Sentences with phrase «arctic ice extent from»

Show me someone who has successfully determined arctic ice extent from weather data alone.

Yet funny how that can't be contemplated: but a far more geologically radical alteration in arctic ice extent from a larger increase in arctic temperature changes and other factors, is so easily perceived and, taken as truth, even.

It's easy to get daily up - to - date data on arctic ice extent from JAXA, and on arctic ice area from cryosphere today.

Not exact matches

The rise of CO2 from 270ppm to now over 400ppm, the extent of equatorial and sub tropical deforestation, the soot deposits on the polar ice caps, the increase in atmospheric water vapour due to a corresponding increase in ocean temps and changes in ocean currents, the extreme ice albedo currently happening in the arctic etc, etc are all conspiring in tandem to alter the climate as we know it.

Stroeve, J., V. Kattsov, A. Barrett, M. Serreze, T. Pavlova, M. Holland, and W. N. Meier (2012), Trends in arctic sea ice extent from CMIP5, CMIP3 and observations, Geophys.

I have downloaded the HADISST ice data and computed sea ice extent for both the arctic and antarctic (based on 15 % concentration to be consistent with NSIDC data from the satellite era).

A good point as arctic regions that are hit with warmer water streams will prevent sea ice extent while those with colder ones can massivly increase in volume when the air is cold enough though no growth would be visible from the top down view.

The July Outlook for arctic sea ice extent in September 2010 shows some notable adjustments from the June Outlook, with both downward and upward revisions from last month.

THERE HAS BEEN A WARMING TREND FROM THE 70s THRU THE LATE 90s,... accompanied by other changes tied to a warming trend (record low arctic sea ice extent & thickness, retreating glaciers, retreating snow lines, warming ocean surface temps, increases in sea height, de-alkalinizing oceans).

Can't find a recent item on arctic sea ice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioice but hoped it might be worth pointing out Peng et al Sensitivity Analysis of Arctic Sea Ice Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed perioIce Extent Trends and Statistical Projections Using Satellite Data http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/10/2/230/htm «The most persistently probable curve - fit model from all the methods examined appears to be Gompertz, even if it is not the best of the subset for all analyzed periods.

Historical arctic sea ice extents from NSIDC.

Figure is based on daily arctic sea ice extent from passive microwave satellite data (SSM / I).

The May Sea Ice Outlook report for the September 2008 sea ice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science communiIce Outlook report for the September 2008 sea ice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science communiice extent is based on a synthesis of 19 individual outlooks from the international arctic science community.

Bosse (Citizen Scientist / Public), 4.1 (± 0.43), Statistical (Same as June) Just as in the two years before I calculate the value for the September - minimum of the arctic sea ice extent of the year n (NSIDC monthly mean for September) from the Ocean Heat Content (0... 700m depth) northward 65 ° N during JJAS of the year n - 1.

We are developing a new dataset of september arctic sea ice extent from 1935 to present day.

There is the Cryosphere data from the University of Illinois which show arctic and Antarctic ice concentration and extent (this is not Mr. Watts data, it is satellite data.

We received 21 responses with a range of estimates from 4.0 to 5.0 million square kilometers for the September 2012 arctic mean sea ice extent (Figure 1).

Hi iceman, Sorry for the tardy reply, that pesky real life thing again...:) The reason there is so little excitement about the record high sea ice extent in the antarctic (aside from it having no appealing potential victims, like polar bears) versus the record low arctic sea ice is probably because the southern record is only a matter of 2 % anamoly, whereas in the north we are now looking at levels over 40 % below average.

The study looked at arctic - wide changes in ice age as well as regional changes and noted that the fraction of total ice extent made up of multiyear ice in March decreased from 75 % in the mid 1980s to 45 % in 2011.