It's a little odd because the Directors Guild actually has
arbitration rules meant to settle these kinds of disputes, so I'm not sure how far this goes in an actual court, but the suit was enough to get TIFF to pull London Fields from the lineup, mercifully sparing unsuspecting audiences from this garbage movie.
Not exact matches
Judge Edward Chen's class - action
ruling would
mean that the lawsuit would apply to all California Uber drivers, except those who waived their right to class - action
arbitration.
In a statement, Uber said it will appeal, but that the
arbitration portion of Chen's
ruling means a «tiny fraction» of a potential 160,000 California drivers are eligible to be class members.
The
rule, which will go into effect for new accounts in about eight months, will not prohibit individual forced
arbitration —
meaning individual consumers (as opposed to groups of consumers) could still be be blocked from going to court against financial firms.
The exclusive
means of resolving any dispute or claim arising out of or relating to these Terms of Use (including any alleged breach thereof), the Service, or the Website shall be BINDING
ARBITRATION administered by the American
Arbitration Association under the Consumer
Arbitration Rules.
Even when it is clear which ethical
rules apply, differing cultural and legal backgrounds may
mean that lawyers involved in the same
arbitration may act differently based on conflicting ideas about what is professional and ethical conduct.
Streford issued proceedings before the High Court asserting that the disciplinary process, constituted by
means of
arbitration provided for by the
rules, was in breach of the Convention, Art 6.
Were the DRC to ratify UNICTRAL's
rules the country would be required to enforce any international
arbitration rulings against state entities — which
means they may look for exceptions in the face of such decisions, should the bodies be so minded.
If the parties are unable to resolve a Dispute by informal
means, the
arbitration of Disputes will be administered by the American
Arbitration Association (AAA), in accordance with its Commercial
Arbitration Rules, and if deemed appropriate by the arbitrator, the Supplementary Procedures for Consumer - Related Disputes.
The court's
ruling on the proper interpretation not only resolves the issue for those parties, but
means the law can be correctly applied in other
arbitration cases.
It prescribed the
means of service of those documents which had to be so served whilst the Court was free to use its own
Rules to authorise service of documents on the KRG in any way it chose, whether in Iraq or elsewhere, including in particular the
means which were to be adopted and which were ordered in the ex parte order, namely service on the lawyers in London acting for the KRG in the
arbitration under the terms of RDC 9.31 and / or 43.11 and / or 43.69.
The Federal
Arbitration Act (the Act) makes
arbitration agreements «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,» 9 U.S.C. ¶ 2, establishes an equal - treatment principle: A court may invalidate an
arbitration agreement based on «generally applicable contract defenses,» but not on legal
rules that «apply only to
arbitration or that derive their
meaning from the fact that an agreement to arbitrate is at issue,» AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333, 339.
On March 5, the Supreme Court
ruled that the federal appeals court in Washington should not have vacated the award, holding that nothing in the treaty overcame the normal assumption in US law that arbitrators rather than courts should decide disputes over the
meaning of procedural conditions to
arbitration.
In fact, lawyers with either a commercial
arbitration or a public international law background — the two approaches that most actively shape international investment law and
arbitration at present — stress such a limited function of
arbitration, while having divergent views on what the
rule of law may
mean in this context.
Those coming from commercial
arbitration tend to stress the private nature of dispute settlement; for them the
rule of law
means faithfulness to party consent, party autonomy, and sanctity of contracts.
This
means that intra-EU investment
arbitration can survive only to the extent that (i) arbitrators are willing to disregard the implications of EU law incompatibility on their jurisdiction, (ii)
arbitration is seated and awards enforced outside the EU, and (iii) national courts in non-EU jurisdictions are willing to defy the CJEU's
ruling.
(1) The Centre and parties to an
arbitration under these
Rules may deliver any written communications required or permitted under these
Rules personally, by mail, by facsimile, by email or by other
means of telecommunication which provide a record of delivery.
National
arbitration statutes generally contain only limited provisions on disclosure and recognise parties» autonomy to determine procedural issues, while institutional
rules usually give tribunals a wide discretion in relation to disclosure, ranging from ordering parties to produce any documents they consider relevant (Art 22 (1)(e), LCIA Rules), to granting them a general mandate to establish facts through appropriate means (Art 25, ICC Ru
rules usually give tribunals a wide discretion in relation to disclosure, ranging from ordering parties to produce any documents they consider relevant (Art 22 (1)(e), LCIA
Rules), to granting them a general mandate to establish facts through appropriate means (Art 25, ICC Ru
Rules), to granting them a general mandate to establish facts through appropriate
means (Art 25, ICC
RulesRules).