Sentences with phrase «arbitration law relating»

Not exact matches

You agree that regardless of any statute or law which establishes a different statute of limitations, to the maximum extent permitted under applicable law, any claim or cause of action (including any arbitration) arising out of, related to or connected with the use of the Site or other online services, or these Terms of Service, our Privacy Policy, or other NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships must be filed within one (1) year after such claim or cause of action arose or be forever barred.

The Philippines brought an arbitration case in 2013 over the South China Sea, eventually lodging 15 claims against China related to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea — a critical piece of international law that both countries have ratifiLaw of the Sea — a critical piece of international law that both countries have ratifilaw that both countries have ratified.

In the event that we are not able to resolve a dispute, we each agree that any and all disputes, controversies, or claims arising under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual claims in small claims court, if your claims qualify).

These documents will detail the scope of work and contractual information required by the Band as it relates to arbitration, governing law, and sovereign community.

26.1 Regardless of any statute of limitations or law to the contrary, and to maximum extent permitted by applicable law, any Dispute arising out of or related to the Services or this Agreement must be filed within six (6) months after the date in which the incident giving rise to the Dispute occurred; provided that, if the substantive law applicable to the arbitration prohibits the parties from agreeing to this limitations period, then the limitations period under the applicable substantive law shall control.

You and Velocity Micro agree that any claim, dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

In the event of any controversy, claim or dispute between the parties arising out of or relating to this agreement or the breach, termination, enforcement, interpretation, consionability or validity thereof, including any determination of the scope or applicability of this agreement to arbitrate, shall be determined by arbitration in Laramie County, Wyoming or in the county in which the consumer resides, in accordance with the Laws of the State of Wyoming for agreements to be made in and to be performed in Wyoming.

Unless a different procedure is required by applicable law, the arbitration will be conducted before a single arbitrator in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association («AAA»), including the AAA's Supplementary Procedures for Consumer - Related Disputes.

Except as expressly provided herein, any claim, dispute or controversy (whether based upon contract; tort, intentional or otherwise; constitution; statute; common law; or equity and whether pre-existing, present or future), including initial claims, counter-claims, cross-claims and thirdparty claims, arising from or relating to (i) the Card; (ii) any service relating to the Card; (iii) the marketing of the Card; (iv) this Cardholder Agreement, including the validity, enforceability, interpretation, scope, or application of the Agreement and this arbitration provision (except for the prohibition on class or other non-individual claims, which shall be for a court to decide); and (v) any other agreement or instrument relating to the Card or any such service («Claim») shall be decided, upon the election of you or the Bank (or Green Dot Corporation or the Bank's agents, employees, successors, representatives, affiliated companies, or assigns), by binding arbitration pursuant to this arbitration provision and the applicable rules and procedures of the arbitration administrator in effect at the time the Claim is filed.

For any action at law or in equity relating to the arbitration provision of these Terms of Use, you agree to resolve any dispute you have with Blue Buffalo exclusively in a state or federal court located in Connecticut, and to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the courts located in Connecticut for the purpose of litigating all such disputes.

Binding Arbitration: ANY CLAIM, DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code of Procedure then in effeLAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code of Procedure then in effelaw, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA) under its Code of Procedure then in effect.

If one takes the perspective of counsel representing an investor in an imagined intra-EU arbitration not (directly) related to EU law, one plausible argument is that since the arbitration stems from a purely domestic measure, the autonomy concerns of the Court are entirely immaterial to the dispute at hand.

' The disputing parties can invoke EU law related arguments in intra-EU arbitrations if this is considered a good litigation strategy and if the facts and legal materials facilitate their use, and this holds true irrespective of the wording of the arbitration clause or the content of the arbitration rules that govern the dispute.

Between Electrabel and Maffezini, there are many other ways in which EU law can relate to intra-EU arbitrations.

Students may have the opportunity to work as graduate research assistants or volunteers on arbitration - related projects and initiatives with organizations such as Miami Law's International Arbitration Institute (IAI) or individual Miami Law faculty specializing in international and foreign law, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Law Section of the Florida Bar, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the Young Practitioners» and Students» Group of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (Young ICCA), the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS), and Future of Arbitration: Miami (FA: M), South Florida's first young arbitration practitioners» group, co-founded by Marike Paulsson in 20Law's International Arbitration Institute (IAI) or individual Miami Law faculty specializing in international and foreign law, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Law Section of the Florida Bar, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the Young Practitioners» and Students» Group of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (Young ICCA), the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS), and Future of Arbitration: Miami (FA: M), South Florida's first young arbitration practitioners» group, co-founded by Marike Paulsson in 20Law faculty specializing in international and foreign law, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Law Section of the Florida Bar, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the Young Practitioners» and Students» Group of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (Young ICCA), the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS), and Future of Arbitration: Miami (FA: M), South Florida's first young arbitration practitioners» group, co-founded by Marike Paulsson in 20law, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Law Section of the Florida Bar, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the Young Practitioners» and Students» Group of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (Young ICCA), the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS), and Future of Arbitration: Miami (FA: M), South Florida's first young arbitration practitioners» group, co-founded by Marike Paulsson in 20Law Section of the Florida Bar, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), the Young Practitioners» and Students» Group of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (Young ICCA), the Miami International Arbitration Society (MIAS), and Future of Arbitration: Miami (FA: M), South Florida's first young arbitration practitioners» group, co-founded by Marike Paulsson in 2010.

Ms. Liebkind's previous experience includes working with international commercial and investment arbitration proceedings in Geneva, a secondment with Citibank as a part of their Nordic legal team, and IT and IP related disputes and contractual matters with a leading Finnish law firm in Helsinki.

During this time, students may attend and participate in a variety of law - related experiences of interest to them, such as a trial or arbitration, or conferences / seminars on legal issues.

Regular speaker and trainer on subjects related to international commercial arbitration, franchising law, civil procedure, testimony and expert testimony.

-- Pharmaceutical Company v. Insurers: Confidential arbitration proceedings relating to liability insurance and its application to US pharmaceutical risks (policy governed by New York Law) giving rise to issues as to the scope of cover / exclusion clauses.

His practice specializes in litigation, arbitration and mediation relating to corporate disputes, shareholder's rights, securities law, broadcasting / telecommunications, class actions and construction law.

Only one factor (improvements to the national arbitration law) directly related to formal legal infrastructure.

Law firm Stephenson Harwood LLP has secured an important arbitration related decision in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in favour of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) against IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd..

the Barbados Government in a Part XV and Annex VII United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea arbitration against Trinidad relating to maritime delimitation and hydrocarbon rights

The rules relating to conflicts of interest and bias under the national arbitration laws of England, France, Switzerland and the US is set out in the third section of the book, again illustrated with numerous key cases decided in those jurisdictions by the national courts.

The three dominant themes in 2008 cases where PIL was invoked were as follows: UK / EU law implementation of UNSC resolutions concerning freezing of alleged terrorist assets (sanctions cases); the acts / omissions of UK authorities in Iraq / Afghanistan viewed in the context of PIL and provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and Human Rights Act 1998 (Iraq / Afghanistan related cases); and state / diplomatic immunity in the context of civil proceedings and / or attempts to enforce arbitration awards against assets of State entities in the UK (Civil immunity cases).

TianTong offers clients a truly integrated service combining cutting - edge expertise and in - depth knowledge of arbitration related law and rules in major jurisdictions.

By way of update to our Litigation Funding in Singapore report on 3 August 2016, on 10 January 2017 the Singapore Parliament passed amendments to the Civil Law Act legalising third - party funding in arbitration and related proceedings in Singapore.

With litigation being a major forte, TianTong also renders professional service relating to arbitration, enforcement of judgement or arbitral awards and providing Chinese law expert opinions in foreign - related litigation and arbitration proceedings.

It shall not be out of place to mention that the limited scope of applicability of the Act has already been addressed by the revised Model Law, which states that provisions relating to, inter alia, interim measures shall apply irrespective of the fact that the place of arbitration is outside the country concerned.

a major European telecommunications company in three related arbitrations sited in Vienna under the Vienna Rules, with Polish and Austrian law applying, as well as parallel litigation proceedings in US district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (amount in dispute over $ 7 billion);

He has also recently represented a major European telecommunications company in three related arbitrations sited in Vienna, and related litigation proceedings in the United States, involving issues of Polish, Austrian and US law, and claims in excess of $ 2 billion.

a leading European manufacturing company in an ICC arbitration sited in London, with English and Japanese law applying, involving claims related to a share purchase agreement with a major Japanese industrial concern (amount in dispute over $ 3 billion);

a major international chemicals company in an ICC arbitration sited in Geneva, with Swiss law applying, against a group of related French corporations;

Homburger represents its clients before Swiss courts and arbitration tribunals in employment - related matters and advises on all employment law issues, in particular on: employment contracts for executives, including compensation packages, non-compete covenants and «golden parachutes»; standard employment contracts and customised employment concepts (contracts, regulations, employee handbooks); employee participation plans and variable compensation schemes (e.g., long - term incentive schemes, management participation on acquisitions, stock option plans, bonus and gratification schemes); transfer of business units and outsourcing; business restructuring (staff reduction, collective dismissals), contract and gardening leave; data protection; and posting of employees and work permit applications.

It found that it was common ground between the experts that under applicable Russian arbitration law at least one valid ground to set aside the award had been present, which related to the obligations on the arbitrators to disclose certain potential conflicts of interest.

For experience as an Arbitrator and Mediator and as counsel in arbitrations and mediations in disputes involving IPRs, trade secret / confidential information disputes, contractual disputes involving the same and related competition law / anti-trust disputes - again, please see the JAMS Bio under «Experience in Arbitration «and «Experience in Mediation.»

The first law provided Mexico's tax court with the exclusive jurisdiction over claims relating to public contracts (which the dispute in the arbitration arose under) and moreover, retroactively changed the statute of limitations to make a claim under public contracts from 10 years to 45 days.

MARTIN C. BRYCE, JR. [email protected] 215.864.8238 view full bio Martin C. Bryce, Jr., has a diverse practice focused on mortgage - related litigation, including foreclosures, credit card - related litigation, arbitration, commercial law, and class action defense.

Ms. Narancio's international arbitration practice includes representation in both institutional and ad hoc arbitrations (including under the ICC, LCIA, SIAC, NAI and UNCITRAL rules) sited in both common and civil law jurisdictions, and has particular experience with issues relating to Latin American jurisdictions.

Titled «International Arbitration in Singapore: Legislation and Materials», the all - in - one reference book draws together, for the first time, all the international arbitration legislation in Singapore, along with a comprehensive collection of related laws and materials.

The Honourable Craig Perkins is counsel at Martha McCarthy & Company LLP, offering mediation and arbitration of family law disputes and related matters.

With a combined value of more than RMB5 billion, the deals included more than 30 domestic arbitration cases, more than 15 foreign - related arbitration cases, more than 10 domestic and foreign lawsuits, and two cases where it acted as expert witness on PRC law.

A series of related ICC arbitrations, sited in Geneva with Italian and Swiss law applying, involving the break - up of a telecommunications joint venture between German, French, and Italian parties, involving claims in excess of $ 10 billion.

In addition, Mr. Woods represents employers in areas of traditional labor law, including grievance arbitrations, unfair labor practice charges, union contract negotiations and other union - related matters.

Karen represents employers in employment litigation and arbitration matters involving a variety of claims, including claims concerning age, sex, gender, race, national origin, disability, religion, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, retaliation, misappropriation, gross negligence, breach of contract, defamation, tortious interference, covenants not to compete and other employment laws and related torts.

Comprising two founding partners internationally renowned for their international litigation and arbitration practice, three specialized partners in insolvency proceedings, associates specialised in insolvency and litigation, tax advisers and a dedicated criminal law team, Maravela Asociaţii is perfectly equipped in order to cover the entire range of dispute related matters, including commercial and investment arbitration, insolvency proceedings, fiscal litigations, fraud and business crime disputes.

Unless the parties agree otherwise, the parties, the arbitrator and JW will treat the arbitral proceedings, any related disclosures and / or discovery, and the decisions of the arbitrator, as confidential, except in connection with judicial proceedings ancillary to the arbitration, such as a judicial challenge to, or enforcement of, an award, or unless otherwise required by law or to protect a legal right of a party.

Represented an international financial institution in an UNCITRAL arbitration governed by Czech law with the arbitration seat in London relating to a shareholders» dispute.

Represented an international construction company in a SIAC arbitration governed by Korean law with the seat of arbitration in Singapore relating to a multi-million dollar joint venture dispute.

He's licensed to practice law in Florida, Louisiana and Texas, and is active in academics and legal research relating to arbitration and international commercial law and dispute resolution in general.