Sentences with phrase «archeological record»
The phrase "archeological record" refers to all the physical remains and artifacts that have been discovered and studied by archaeologists. It includes things like tools, buildings, pottery, bones, and other objects that provide evidence of past human activity. The archaeological record helps us understand and piece together information about ancient civilizations and cultures. Full definition
As shown in archeological records, they established a number of settlements such as Caracol, Lamanai and Lubaantun.
chabilmarvillas.com
I'll go with proven archeological records any day.
Now if you asked me if the God that created the universe could have formed an earth complete with a mysterious archeological record, I say, «yep».
Peaches are widely thought to have originated in China, but the oldest evidence had been archeological records dating back roughly 8,000 years.
They point out the decrease in stature and increase in dental malformations that are apparent in the human archeological record shortly after the Agricultural Revolution as key indications of our need to avoid them.
The deciphering of the Maya script since the 1970s also helped to create a vivid account of the Mayan past with names, dates and individuals rather than just an anonymous archeological record.
Piecing together multiple institutional and archeological records coming from sources across borders, Halilaj makes the full extent of the findings in Runik available to the public for the first time.
Subjects are photographed surrounded by their trash in a setting that is part nest, part archeological record.
There is no fossial records other than an extict chimp, there is no archeological records, but there is a darn good theory.
«And the coast of Og king of Bashan, which as of the remnant of the giants...» Why is there no record of any of these giants in the archeological record?
If your going to go against the archeological record, at least get it right.
WHAT so - called «archeological records» have EVER PROPHESIED the rebirth of Israel???? Please explain.
Live4lies — «The archeological record also prophesied the rebirth of Israel» WHAT on earth are you babbling about?
The Bible can't be an archeological record — too many inaccuracies.
The archeological record also prophesied the rebirth of Israel (Eze 37) and it was fulfilled in 1948.
No Roman records, no temple records, no archeological records, nothing independently verifiable.
«The diversification of modern Native Americans appears to have started around 13,000 years ago when the first unique Native American culture appears in the archeological record: the Clovis culture,» said Nielsen.
However, these items are rare in the archeological record and are hard to link to particular individuals.
Given the fragility of bird bones and their poor preservation in the fossil and archeological record, it may be some time before we can narrow down the date any further.
What does the archeological record tell us about changes in subsistence behaviors, cognitive abilities, social life?
What is the relationship between the archeological record and the anatomical record of human evolution in Africa during the past 600,000 years?
The archeological record shows that in every measurable way human health declined with this transition, with clear evidence of physical degeneration, including a loss of height and bone density, and a dramatic increase in dental and skeletal problems.
Studies have indicated that dogs are the oldest domesticated species, and likely originated even well before their first appearance in the archeological record 15,000 years ago where, the initial change to the diagnostic phenotype of domestic dogs was perhaps due in part to selection pressures associated with the transition from hunter gatherer to more sedentary lifestyles.
Archeological records have dated the arrival of the Maya to what is now Belize to 2500 B.C. when they arrived in the Cuello area in the northern part of the country.
The archeological record suggests that once past the...
My guess, FWIW, is that there is a lot of cultural (and perhaps even neurological) development going on between the first «anatomically modern» humans 200,000 years back (and, according to recent finds, now further back than that) and the «Upper Paleolithic,» which is the period ~ 50,000 years ago when we start to see differentiation and development of stone tool technologies in the archeological record:
The archeological record of the Anasazi and the region's other ancient civilizations makes this enduring vulnerability clear.
geological activity has produced some subsidence within the region of the Mediterranean, but this is not affecting the Archeological record Simply stating what you believe without giving any proof is also not very convincing in matters of science.