Sentences with phrase «archeological evidence of»

Of her works she says, «I think of trash as... the archeological evidence of the present moment.

Despite the lack of archeological evidence of permanent settlements on the island, Chumash legend holds that the American Indian population of the Channel Islands began on Anacapa.

Although there were no archeological evidence of a sheath dress among the elite, women and deities are shown wearing said garment in tomb drawings.

There is archeological evidence of food fermentation dating more than 9,000 years ago.

We therefore sequenced two ancient horse genomes from Taymyr, Russia (at 7.4 - and 24.3-fold coverage), both predating the earliest archeological evidence of domestication.

We can't use the argument that although there is no archeological evidence that proves evolution, we are going to believe in evolution, and then say because there is no archeological evidence of the exodus, or of Abraham, or Moses, we are not going to believe they existed.

Likewise, just because there is no archeological evidence of the exodus doesn't mean it didn't take place.

But then I thought, «wait, we do have archeological evidence of Egyptian cats.

The first events described in the bible that are independently confirmable through archeological evidence of written texts from other countries are almost all within the Iron Age.

No Roman records, no contemporary writers of any kind, no archeological evidence of any kind, not even any records from the Jewish temple - NOTHING!

Archeological evidences of human activities found under receding glaciers, don't support the claims of a «drastic» change on the climate.

Not exact matches

I believe one of the more overwhelming testimonies regarding the depth of archeological evidence for the New Testament is in the account of the famous historian and archeologist Sir William Ramsay.

There have been archeological finds that have shown physical evidence that at least some of the stories in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are true.

By the second century, Roman soldiers were bringing their new faith to Britain, and in the middle of the third century St. Alban became Britain's first known Christian martyr, but we don't know much more about who these Christians were, and it is here that Malcolm Lambert begins in Pagans and Christians: The Conversion of Britain from Alban to Bede, producing a captivating narrative by squeezing what he can» but no more» from archeological evidence (mostly from burial sites) and the limited historical record.

So, while there is so much archeological evidence for subjects and places in the bible, we now know, there truly is the possibility of an existence of «beings» outside our means to see or detect.

The archeological evidence in Palestine reveals with pitiful adequacy the common sacrifice of little children as offerings to the gods.

There are over 20,000 archeological digs confirming the places and events recorded in scripture, and many more pieces of evidence of the historical accuracy of the Bible.

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leavof DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leavOF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

Two concessions must of course be granted to the relativist: (1) different bodies of evidence will be available at different times (in the wake, for example, of archeological research or of document discoveries), and (2) different frameworks of interpretation of available evidence will come to light (in the course, for example, of medical or psychological research).

Should America be abandoned for 2000 years we would have archeological evidence for the existence of New York.

Are you saying that you no longer have any problem with evolution, the big bang theory, radio carbon dating, the age of the Earth, the scientific unlikelihood of the great flood, and the archeological evidence against the chronology of the bible story?

For one, there is no archeological or any other type of hard evidence for the Bible's worldwide flood.

I've seen enough archeological evidence to support the claims of the Book of Mormon that the people that lived in the ancient America's really did exist when and how the book describes.

You use archeological and geological evidence to support your claim that a huge wave did rip through the middle east where noah was, the flood story evolved from that but then you have to deal with the issues of a tsunami large enough to reach noah from the indian ocean without destroying the entire world.

1) This «discovery» is being announced without engaging prior archeological evidence on the matter 2) and the argument here appears to depend on an absence of evidence.

b) within that scholarship (which takes archeological studies VERY seriously), there is pre-existing evidences worthy of consideration.

Archeological evidence and literary analysis have helped us understand what biblical authors were saying in the context of their times, giving us a clearer picture of their developing religious insights.

Regarding archeological evidence for Biblical places and persons: Sure there is some, but there is not one single shred of evidence for the supernatural beings or events alleged to have been present there.

There is zero archeological evidence, and there are no scientifically and historically validated evidence for the core claims of the Mormon fraud.

How many archeological finds that need to be made of biblical buildings, evidence, etc..

Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...

Thousands of years of recorded history, none of which has ever been disproved, and note, the years 2500 — 30AD are all years for which we have some archeological evidence.

We have archeological evidence for the existence of almost all revered historical figures dating back to the stone age.

All of the archeological, sociological, psychological evidence strongly suggests that religion is a construct of man.

That Mormons believe that Native Americas are directly decedents of ancient Israeli peoples and as such are Jewish contrary to all genetic, archeological, and linguistic evidence.

By comparing the results of agent - based models against real archeological evidence, anthropologists can identify past conditions and circumstances that led different civilizations around the world into periods of growth and decline.

The results are «clear - cut» and confirm the migration patterns researchers had supposed based on archeological evidence, says population geneticist Lounès Chikhi of the French national research agency CNRS in Toulouse, France.

To further refine the probability estimates, they took into account past (prior to recorded history) tsunamis — evidence of which is preserved in geological layers in coastal sediments, volcanic tephras, and archeological sites.

«To untangle the history of domestication,» Denham said, «scientists will need to bring to bear all of the evidence at their disposal, including archeological and ethnographic evidence, and the analysis of both modern and ancient DNA.»

Revolt and civil war among the Maya in 1221 CE, evidenced by archeological findings of burned buildings, led to Chichen Itza's decline and rulership over Yucatán shifted to Mayapan.

Other archeological and fossil evidence, Cooke says, suggests the earliest human populations in Jamaica were foragers who lived off of available local resources, together with some cultivation of native island and mainland plants.

There are currently hundreds of archeological sites in the Everglades, and almost every tree island has evidence of prehistoric human occupation; unfortunately, most tree islands have not been archeologically investigated.

This date is consistent, however, with the expansion of O. rufipogon populations after the Last Glacial Maximum ∼ 18 ka and archeological evidence for early wild rice management in China.

The archeological record shows that in every measurable way human health declined with this transition, with clear evidence of physical degeneration, including a loss of height and bone density, and a dramatic increase in dental and skeletal problems.

Fossil remains and archeological findings provide strong evidence on the food habits of Paleolithic ancestors.

Recent archeological evidence shows that at least some ancient Egyptians had coronary artery disease, the hardening of the arteries and.

Archeological evidence in the form of whale remains discovered in burial mounds suggests that whales have been consumed in Japan since the Jōmon period Free online dating site for singles.

With thousands of marriages, dozens of babies born Archeological evidence in the form of whale remains discovered in burial mounds suggests that whales have been consumed in Japan since the Jōmon period

2005 «In a riveting and fast - paced history, massing archeological, anthropological, scientific and literary evidence, Mann debunks much of what we thought we knew about pre-Columbian America.

Archeological evidence suggests that the earliest civilizations arose in this region of the world where plants were first cultivated and the first livestock were domesticated.