The judge also found that, based on the «competence - competence»
arbitration legal principle, the arbitrator should first decide questions of jurisdiction.
Not exact matches
Knowing that she was a sitting Judge and Justice helps clients to feel confident that her
arbitration decisions are objective and based on a solid
legal understanding as well as
principles of equity and fairness.
«The basic
principles by which the Regulation allocates jurisdiction, giving priority (subject to exceptions) to the domicile of the defendant, are entirely unsuited to
arbitration, in which the situs and governing law are generally chosen by the parties on grounds of neutrality, availability of
legal services and the unobtrusive effectiveness of the supervisory jurisdiction.
It is strongly argued by many that
arbitration should always be subject to the fundamental
principles which underpin most domestic
legal systems and ultimately reflect the rule of law — and should not, as some contend, be a process which is totally detached from those fundamental
principles.
It is therefore very helpful for a single practitioner work, such as this, to gather together the most important rules, guidelines and so - called «soft law» on the subject, to set out the key
principles applicable in each type of
arbitration, and to provide illustrative cases from a number of different jurisdictions and
legal traditions.
International
Arbitration: Law and Practice, Second Edition The second edition of International
Arbitration: Law and Practice provides a concise overview of the
legal principles and practice of international
arbitration.
... [B] y choosing
arbitration, the parties and their lawyers are giving priority to the decision of the specific case under existing law over the refinement of
legal principles over time.
The Federal
Arbitration Act (the Act) makes
arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2, establishes an equal - treatment
principle: A court may invalidate an
arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on
legal rules that «apply only to
arbitration or that derive their meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.
The Mauritian
legal framework on international
arbitration brings international
arbitration principles in an entirely new body of rules, completely separate from those governing domestic
arbitration, and which are designed in line with international
principles and practices underlying the UNCITRAL Model Law on
arbitration.