Sentences with phrase «archeological evidence for»

This date is consistent, however, with the expansion of O. rufipogon populations after the Last Glacial Maximum ∼ 18 ka and archeological evidence for early wild rice management in China.
We have archeological evidence for the existence of almost all revered historical figures dating back to the stone age.
They absolutely didn't say that because there is no archeological evidence for it, evolution didn't happen.
Regarding archeological evidence for Biblical places and persons: Sure there is some, but there is not one single shred of evidence for the supernatural beings or events alleged to have been present there.
Should America be abandoned for 2000 years we would have archeological evidence for the existence of New York.
So, while there is so much archeological evidence for subjects and places in the bible, we now know, there truly is the possibility of an existence of «beings» outside our means to see or detect.
I believe one of the more overwhelming testimonies regarding the depth of archeological evidence for the New Testament is in the account of the famous historian and archeologist Sir William Ramsay.

Not exact matches

For a time, that led scientists to look for archeological evidence that there might have been a great global flood at some time in human pre-history, before recorded history, when stories were passed down oralFor a time, that led scientists to look for archeological evidence that there might have been a great global flood at some time in human pre-history, before recorded history, when stories were passed down oralfor archeological evidence that there might have been a great global flood at some time in human pre-history, before recorded history, when stories were passed down orally.
Two concessions must of course be granted to the relativist: (1) different bodies of evidence will be available at different times (in the wake, for example, of archeological research or of document discoveries), and (2) different frameworks of interpretation of available evidence will come to light (in the course, for example, of medical or psychological research).
For one, there is no archeological or any other type of hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide floFor one, there is no archeological or any other type of hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide flofor the Bible's worldwide flood.
There is zero archeological evidence, and there are no scientifically and historically validated evidence for the core claims of the Mormon fraud.
Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...
Thousands of years of recorded history, none of which has ever been disproved, and note, the years 2500 — 30AD are all years for which we have some archeological evidence.
Importantly, the archeological evidence reveals that people were not just crafting new technology, but traveling farther to get more desirable materials for their tools.
Kerby added that archeological evidence suggests that caribou have used this area as a calving site for over 3,000 years.
New archeological evidence points to the Celts having weaved tartans for over 3000 years.
Archeological evidence in the form of whale remains discovered in burial mounds suggests that whales have been consumed in Japan since the Jōmon period Free online dating site for singles.
Cave paintings and other archeological evidence prove that humans and dogs have been hunting partners for at least 20,000 years.
When you cross the highway bisecting the archeological zone, you leave behind unpleasant murals and evidence of human sacrifice, for these are buildings from pre-Toltec times.
This hypothesis provoked a major debate, with some 50 papers published for or against it in the last decade, but with a favorable shift in the last few years based on emerging archeological evidence.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z