Sentences with phrase «arctic ice data»

I reckon ALL the sea and land temp data from GISS, Hadcrut, NDCD, NOAA and the arctic ice data from cryosphere and NCDC has been manipulated to suit the AGW agenda.

Not exact matches

The findings back up a body of data suggesting that «the effects of global [warming] will be seen first, and will be most pronounced, in the arctic region,» says Mark Serreze, an arctic climatologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colordata suggesting that «the effects of global [warming] will be seen first, and will be most pronounced, in the arctic region,» says Mark Serreze, an arctic climatologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, ColorData Center in Boulder, Colorado.

More data on impact of changing local weather patterns, maybe putting more personal ground - based perspective to melting arctic ice: http://www.alaskadispatch.com/article/20131202/winter-what-winter-barrows-october-november-downright-balmy (captcha: thanks ideafun)

For other indicators — glacial retreat, sea level, arctic ice extent, etc. — the data is equally noisy, and it is difficult having a sensible discussion without the inevitable cherry - picking on both sides of the argument.

Dr Maslowski made an estimate in 2007 which used data through 2004 and came up with 2013 as the first year with a total meltdown of arctic sea ice.

I remember when I once worked on a project for managing arctic ice rafar data in th 90's, the NASA project manager said that he had access to a room full of computer tapes of satellite data collected in the 70's that nobody had ever looked at, and that nobody he knew had equipment any more that could even read the tapes.

Canadian Ice Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter arctic ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictoIce Service, 4.7, Multiple Methods As with CIS contributions in June 2009, 2010, and 2011, the 2012 forecast was derived using a combination of three methods: 1) a qualitative heuristic method based on observed end - of - winter arctic ice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictoice thicknesses and extents, as well as an examination of Surface Air Temperature (SAT), Sea Level Pressure (SLP) and vector wind anomaly patterns and trends; 2) an experimental Optimal Filtering Based (OFB) Model, which uses an optimal linear data filter to extrapolate NSIDC's September Arctic Ice Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictoIce Extent time series into the future; and 3) an experimental Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) prediction system that tests ocean, atmosphere and sea ice predictoice predictors.

Chris V. CO2 goes up, temp goes down, oceans cool, sea levels decrease, arctic sea ice is within 1979 -2000 mean, AGW theory of catastrophic warming is B U S T... Even the fraudulent manipulation of the GISS data set does not change that.

Conversely, the arctic ice winter max increases slightly during that period, and temperature data for that region show a cooling.

I have been closely watching arctic ice for several years now and have reviewed the 2011 data pretty closely over the course of the year.

Satellite passive microwave data since the 1970s indicate a 3 % decrease per decade in arctic sea ice extent.

I'm aware of two most prominent reconstructions of arctic sea ice for the 20th century based on these data.

And, those who claim that in the mid-20th century the arctic was «practically ice - free» are contradicted by the data.

It's easy to get daily up - to - date data on arctic ice extent from JAXA, and on arctic ice area from cryosphere today.

I have downloaded the HADISST ice data and computed sea ice extent for both the arctic and antarctic (based on 15 % concentration to be consistent with NSIDC data from the satellite era).

And remember, the satellite data are one small part of a vast amount of data that overwhelmingly show our planet is warming up: retreating glaciers, huge amounts of ice melting at both poles, the «death spiral» of arctic ice every year at the summer minimum over time, earlier annual starts of warm weather and later starts of cold weather, warming oceans, rising sea levels, ocean acidification, more extreme weather, changing weather patterns overall, earlier snow melts, and lower snow cover in the spring...

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent based on May data.

Meanwhile, global sea ice has remained virtually unchanged for the last 30 years of satellite data, and has increased in the arctic over the last three years, making one wonder where the «enormous» heating is taking place.

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent based on July data.

The outlook for the pan-arctic sea ice extent in September 2008, based on July data, indicates a continuation of dramatic arctic sea ice loss.

Can't find a recent item on arctic sea ice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioIce Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed periods.

Incorporating AARI data should push down HadISST (at least most years between 1933 and 1952), but I don't see such thing (this is the previous version of HadISST arctic sea ice data: http://tamino.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/nhem140.jpg).

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), the arctic sea ice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoIce Data Center (NSIDC), the arctic sea ice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite record.

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2012 arctic sea ice extent for the June report (based on May data).

Regarding the arctic ice, do we have the data for the 1940s?

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent for the July report (based on June data).

The average arctic sea ice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometeice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometeIce Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometers.

increased hurricane severity = > wrong, and they admit it in AR5 increased hurricane frequency = > wrong, and they admit it in AR5 increased droughts = > wrong, and they admit it in AR5 increased flooding = > wrong, and they admit it in AR5 increased temps = > they won't admit it, but their own data says they were wrong declining arctic ice = > check.

On 27 June 2008 a request was issued to the arctic research community requesting input for the June 2008 Outlook Report on arctic sea ice conditions for September 2008, to update the May Outlook using June data.

Information about future summer arctic sea ice conditions based on 2008 data is inconclusive.

Information about future summer arctic sea ice conditions based on 2008 data is equivocal.

Figure is based on daily arctic sea ice extent from passive microwave satellite data (SSM / I).

So, yes, scientists are very much able to make a meaningful case for such data, and they do so quite lucidly in the IPCC assessments and in the NSICD's annual arctic ice extent reports.

Show me someone who has successfully determined arctic ice extent from weather data alone.

Satellite data and ground observations also indicate that ice conditions in the Nares Strait west of Greenland may favor an influx of old high arctic ice into the region later in the season.

The outlook for arctic sea ice for September 2009, based on June data, indicates a continuation of low pan-arctic sea ice extent and no indication that a return to historical levels will occur.

Satellite data since 1978 show that annual average arctic sea ice extent has shrunk by 2.7 [2.1 to 3.3] % per decade, with larger decreases in summer of 7.4 [5.0 to 9.8] % per decade.

We must remember that data only goes back for 30 years which is but a short window into the naturalcyclic nature of the arctic ice history.

There is the Cryosphere data from the University of Illinois which show arctic and Antarctic ice concentration and extent (this is not Mr. Watts data, it is satellite data.

But he also noted, «There is some indication from the QuickScat data that 2nd and 3rd year ice has increased somewhat in the past couple of years which may imply not so linear decline of arctic ice volume.»

It is not just data from climate models predicting what will happen; now there is evidence of the warming which has already occurred: massive ice melting in Greenland, rising sea levels and retreating arctic ice, record droughts, etc..

Just after the June Outlook was completed (based on May data), arctic sea ice extent briefly set record daily rates of loss.

The two - day FAMOS workshop will include sessions on 2017 sea ice highlights and sea ice / ocean predictions, reports of working groups conducting collaborative projects, large - scale arctic climate modeling (ice - ocean, regional coupled, global coupled), small (eddies) and very small (mixing) processes and their representation and / or parameterization in models, and new hypotheses, data sets, intriguing findings, proposals for new experiments and plans for 2018 FAMOS special volume of publications.

Wadhams has spent many years collecting ice thickness data from submarines passing below the arctic ocean.

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), arctic sea ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 19Ice Data Center (NSIDC), arctic sea ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 1Data Center (NSIDC), arctic sea ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 19ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 1data record since 1979.

Again it is important to remember that the Outlook values are for the mean arctic September sea ice extent as provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDice extent as provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDIce Data Center (NSIDC).

1930's arctic temperature data doesn't seem so far from the present phase but reconstructions that exist have the ice conditions very different.