Sentences with phrase «arbitration hearing involving»

Led by Paul Key QC of Essex Court Chambers, represented sellers in a two - week Fosfa arbitration hearing involving the long - term supply of edible oil to buyers in a Southern African state; the hearing involved issues relating to the interpretation of time - bars, the extension of shipment periods and waiver and estoppel.

This moot, which simulates NHL salary arbitration hearings involving real players» processes, was held Nov. 7 last year.

Not exact matches

After a protracted arbitration process and final hearing — which involved two separate state court appeals — the Arbitrator, a former Chief Justice of the Florida Supreme Court, ruled in favor of the health system respondents on liability, and awarded no damages to the physician - limited partner on any of his arbitration claims.

In Preston v. Ferrer (which involved TV celebrity judge Alex Ferrer), the Court, in an 8 - 1 ruling, found that the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) compelled arbitration of Ferrer's contract with his talent agent, and preempted a California law that required an administrative hearing prior to arbitration.

Future Lawyer links to this story that reports how lawyers involved in an arbitration transmitted the hearings from the hearing room to a consultant at a nearby hotel room.

Currently, around 20 % of the international arbitration cases heard at SIAC involve at least one Indian party but India is hoping to have these cases heard at the MCIA in the future.

If you are a litigator, you'll receive notices of hearings, motions, mediation briefs, arbitrations, settlement conference statements, trial briefs, and a host of different forms of correspondence from everyone involved in the matter.

The arbitration involved two main hearings in Lagos two years apart, the second of which heard evidence from 11 witnesses and experts and involved closing submissions that ran to nearly 800 pages.

We've been involved in professional disciplinary hearings, labour arbitration, environmental proceedings, and municipal assessments.

When choosing the seat, careful consideration should be given to the ability and inclination of the courts of the seat to become involved in the arbitration, including setting aside any award, and whether one can expect a fair hearing before those courts.

Erik has tried over 70 jury trials, and has been involved in arbitration and substantive evidentiary hearings matters, such as:

-- Instructed by Addleshaw Goddard LLP (as junior to Vernon Flynn QC) in a substantial expedited ICC arbitration involving a claim for breach of contract culminating, part way through the hearing, in a $ 225 million settlement deal.

This case involved a preliminary issue hearing to determine whether the claimant could proceed to arbitration when she refused to attend for an assessment of her attendant care needs.

Representative matters have included the removal of an international health insurance dispute from state to federal court and enforcement of an international arbitration agreement and jurisdictional matters involving the ability of a federal court to hear an action to set aside an arbitration award issued in an arbitration involving two foreign parties.

SIAC arbitration involving the cancellation of a contract for the import of a cargo of coal into India (involving governmental restrictions on the use of imported coal in India in favour of the use of domestic coal), culminating in a 5 - day hearing in Singapore.

LMAA arbitration (led by Steven Gee QC for hearing only) listed for a 10 day hearing arising out of carriage of a cargo of petroleum products and involving expert evidence in multiple fields, settled on fourth day of trial.

If it appears that there may be related claims involving other parties arising out of the same facts, the Grievance Committee may suggest to either the complainant or respondent (or both) that they may wish to request arbitration with additional respondents or third - party respondents so that all related claims may be resolved through a single arbitration hearing.

Anyone who was a party to the original arbitration hearing, a member of the Grievance Committee present during the meeting when the arbitration request was reviewed, a member of the original arbitration Hearing Panel, or who was otherwise involved in this matter prior to the procedural review request is disqualified from serving on this Procedural Review Hearing Trhearing, a member of the Grievance Committee present during the meeting when the arbitration request was reviewed, a member of the original arbitration Hearing Panel, or who was otherwise involved in this matter prior to the procedural review request is disqualified from serving on this Procedural Review Hearing TrHearing Panel, or who was otherwise involved in this matter prior to the procedural review request is disqualified from serving on this Procedural Review Hearing TrHearing Tribunal.

While arbitration awards may, at times, involve significant sums of money, they differ from the decisions rendered by ethics hearing panels in two significant ways.

Also useful for members of the grievance committee, hearing panels and board of directors (or any real estate firm involved with an ethics complaint and / or arbitration request.)

i. «Hearing» may refer either to an ethics hearing relating to disciplinary matters or to an arbitration hearing in which the dispute generally involves entitlement to a commission or to compenHearing» may refer either to an ethics hearing relating to disciplinary matters or to an arbitration hearing in which the dispute generally involves entitlement to a commission or to compenhearing relating to disciplinary matters or to an arbitration hearing in which the dispute generally involves entitlement to a commission or to compenhearing in which the dispute generally involves entitlement to a commission or to compensation.

Panel members are advised to consider the following, which are representative of the issues and questions frequently involved in arbitration hearings.

Among the reasons for this are the fact that arbitration awards are not appealable on the merits but generally only on the limited procedural bases established in the governing state arbitration statute; that the issues considered by Hearing Panels are often myriad and complex, and the reasoning for an award may be equally complex and difficult to reduce to writing; and that the inclusion of written findings of fact or rationale (or both) would conceivably result in attempts to use such detail as «precedent» in subsequent hearings which might or might not involve similar facts.