Sentences with phrase «are creating evil»

On the video below, I talk about how we are creating evil bots for single - player mode.

Paradoxically then, human beings create evil, but God can «make good use of evil.»

Not exact matches

«But I didn't feel like I was evil because I was trying to earn a living and create stores better than the co-op.

The carry trade, derivatives and massive injections of money created out of thin air are but nails in our coffins and if we do not stop these evil people it will mean destruction.

Politicians have used religion to advance their claims to just wars but in truth, they are not religious conflicts, just a facade created by atheists to avoid blame for the evil they cause.

a) that the bible is an imperfect human representation of gods word b) that the bible is a mixture of mythology and divine inspiration c) that the bible was created in a way that people would understand at the time and intended to be updated d) that a pure message was corrupted intentionally by evil humans or spirits

Wouldn't a god who admits to creating evil, have to be evil?

I see the image of God in man through mans ability to form unseen thoughts into reality creating works of never ending wonder in the presence of evil that seeks only to destroy that which is good.

True, where humans are involved, we see a reflection of good and evil in how we can create Babel towers out of a lot of things.

What kind of azzhole of created being would be so ungrateful to the one who created him, to rebel and denounce his creator, and then call Him evil when He demands justice?

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

If Warfield is not concerned with Catholicism, then why in his discussion of the kind of «faith healing» promoted by men like A. J. Gordon does he claim that it creates a class of «professionals» who stand between the soul and God and that «from this germ the whole sacerdotal evil has grown»?

As creatures created inherently inferior from a male's rib to server males» needs, but who are evil to core for forcing Original sin on humanity and forever barring us from Eden.

I would have liked it to be only one choice instead of creating evil so we could die.

That is an evil God, just because He created us doesn't mean we are His play things to torture at a whim.

Now if God can create any possible world — i.e., if one affirms «I» omnipotence — then it seems clearly to follow that no evil state of affairs in the actual world is genuine.

That is, while Griffin acknowledges that Plantinga affirms limitations on God's power in relation to possible worlds containing free human beings, he believes Plantinga to hold «that an actual world devoid of beings with some power of self - determination would be possible» and thus that God could have created a world containing no evil simply by creating a world containing no self - determined beings (GPE 271).

Some classical theists are now saying that natural evils — such as famines, floods, and earthquakes — are due to the constraints of any created world, not to acts of divine intervention.

God is not evil, nor does he create evil.

But if (5) is true, then it appears that God could have created a world inhabited by free creatures who perform moral good but no moral evil.

In short, if those dissatisfied with the classical account of nonmoral evil currently under discussion are not able to present a better world, «the (classical) theist does not have to show that it was impossible for God to create a better set of world - constituents or natural laws, or even that this is the best of all possible worlds» (IPQ 179 - 98).

Your God created evil and hell, it is not all love and goodness.

If your good is «good» and the definition means anything, then evil ALWAYS existed, and your god did not create Reality, now did he.

(11) Accordingly, it is possible that it was not within God's power to create a world containing moral good but no moral evil — i.e., (3) is possible (NN 184 - 89).

Free will is what creates evil.

Although my life (as I knew it) was destroyed by egos creating evil in my life, the blessings were / are that I'm closer to God than ever.

Hence, only the first interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).

I consider that men DID create and write the bible, but both Christ and satan are metaphors... christ is the metaphor for the potential good in a person, satan the metaphor for the potential of bad or evil... given that this is MY definition, and makes much more sense that most other beleifs, then the bible WAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writeWAS written by satan, or rather it was inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writewas inspired by the bad / evil side of the minds of the writers.

Mahatma Gandhi's famous strategy for creating an awareness of the evil of the colonial rule was the call to boycott foreign - made clothes and to wear clothes made from home - spun materials.

Since man has been created free to choose between good and evil, he will be rewarded or punished on Doomsday according to what he has chosen.

In addition to recognizing common grace, Calvinism acknowledges the reality of a «common curse,» said Carter, in that «man is fallen, man has a bent toward evil, and man is not capable of creating utopia on his own.»

In this kind of theodicy Gethesemane, the cross, and the resurrection are important foci for understanding the depths of God's love, who, in creating an unimaginatively complex matrix of matter eventuating finally in persons able to choose to go against God's intentions, nonetheless grieves for and suffers with this beloved creation, both in the pain its natural course brings all its creatures and in the evil that its human creatures inflict upon it.

Evil is not something to be created... evil is like darkness... as darkness is absence of ligEvil is not something to be created... evil is like darkness... as darkness is absence of ligevil is like darkness... as darkness is absence of light..

There are but two methods of providing against this evil: the one by creating a will in the community independent of the majority, that is, of the society itself; the other, by comprehending in the society so many separate descriptions of citizens as will render an unjust combination of a majority of the whole very improbable, if not impracticable.»

Not to mention every verse in the Bible that asserts that God is in control of the universe, that he is the one who is responsible for unbelief as well as belief, that he created both good AND EVIL, would be wrong, meaning the Bible would be fallible, meaning that the validity of everything else inside it would be called into question as well.

It is quite clear that if Allah wanted to He would have created man wholly good and completely ignorant of all evil.

«that he created both good AND EVIL» — the Bible never says that he created evil; it says that he created all things and that He declared such creation to be good; evil, however, never needed to be created, just like void doesn't need to be created; they are both the absence of somethEVIL» — the Bible never says that he created evil; it says that he created all things and that He declared such creation to be good; evil, however, never needed to be created, just like void doesn't need to be created; they are both the absence of somethevil; it says that he created all things and that He declared such creation to be good; evil, however, never needed to be created, just like void doesn't need to be created; they are both the absence of somethevil, however, never needed to be created, just like void doesn't need to be created; they are both the absence of something.

Lem me see here, according to your holy book your God personally ordered more infant killings than all American abortion doctors combined, ordered the annihilation of half a dozen civilizations, routinely taunted and tortured humanity, introduced evil into the world then blamed the things he created for it (even though he's supposed to be omniscient and omnipotent), then abandoned humanity for at least a couple thousand years while making plans to come back and slaughter 2/3 of Earth's inhabitants so that he can judge them and throw most of them into a torturous hell for all of eternity... for not being able to overcome the nature your book says he gave them... Just so he can have non-free will - having cloud gnomes sing his praises for eternity.

According to Noddings, history (including philosophy, theology, politics, societal structures) up to this point has obscured the nature of the problem of evil because all systems for dealing with it have been created, elaborated, and promoted by and for males.

It is a redemption not from the evil, but of the evil, as the power which God created for his service and for the performance of his work.

The temptation that led to this sin as well as to the other evil in the created order is to be explained by the previous rebellion of angels.

If there is free will in Heaven but no evil, that goes to show that God can in fact create worlds with both free will and no evil.

I think scripture is a rich metaphor created by human in an attempt to understand the presence of evil in the world, as well as to express their hope that it will end.

I get the idea that maybe God created me to be bothered by evil like that, even when it's said to have been orchestrated by God.»

But it was the Father's will to redeem humanity from slavery to evil and eternal corruption, and precisely for the sake of His Son in whom humankind was created and called to become co-sharers of the Divine Nature.

Your god created everything including «evil», supposedly with the full knowledge of the consequences... so what you are in effect saying, is god wanted the holocaust to happen, since we would gain some small knowledge because of it.

There is in Isaiah the puzzling verse, «I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the Lord do all these things».

First, if you are trying to say that evil serves a purpose for god it seems to me you are implying he created it... or it is a happy accident that we / satan created something so useful.

A God who creates humans who by definition must be evil because t hey are not God.

If God is saying that He creates spiritual evil, why does He juxtapose it with temporal prosperity, which is not at ALL its antithesis?