Sentences with phrase «are all false doctrines»

this «beautiful piece of work» is false doctrine by a false teacher — an apostate... it neglects to lay out the requirement and that is submission to Jesus Christ.

Therefore theirs is a false doctrine.

I mean, I have a very liberal approach to life in general, but I fear the Lord enough to stay away from preaching something that might be a false doctrine.

The trinity is a false doctrine invented by the «church / government» at the council of Nicea in 325 AD so that the pagans would feel more comfortable allowing the church into their system.

These statements are all false doctrines not supported by Scripture.

Decision Theology is false doctrine.

It is false doctrine... Mark 8..

Once someone on here sets him or herself up as the arbiter of what is true and what is false doctrine, and what is the correct method of interpreting the Bible, it's time to get on bus, Gus; make a new plan, Sam; just get oneself free.

It seems that saying God is the author of sin and evil contradicts the most fundamental tenants of the Bible, and can on that basis be seen to be a false doctrine.

I was pleased to see that in the notes on Matthew 7:16 - 20, the reader is informed that the bad fruit in question is the false doctrine of the false teachers.

Not exact matches

(read YOUR Bible - maybe you missed that) Judging and condemnation are part of the false doctrine (Mark 8 - the leaven of the Pharisees) that Jesus told you to avoid.

Catholics are losing big membership due to false teaching, bad doctrine, and idolatry.

But one must also understand the ignorance of man like yourself, who has been mislead by false doctrines about God and have been blinded from the truth.

When «evangelicals» get into politics, their hypocrisy and false doctrine is inevitably exposed, and they bear no fruit in spreading the true Gospel.

So the Michigan preacher is not preaching false doctrine.

So many preachers are preaching false doctrine that it seems trifling to focus on this particular preacher.

Before this happens, there will be a «great falling away» from the faith because false science (evolution) along with false doctrines (esp dualism) will fall, thus leaving the truth — Christ and His coming Kingdom which is «not of this world».

The Reformation introduce a wave of man - made false doctrine (the most degenerate of all being Calvinism - TULIP) It is IMPOSSIBLE to be in a church and practice Christian faith.

Like I was saying, cherry - picking interpretations that conflict with the overarching comprehensive purpose of the Bible are a sure sign of false doctrine coming from fallen minds, even if it comes from someone professing to be «Christian».

When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, can not be trusted in science.

There may be a few exceptions, but most believers who avoid meeting with other believers will eventually weaken in their walk of faith and are susceptible to false doctrine.

And especially after the Noachian Flood, did false religion take a leap, with false religious doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment of a clergy class, the teaching of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification of God's name of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.

Considering that it took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that doctrine, and that the oldest known copt of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full of false doctrine to begin with?

So to have someone who can finally speak from experience and explain to me that most of them don't understand their own doctrine, but it's still not an excuse because it's a damaging and false doctrine that the Bible clearly contradicts — is incredibly helpful and healing to my soul.

«Something» inside... dare I say the Holy Spirit (still praying and would never want to say something is a revelation from God and it is not) is leading me to think it is a «big deal» and that these people whom I love are being led astray and spewing false doctrine that appeals to their own prideful proclivities and demeans others in the process.

But anyway, I myself struggle with the same question you asked about pastors who know and embrace the full implications of Calvinism, and I have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one who teaches False Doctrine and who is dangerous because of it.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

Scripture is full of warnings of the dangers and consequences of false doctrine.

As a sidebar here and for my earlier responses about unfair grouping of all believers with promoters of false doctrine, I should mention that Jesus warned us to strive to enter His Kingdom through the narrow gate, because the many who claim to serve Him and come to the wide and easy gate will be turned away.

I get that someone who has messed up their marriage might be your friend and ministry associate, and that you might want to give them the benefit of the doubt and believe them... But when they invent a false doctrine of spiritual versus legal marriage, surely some kind of red flag has to go up?

It brings to light the tangled hierarchy in their doctrine and shows what their beliefs actually mean using only the logical quantifiers of propositional calculus, that either (Mormonism is FALSE or Women are DAMNED).

We can no longer allow the corruption of scripture to be used to justify abusive and horribly damaging false doctrine to be taught.

I am saying that your false and slanderous accusation of «give someone a doctrine», you pulled out or your God rejecting self willed basket of ways to assault the Word of God.

It is demonstrably false historically: There is constant material change through the history of doctrine.

False doctrine is what all religions claim other religions teach.

«The blame can not be laid at the door of those who are seeking to be faithful, who are saying «look we want to be an Episcopal Church, we believe in bishops, but we believe in biblical bishops who hold to sound doctrine and publically refute false doctrine and false behaviour.»

All bishops are accused of failing to «teach sound doctrine and the refusal to refute, publicly, false teaching and practice».

Wills» Syllabus errorum leaves virtually no room for what used to be the liberal understanding of the development of Catholic doctrine; as Wills surely understands, false doctrines are not said to «develop.»

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

At the very least this is a call to church discipline; at most a command to keep away from everyone who's doctrine is false.

fundamentalists working in Guatemala agree with Swaggart that Catholicism is a false cult» and the «doctrine of devils.»

Jesus knew that there would be false predictions, false prophets, false doctrines.

Credence must be given to the writer in one area though in that Christendom has failed in some ways to properly «speak» or represent Christ from their pulpits and daily walk; some spew out false doctrine and self - serving «religiosity» that one can not be surprised that the Enemy (Satan) is now using those same words and actions to accuse them through writers such as we see here.

But as mentioned i'm increasingly seeing a widespread convergence of lies, deceit and false doctrine (both rational and empirical) across politics, media and entertainment, economic and even academic.

Every faith and religion upon earth that do not follow the Apostle's Doctrine is false and of the devil and is bound for the lake.

They are two sides to the same coin of false doctrine.

Sadly, Christendom and it's churches have been teaching false doctrine for century's.

The Jehovah Witness religion is false and accursed because they do not follow the Apostle's Doctrine.

Thus it is that we can question whether doctrine is right or wrong, true or false, in a way that is quite different from the way we might question somebody's faith.

This is all condoned under a false view of Jefferson's so - called «wall of separation» doctrine.