Not exact matches
If those efforts fail, by using our Site or other online service, you agree that any complaint, dispute, or disagreement you may have
against NBCUniversal, and any
claim that NBCUniversal may have
against you, arising out
of, relating to, or connected in any way with these Terms
of Service, our Privacy Policy, or any NBCUniversal Transactions or Relationships shall be resolved exclusively by final and binding
arbitration («
Arbitration») administered by JAMS or its successor («JAMS») and conducted in accordance with the JAMS Streamlined
Arbitration Rules And Procedures in effect at the time the
Arbitration is initiated or, if the amount in controversy exceeds $ 100,000, in accordance with the JAMS Comprehensive
Arbitration Rules And Procedures then in effect (respectively, the «Applicable Rules»).
The Philippines brought an
arbitration case in 2013 over the South China Sea, eventually lodging 15
claims against China related to the U.N. Convention on the Law
of the Sea — a critical piece
of international law that both countries have ratified.
According to Bullard, «the DOL has laid out in detail written documentation examples
of material conflicts
of interest and the firm's program for mitigating them, which is a virtual roadmap — and also an evidentiary motherlode for bringing both
arbitration claims and class actions
against firms.»
If you desire to assert a
claim against Company, and you therefore elect to seek
arbitration, you must first send to Company, by certified mail, a written notice
of your
claim («Notice»).
The one exception to the exclusivity
of arbitration is that you have the right to bring an individual
claim against the Company in a small -
claims court
of competent jurisdiction.
Upon receipt
of an
arbitration claim, OkCupid may assert any counterclaims it may have
against the complaining party.
YOU UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BY JOINING OUR WEBApp OR CREATING A FREE PROFILE YOU SPECIFICALLY WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE AS A CLASS REPRESENTATIVE OR CLASS MEMBER IN ANY CLASS ACTION OR
CLAIM OR COLLECTIVE ACTION OR
CLAIM YOU MAY HAVE
AGAINST THE COMPANY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY RIGHT TO CLASS
ARBITRATION OR ANY CONSOLIDATION
OF INDIVIDUAL
ARBITRATION OR JOINING ANY
CLAIM WITH THE
CLAIM OF ANY OTHER PERSON OR ENTITY IN A LAWSUIT OR ANY OTHER PROCEEDING.
To begin with, you agree that that any
claim that you might have
against us regarding these Terms
of Use, the Tubi Services, or the Properties must be resolved through binding
arbitration before the American
Arbitration Association using its Commercial
Arbitration Rules.
If you have any dispute with or
claim against us or any of our affiliates (a «Claim») arising out of or relating to the Application or this Agreement, and the claim is not resolved by calling our customer service department at (877) 4 - SHOWTIME -LRB-(877) 474-6984), you and we each agree to resolve such disputes through an individual binding arbitration or an individual action in small claims c
claim against us or any
of our affiliates (a «
Claim») arising out of or relating to the Application or this Agreement, and the claim is not resolved by calling our customer service department at (877) 4 - SHOWTIME -LRB-(877) 474-6984), you and we each agree to resolve such disputes through an individual binding arbitration or an individual action in small claims c
Claim») arising out
of or relating to the Application or this Agreement, and the
claim is not resolved by calling our customer service department at (877) 4 - SHOWTIME -LRB-(877) 474-6984), you and we each agree to resolve such disputes through an individual binding arbitration or an individual action in small claims c
claim is not resolved by calling our customer service department at (877) 4 - SHOWTIME -LRB-(877) 474-6984), you and we each agree to resolve such disputes through an individual binding
arbitration or an individual action in small
claims court.
You and Velocity Micro agree that any
claim, dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable
claims («Dispute»)
against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING
ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN
ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code
of Procedure then in effect.
If either you or we choose or elect
arbitration of any
claim, dispute, or controversy, (which may be without the other's consent), any claim, dispute or controversy by either you or us against the other (or against the employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, beneficiaries, agents or assigns of the other) arising from or relating in any way to your Account, transactions on your Account, our relationship, this Agreement or any provisions of this Agreement, any prior Agreement, any disclosures, advertising, or application (hereafter «Claim» or «Claims»), including Claims regarding the applicability or validity of this arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitra
claim, dispute, or controversy, (which may be without the other's consent), any
claim, dispute or controversy by either you or us against the other (or against the employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, beneficiaries, agents or assigns of the other) arising from or relating in any way to your Account, transactions on your Account, our relationship, this Agreement or any provisions of this Agreement, any prior Agreement, any disclosures, advertising, or application (hereafter «Claim» or «Claims»), including Claims regarding the applicability or validity of this arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitra
claim, dispute or controversy by either you or us
against the other (or
against the employees, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, beneficiaries, agents or assigns
of the other) arising from or relating in any way to your Account, transactions on your Account, our relationship, this Agreement or any provisions
of this Agreement, any prior Agreement, any disclosures, advertising, or application (hereafter «
Claim» or «Claims»), including Claims regarding the applicability or validity of this arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by binding arbitra
Claim» or «
Claims»), including
Claims regarding the applicability or validity
of this
arbitration clause, shall be resolved exclusively and finally by binding
arbitration.
Without limiting your right to file
arbitration claims against Capital One Investing under FINRA Rule 12200 or its affiliates or successors, you consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue
of the federal and state courts in King County, Washington for any court action or proceeding relating to your Account and you agree that all such
claims by you
against us or our affiliates or successors will be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue
of the federal and state courts in King County, State
of Washington.
Restricting schools that participate in the federal student loan program from using abusive
arbitration clauses (also known as «rip - off clauses») and class action bans to silence students» complaints, force students to «go it alone» with any
claims they have
against their school, and keep students» fraud
claims against schools out
of court;
First, with regard to the judicial avenues foreign investors have
against host - states, three come to mind: (a) bringing a
claim before an investor - state tribunal; (b) bringing a
claim before a domestic court, based on domestic and / or international standards
of protection; and (c) private commercial
arbitration based on a contract between the investor and the host ‑ State.
representing Indonesian ship owners in an
arbitration under the auspices
of the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA) to
claim against charterers for breach
of a contract for the carriage
of coal
In a recent highlight, the frequently recommended Rupert Bellinghausen defended an international industrial services provider
against damage
claims for breach
of warranty as part
of a post-M & A
arbitration.
Japanese green energy company in Hong Kong
arbitration against claims by a Chinese hydroelectric company arising out
of the termination
of a sale and purchase agreement for carbon credits pursuant to the Kyoto protocol
A «
Claim» is defined under the Policy as «a demand including service
of suit or institution
of arbitration proceedings, for money
against an Insured...» All
Claims (written demand in letter form, suits, demands for
arbitration, etc.) should be sent to:
Main contractor in Hong Kong
arbitration against government department for
claims arising out
of the construction
of a river training scheme
Obtained
arbitration award for a large Internet company
against an overreaching landlord which had made
claims related to the lease
of client's primary office.
Asian independent power producer in Hong Kong
arbitration claiming damages
against manufacturer and supplier
of gas turbines arising out
of long term operation and maintenance contract for a combined cycle power plant
Mr Maksimov was accused
of dealing with assets in breach
of worldwide freezing orders that had been granted
against him and companies associated with him in support
of claims for more than US$ 200 million brought in LCIA
arbitration proceedings.
representing an international aerospace construction group in an
arbitration (SIAC) to
claim against their subcontractors for wrongful repudiation
of contract and for defective works
Compelling to
arbitration — and ultimately obtaining dismissal with prejudice
of all
claims — a statewide putative class and representative action brought
against a craft store chain in the U.S. District Court for the Central District
of California that involved meal and rest break, failure to pay wages, inaccurate wage statements, unfair business practices, and PAGA
claims;
While our firm attempts to negotiate and settle cases as early on as possible, our skilled litigators represent clients in mediation and
arbitration proceedings and vigorously defend
against medical malpractice
claims at all stages
of the litigation process, including appeals.
Represented financial services client in interrelated court and
arbitration proceedings raising employee raiding, non-compete and other business tort
claims - obtained dismissal
of all
claims against client and won six - figure counterclaim
As a result
of this most recent decision, the deceased resident's estate will be permitted to pursue its wrongful death
claims against the nursing home through the court system rather than through
arbitration.
The Claimants pursued
claims against the Kurdistan Regional Government valued at over US$ 39 billion in the
arbitration, which related to the exploration and development
of two gas fields in the Kurdistan Region
of Iraq.
Party Appointed Arbitrator in UNCITRAL
arbitration (Zurich seat but held in London) where an oil company
claimed against Eastern European state for alleged wrongful termination
of concession.
Employers» mandatory
arbitration agreements are coming under close scrutiny in the aftermath
of a high profile case involving defense contractor KBR's (a Halliburton subsidiary) attempt to compel Jamie Leigh Jones to arbitrate
claims of rape and harassment
against the company.
If a forum state's courts have «general jurisdiction» over a defendant, this means that the defendant can be sued in that forum on any cause
of action
against that defendant arising anywhere in the world, regardless
of any other relationship that the
claim has to the forum state (except for
claims in the exclusive jurisdiction
of the federal courts which can be brought in a U.S. District Court located in the same state, or in an
arbitration forum pursuant to a valid
arbitration clause that binds the parties, an issue beyond the scope
of this question and answer).
Another thorny area is that
of the dispute settlement procedures included in nearly all BITs, which allows for a private party to bring a
claim directly
against a State before an
arbitration tribunal.
He has turned an
arbitration over his termination during the probationary period
of his employment in 1999 into a legal battle that apparently continues today, including allegations
of bias
against members
of the BC Labour Relations Board (which were noted as being without merit), a Statement
of Claim against the BC Attorney General (and others) which was dismissed as an abuse
of process, and the attempted swearing
of two informations
against a vice chair
of the BC LRB (which the court found there was no evidence to support).
Representing the French investor in an ICSID
arbitration against Hungary over
claims in connection with the state's take - over
of the prepaid meal and services vouchers sector under the France - Hungary Bilateral Investment Treaty
Arbitration —
Claim in arbitration rejected and costs awarded against claimant — Appeal against arbitration award for serious irregularity — Application by defendant for security for the costs of the application and security for the costs award — Effect of claim being funded by litigation funders — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70
Claim in
arbitration rejected and costs awarded
against claimant — Appeal
against arbitration award for serious irregularity — Application by defendant for security for the costs
of the application and security for the costs award — Effect
of claim being funded by litigation funders — Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70
claim being funded by litigation funders —
Arbitration Act 1996, sections 68 (2)(d), 70 (5) and 70 (6).
2015 saw the total value
of claims funded by Therium break the $ 5 billion mark with litigation and
arbitration cases in the UK, Europe, Asia - Pacific and in the Americas, including high profile cases such as the shareholder group action
against Lloyds Banking Group over the acquisition
of HBOS at the peak
of the financial crisis.
The Lawyer describes Emily as instructed in weighty disputes, citing her recent defence
of Barclays
against a $ 240m indemnity
claim by UniCredit, the major Italian bank, in respect
of a sophisticated structured finance deal between the two banks and that she acted for the UAE's Crescent Petroleum in knocking out an attempt by the National Iranian Oil Company to challenge an
arbitration award
against it.
Glencore, Eco Oro, Cosigo and Claro have either already brought or are in the process
of bringing
claims against the Colombian state in various international
arbitration centres.
Therefore, the homologation process in Ecuador implies that the party that seeks the enforcement
of a foreign award shall file a petition with the Provincial Court8, which will assess whether the award complies with the following requirements: (i) The international award complies with the formalities required for it to be considered authentic in the state where it was issued; (ii) The award is final and binding in the jurisdiction where it was delivered and the attachments are duly legalized; (iii) With regard to the requirement prescribed in the Convention, if the award is in a language other than the official language
of the country, in this case Spanish, it shall incorporate a translation; (iv) It is shown from the legal papers
of the
arbitration proceedings that the party
against whom the awards is being enforced was duly notified
of the
claim and that there was no due process violation; (v) The petition must specify the domicile
of the party
against whom the award is being enforced.
In Colombia, a series
of significant
claims against the State for an alleged breach
of its obligations under free trade agreements or investment protection agreements has shown that
arbitration is one
of the most important tools at the disposal
of independent investors to protect them
against the possible breach
of these agreements.
Lexis's
arbitration clause requires any customer with a
claim against it to arbitrate the
claim in the headquarters city
of Lexis, which is apparently Dayton, Ohio.
Interested in litigation,
arbitration, and resolution
of any
claim, damage, or dispute near or far, state or federal, big or small, and for, or
against.
The response to the notice
of arbitration may also include: (a) Any plea that an arbitral tribunal to be constituted under these Rules lacks jurisdiction; (b) A proposal for the appointment
of a sole arbitrator referred to in article 8, paragraph 1; (c) Notification
of the designation
of an arbitrator referred to in articles 9 or 10; (d) A brief description
of counterclaims or
claims for the purpose
of a set - off, if any, including where relevant, an indication
of the amounts involved, and the relief or remedy sought; (e) A notice
of arbitration in accordance with article 3 in case the respondent formulates a
claim against a party to the
arbitration agreement other than the claimant.
German bank — various # multimillion
arbitration claims in the International Chamber
of Commerce Paris and The London Court
of International
Arbitration against London based insurance syndicates.
Representing Bermudian excess insurer in Bermuda Form
arbitration concerning
claims brought
against manufacturer
of herbicide which allegedly caused property damage
Representation
of investor in expropriation
claim against the Russian Federation in BIT
arbitration in Stockholm that secured the first award holding that the Russian measures taken
against Yukos Oil Company amounted to expropriation
Save for intentional wrongdoing, the parties waive, to the fullest extent permitted under the applicable law, any
claim against the arbitrators, any person appointed by the arbitral tribunal, the BVI IAC and its employees, including the CEO, any member
of its Secretariat and any member
of any Challenge Committee in respect
of any act or omission in connection with the
arbitration.
-- Instructed by Clifford Chance (as junior to Joe Smouha QC) to act for the respondent to an application under section 68
of the
Arbitration Act 1996 challenging an LCIA award concerning a # 480 million
claim for breach
of contract — Instructed by Slaughter and May (as junior to David Streatfeild James QC) in an ICC
arbitration involving a
claim against a German conglomerate in the industrial sector.
Represented an oil field equipment supplier before the Iran - U.S.
Claims Tribunal in an UNCITRAL Rules
arbitration against Iran for expropriation
of assets.
Accordingly, all
claims made by or
against Dubai World and its subsidiaries must be brought before the Special Tribunal, with the exception
of claims which are subject to a binding
arbitration agreement; as decided by the first Practice Direction issued by the Special Tribunal on 30 March 2010, which had stated that it will be the policy
of the Special Tribunal to respect and enforce
arbitration agreements.