Dr. Oliver must surely realize the Warmist conspiracy built Hadrian's Wall to keep
arctic air from spoiling XIV and minus XIV's claim to be the two warmist years on record?
It is affected by three air sources: cold, dry,
arctic air from the north (dominant factor during the 100 % Free online dating in Kingston.
Not exact matches
Although Tony and I are more than happy to see it go —
from the snow and the frigid
arctic air.
On the downside, there was quite a bit of driveline shudder on upshifts, especially into the higher gears; also, the automatic climate control system seemed to deliver a similar blast of
arctic air whether it was set at 67 or 75 degrees, requiring manual fan control to keep
from freezing occupants.
I think what Alastair is alluding to is the fact that, say by 2050 when the
arctic ocean will conceivably be ice - free in the summer, the atmosphere will have a much higher relative humidity than it has currently because of the open
air = water interface, so this will have a magnifying effect beyond just the feedback
from increased CO2.
from the
air every stream had good flow
from permafrost melt, there is little snow as the
arctic is quite dry.
Hansen got the warming right in the 1980s, the hockey stick is validated by numerous oth alternative research methods and ocean heat content and
arctic ice continue to rise and shrink as predicted
from the understanding of the physical effect of CO2, as have
air temperatures in the area.
Ice as polystyrene full of
air was insulating the water
from the winter coldness — minus ice; water absorbs extra coldness — in combination of the coldness
from the
air and extra coldness in the water = that double coldness as ripples goes south — intercepts 95 % INSTEAD OF 50 % of the moisture and is dropping it in Europe / USA — end result: SOUTH MUCH MORE SNOW AND COLDNESS — NO MOISTURE TO REPLENISH THE ICE DEFICIT ON
ARCTIC.
So is moist
air carried
from the
arctic sufficient to create the extra snowfall?
I would say that's weather not climate change but I already got the lecture on how global warming causes freezing in the prairies by disrupting wind patterns so more cold
air gets drawn down
from the
arctic warming it more so ice melts more, or some such folderol.
A good point as
arctic regions that are hit with warmer water streams will prevent sea ice extent while those with colder ones can massivly increase in volume when the
air is cold enough though no growth would be visible
from the top down view.
Long story short, the polar vortex is the result of global warming changing the semi-permanent weather system over the
arctic regions resulting in movement of cold
air masses
from the
arctic region to parts of North America, such as Canada and, unfortunately, poor Buffalo.
When the low shifts as far south as Newfoundland, a high develops over northern Greenland; this brings cold
arctic air west
from northern Europe to be warmed by the Norwegian Current and thus warm Greenland and North America rather than Europe.
And that heat transfer
from as yet unfrozen seawater may generate the higher
arctic pressures that drive cold
air masses southward.
And, once the summer season is passed, the ever - colder
Arctic air masses remove even more heat
from the under - ice water up through the sea ice by conduction into the -25 deg
arctic air.
The «Beast
from the East» was the name given by the media to an unusual weather pattern which saw warmer that average temperatures over the
arctic sending colder
air further south than normal, resulting in much of western Europe being hit with sustained low temperatures and heavy snow, blown in
from Siberia.
Therefore, the effect of warming in the
arctic is cooling at the lower latitudes,
from increased albedo
from clouds and snow, and transportation of colder
air from the
arctic.
The moisture that fell on Florida, Washington, NY, Germany, and all the other places affected by the negative AO this winter was evaporated
from warm oceans and carried to the point that it collided with cold
air brought down
from the
arctic.