The changes were not substantive in nature, and they related solely to post
arbitration award procedures.
Not exact matches
The parties agree that any and all controversies, disputes or claims arising out of or under this Agreement, shall be exclusively governed and decided by binding
arbitration under the Federal
Arbitration Act in conformity with the Rules and
Procedures as established by the American
Arbitration Association, and the determination of the arbitrator shall be final and binding (except to the extent there exist grounds for vacation of an
award under applicable
arbitration statutes).
It is well known globally for its world - class and
award - winning
arbitration group, and also specialises in Banking and Project Finance, Mergers and Acquisitions, Capital Market
Procedures and Transactions, Oil & Gas, IT, Anti-Trust and Litigation.
Courts have rejected challenges under article V (1)(d) where the parties choose institutional rules to govern their
procedure that provide for flexibility concerning the manner in which the tribunal is to be composed.881 On the other hand, a German court refused recognition and enforcement where an
award was rendered by two, instead of three arbitrators, as expressly required by the rules of the International
Arbitration Court of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce that the parties had agreed would govern their
arbitration.882
Accordingly, the
procedure for enforcing or setting aside an international
arbitration award made in Myanmar is uncertain.
We advise on all aspects of
arbitration, from drafting suitable clauses to advising on the type and seat of
arbitration, the formation of a tribunal, arbitral
procedure and enforcement of the
award.
The section features information on the enforcement
procedures in various CIS states, a database of court judgements on the enforcements of SCC arbitral
awards, e-books about
arbitration in Sweden and samples of documents filed in
arbitrations under the SCC Rules.
Each province has its own domestic
arbitration legislation that sets out rules and
procedures for the recognition and enforcement of arbitral
awards.
The advocate - general proceeded to state that his conclusion that anti-suit injunctions in support of
arbitration are permitted by the Brussels I (recast) is supported by the fourth paragraph of recital 12, which states that the Regulation should not apply to an action or ancillary proceedings relating to, in particular, the conduct of an
arbitration procedure or any other aspects of such a
procedures not to the recognition or enforcement of
awards.
Finally, para 4 of recital 12 states that the Regulation should not apply to any action or ancillary proceedings relating to (in particular) the establishment of an arbitral tribunal, the powers of arbitrators, the conduct of an
arbitration procedure or any other aspects of such a
procedure, nor to any action or judgment concerning the annulment, review, appeal, recognition or enforcement of an arbitral
award.
In light of the New York Convention Article III prohibition on applying more onerous
procedure to the enforcement of international
arbitration awards than to that of domestic
awards, this discrepancy is problematic.
Moreover, under Article 238 of the UAE Law of Civil
Procedures, the terms of treaties between UAE and foreign countries and international conventions ratified by the UAE are applicable in law in connection with the enforcement and recognition of foreign
arbitration awards.
Equally under Article 238 of the Law of Civil
Procedures, the terms of treaties between UAE and foreign countries and international conventions ratified by the UAE are applicable in law in connection with the enforcement and recognition of foreign
arbitration awards in the UAE.
Among other things, they extend the judicial reporting system in
arbitration - related judicial review
procedures to arbitral agreements without foreign elements and domestic arbitral
awards.
Even though Alphamix concerned a domestic arbitral
award, the attitude of the Judge in scrutinizing the arguments against the enforcement of an
award when a litigant has gone through all the proper court
procedures, even public interest ones, is most welcome and sends a strong signal to public bodies which choose to have their commercial disputes resolved by way of
arbitration, that they should take
arbitration proceedings and arbitral
awards made against them seriously.
Investor - State
Arbitration examines the international treaties that give investors a right to
arbitration of claims, the most - commonly employed
arbitration rules, and the most important elements of investor - state
arbitration procedure including tribunal composition, jurisdiction, evidence,
award, and challenge of annulment.
South Carolina's Uniform
Arbitration Act, Title 15, Chapter 48, sets forth
procedures to challenge or obtain court approval of an
arbitration award.
The arbitral
award is to be rendered according to the
procedures agreed to between the parties and the provisions of the
arbitration law.
We see no merit in the appellant's argument that the reference to the 1970 Act addressed substantive rights to appeal an arbitrator's
award, while «any successor Act» would only apply to the
arbitration procedure.
CPLR 7501 et seq. similarly sets forth the standards for judicial review of
arbitration awards for
arbitrations governed by New York State
procedures, and similarly limits the court's authority to vacatur of the
Award — not a sanction against the attorney, much less an award of treble dam
Award — not a sanction against the attorney, much less an
award of treble dam
award of treble damages.
For those not familiar with the intricacies of China's judicial review of
arbitration issues, a 1995 SPC circular sets out a prior approval
procedure, requiring local court rulings to refuse to enforce foreign - related /» greater China» / foreign
arbitration awards to be submitted for eventual review by the SPC.. It is currently an internal administrative type
procedure, with no explicit option of a hearing.
It is suggested that, at the appropriate point in the text of the Generic Rules, a
procedure will need to be added that accommodates binding pre-dispute
arbitration agreements without imposing
awards arising out of such agreements on buyers who would not be permitted to enter into such agreements under applicable law from which the parties can not derogate.
The numerous benefits of
arbitration range from the flexible nature of arbitral
procedure, over which the parties have quasi-absolute control, to the ease of enforceability of
arbitration awards and the fact that IP - related issues can be resolved in a single set of proceedings rather than having to be litigated in every jurisdiction in which the IP right is allegedly infringed.
(iii) the
procedure to be followed when
arbitration ends, both where it has resulted in an agreement or
award and where it has not; and
Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or any breach thereof, must be resolved by confidential binding
arbitration in Nashville, Tennessee in accordance with the Supplementary
Procedures for Consumer - Related Disputes of the American
Arbitration Association (http://www.adr.org/sp.asp?id=22014), and judgment upon the
award rendered by the arbitrator may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof.
Nonmembers arbitrating pursuant to an agreement to participate in a REALTOR ® association owned and operated MLS shall be subject to all obligations under an association's
arbitration procedures, including, but not limited to, the obligation to pay an
award promptly or deposit a like amount in the event of a challenge pursuant to Section 53, The Award, Code of Ethics and Arbitration Ma
award promptly or deposit a like amount in the event of a challenge pursuant to Section 53, The
Award, Code of Ethics and Arbitration Ma
Award, Code of Ethics and
Arbitration Manual.
NOTE: Escrowing of
arbitration awards to secure timely payment as addressed in Section 53 (b - c) is not required in states where escrowing
awards by associations is prohibitively expensive, and where the state association recommends alternative aggressive and cost - effective enforcement
procedures that maximize enforcement / payment under state law, and local associations adopt those
procedures, provided that nothing in those
procedures is prohibited by National Association policy.
Procedural note: The sole issue for the Procedural Review Hearing Tribunal to decide is whether the
arbitration procedures utilized in rendering the
Award of Arbitrators afforded all parties due process.
Another change requires associations, if they don't escrow funds because of the cost, to adopt their state's «aggressive and cost - effective»
procedures for enforcing
arbitration awards.
Conformity with state law The
procedures by which
arbitration requests are received, hearings are conducted, and
awards are made must be in strict conformity with the law.