Sentences with phrase «arctic ice extent for»

That was a major motivation to predict a significant positive shift in arctic ice extent for this September.

Not exact matches

For other indicators — glacial retreat, sea level, arctic ice extent, etc. — the data is equally noisy, and it is difficult having a sensible discussion without the inevitable cherry - picking on both sides of the argument.

I would expect, with global warming, with the ice melting earlier, this date would move forward for the high latitudes, and should also cause the date of minimun arctic ice extent to move foward also.

-- The Minimum Sea Ice Extent in the arctic was lower in 1990 than in 2006 — ie the arctic ice summer (September) minimum has been more - or-less stable for 16 yeaIce Extent in the arctic was lower in 1990 than in 2006 — ie the arctic ice summer (September) minimum has been more - or-less stable for 16 yeaice summer (September) minimum has been more - or-less stable for 16 years.

With 19 responses for the Pan-Arctic Outlook (plus 6 regional Outlook contributions), the June Sea Ice Outlook projects a September 2012 arctic sea extent median value of 4.4 million square kilometers, with quartiles of 4.3 and 4.7 million square kilometers (Figure 1).

Klazes (Public), 3.6 (95 % confidence interval of + / - 0.9), Statistical September extent is predicted using an estimated minimum value of the PIOMAS arctic sea ice volume and a simple model for volume - extent relationship.

As reported at Science Daily, in a new paper in Quaternary Science Reviews they report their findings: that the present extent of sea ice in the arctic is at its lowest for at least several thousand years.

There is also considerable observational evidence that arctic sea ice extent over the last few decades is much lower than it has been for at least a century prior to modern times.

I have downloaded the HADISST ice data and computed sea ice extent for both the arctic and antarctic (based on 15 % concentration to be consistent with NSIDC data from the satellite era).

If you agree with me that 4 years is too short term to be meaningful for a trend of arctic sea ice extent then why are you bothering me with it?

Now, since 2007, at the height of the global warming scare tactics about arctic sea ice, the antarctic sea ice extents anomaly CONTINUOUSLY exceeds 1.25 Mkm ^ 2 for 3 years straight now, and is larger than 1.5 Mkm ^ 2 so often for such long times that it is not even newsworthy on a skeptic site.

The July Outlook for arctic sea ice extent in September 2010 shows some notable adjustments from the June Outlook, with both downward and upward revisions from last month.

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent based on May data.

The June Outlook for arctic sea ice in September 2010 shows reasonable arguments for either a modest increase or decrease in September 2010 sea ice extent compared to the last two years (5.4 million square kilometers in 2009 and 4.7 million square kilometers in 2008).

Anyone ever seen the arctic ice extent completely flat - line for 4 days in December before?

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent based on July data.

With 19 responses for the pan-arctic (and 7 for the regional outlook), including several new contributors, the June Sea Ice Outlook projects a September 2011 arctic sea extent median value of 4.7 million square kilometers (Figure 1).

The outlook for the pan-arctic sea ice extent in September 2008, based on July data, indicates a continuation of dramatic arctic sea ice loss.

Can't find a recent item on arctic sea ice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioIce Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed periods.

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), the arctic sea ice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoIce Data Center (NSIDC), the arctic sea ice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoice extent for July 2012 was the second lowest in the satellite record behind 2011; the ice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite recoice extent recorded for August 1st of 6.5 million square kilometers is the lowest in the satellite record.

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2012 arctic sea ice extent for the June report (based on May data).

For his early forecast of the September 2015 sea ice extent, Bosse used two variables: The Heat Content of the arctic ocean northward 65 deg.

The Sea Ice Outlook is not a formal consensus forecast or prediction for arctic sea ice extent, nor is it intended as a replacement for existing efforts or centers with operational responsibiliIce Outlook is not a formal consensus forecast or prediction for arctic sea ice extent, nor is it intended as a replacement for existing efforts or centers with operational responsibiliice extent, nor is it intended as a replacement for existing efforts or centers with operational responsibility.

Distributions of Outlook estimates for September 2010 arctic sea ice extent for the July report (based on June data).

The average arctic sea ice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometeice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometeIce Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilometers.

With 19 total responses, 14 provided a value for the arctic sea ice minimum extent for September 2008; 6 provided regional outlooks.

The May Sea Ice Outlook report for the September 2008 sea ice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science communiIce Outlook report for the September 2008 sea ice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science communiice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science community.

So, yes, scientists are very much able to make a meaningful case for such data, and they do so quite lucidly in the IPCC assessments and in the NSICD's annual arctic ice extent reports.

I just looked at the NSIDC page and there's an historical graph for the extent of arctic ice but not one for Antarctica ice extent?

Bosse (Citizen Scientist / Public), 4.1 (± 0.43), Statistical (Same as June) Just as in the two years before I calculate the value for the September - minimum of the arctic sea ice extent of the year n (NSIDC monthly mean for September) from the Ocean Heat Content (0... 700m depth) northward 65 ° N during JJAS of the year n - 1.

The outlook for arctic sea ice for September 2009, based on June data, indicates a continuation of low pan-arctic sea ice extent and no indication that a return to historical levels will occur.

Furthermore you use that interpretation to push the claim that temperatures for most of the holocene were warming than now which can hardly be supported by evidence of say arctic ice extent, glacial retreat levels etc, never mind other proxies.

We received 21 responses with a range of estimates from 4.0 to 5.0 million square kilometers for the September 2012 arctic mean sea ice extent (Figure 1).

With polar sea ice [not polar ice caps] for about 30 years we have been fairly accurately measuring it, and in arctic it has significantly decreased, 2007 and 2012 were lowest ice extent during summer.

Hi iceman, Sorry for the tardy reply, that pesky real life thing again...:) The reason there is so little excitement about the record high sea ice extent in the antarctic (aside from it having no appealing potential victims, like polar bears) versus the record low arctic sea ice is probably because the southern record is only a matter of 2 % anamoly, whereas in the north we are now looking at levels over 40 % below average.

According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), arctic sea ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 19Ice Data Center (NSIDC), arctic sea ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 19ice extent for June 2011 was the second lowest in the satellite data record since 1979.

Again it is important to remember that the Outlook values are for the mean arctic September sea ice extent as provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDice extent as provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDIce Data Center (NSIDC).

We received 21 responses for the Pan-Arctic report (Figure 1), with estimates in the range of just below 4.0 million square kilometers to as high as 5.4 million square kilometers for the September arctic mean sea ice extent.