunal to hear disputes as and when they arise.

60 days from closure of the hearing or lastsubmission provided that parties, at request of arbitral tribunal, can extend this period in writing and signed by the parties

Case management, which is standard practice and conducted by the arbitral tribunal that will eventually hear the merits of the case, leads to much efficiency and less gamesmanship by lawyers.

Witnesses, including expert witnesses, may be heard under the conditions and examined in the manner set by the arbitral tribunal.

In the event of an oral hearing, the arbitral tribunal shall give the parties adequate advance notice of the date, time and place thereof.

If a party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of the report, participate in a hearing where the parties have the opportunity to put questions to him or her and to present expert witnesses in order to testify on the points at issue.

If a party, duly notified under these Rules, fails to appear at a hearing, without showing sufficient cause for such failure, the arbitral tribunal may proceed with the arbitration.

General provisions (Article 17) Place of arbitration (Article 18) Language (Article 19) Statement of claim (Article 20) Statement of defence (Article 21) Amendments to the claim or defence (Article 22) Pleas as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal (Article 23) Further written statements (Article 24) Periods of time (Article 25) Interim measures (Article 26) Evidence (Article 27) Hearings (Article 28) Experts appointed by the arbitral tribunal (Article 29) Default (Article 30) Closure of proceedings (Article 31) Waiver of right to object (Article 32)

Counsel for Stans Energy Corporation before the High Court of England and Wales defending a challenge brought by the Kyrgyz Republic to the jurisdiction of an arbitral tribunal seated in London and hearing claims under the Kyrgyz Foreign Investment Law.

The arbitral tribunal may, at the request of any party, allow one or more third persons to be joined in the arbitration as a party provided such person is a party to the arbitration agreement, unless the arbitral tribunal finds, after giving all parties, including the person or persons to be joined, the opportunity to be heard, that joinder should not be permitted because of prejudice to any of those parties.

Whether the arbitration in question is governed by the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, the ICSID Convention, the Arbitration Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce, the Arbitration Rules of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce — you name it — the Mauritius Convention would provide for transparency of submissions to arbitral tribunals, arbitration hearings, and decisions by arbitral tribunals, and give more room for third - party participation under a uniform set of rules.

Disputes relating to BITs are heard in arbitral tribunals administered by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), an arm of The World Bank, or similar arbitration centers.

(3) A party who has an objection to the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to conduct the arbitration shall make the objection no later than the beginning of the hearing or, if there is no hearing, no later than the first occasion on which the party submits a statement to the tribunal.

26 (1) The arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration on the basis of documents or may hold hearings for the presentation of evidence and for oral argument; however, the tribunal shall hold a hearing if a party requests it.

Therefore, it can be argued that arbitral tribunals do not necessarily have to be bound by the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court when hearing cases.

The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) has announced (see press release here) that its President has appointed three arbitrators to serve as members of the arbitral tribunal which will hear the dispute between Mauritius and the United Kingdom concerning the «Marine Protected Area» around the Chagos Islands.

If it is likely that the opposite party will abide by the order and the parties simply need a preliminary ruling on a matter, and if a faster hearing can be obtained before the arbitral tribunal than before a court, then the motion likely should be brought to the arbitral tribunal.

It may be more convenient for an arbitral tribunal sitting in one country to conduct a hearing in another country - for instance, for the purpose of taking evidence....

By another order dated 30.10.2003, the arbitral tribunal directed that the hearing of the application filed by the claimants for taking on record the supplementary claim will take place at London on 15.11.2003, on which date, the following order was passed in Arbitration Case No. 3 of 2003:

The arbitral tribunal fixed 28.3.2003 as the date of hearing at Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia), but due to outbreak of epidemic SARS, the arbitral tribunal shifted the venue of its sittings to Amsterdam in the first instance and, thereafter, to London.