Sentences with phrase «are presented in table»

Means, standard deviation and correlations for the variables considered in the study are presented in Table 2.

Means and Standard Errors for Study Measures (except the MEI - revised subscales, which are presented in Table 3)

Mean participant characteristics are presented in Table 1.

The results of ANOVA conducted in order to analyse the effects of parents» group and gender on family functioning, parenting stress and QoL are presented in Table 3.

Intercorrelations among child social skills and predictor variables are presented in Table 2.

Predictors of incident infection are presented in Table 3.

Detailed baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.

The results are presented in Table IV.

The results of the multivariate GLM models are presented in Table 2.

Regarding the perceived family support, the results are presented in table 4.

Correlations between the predictor variables are presented in Table 2.

These data are presented in Table 3.

The results from this step are presented in Table II.

As with the previous set of regressions, estimates from the final step are presented in Table III, whereas main effect estimates from step of initial entry are presented in the text.

Conduct disorder symptoms at intake, although significant predictors of all 3 substance disorders, were no longer significantly associated with any substance disorders once CD symptoms by the age - 14 follow - up were included; thus, only ORs associated with CD by the age - 14 follow - up are presented in Table 2.

Correlation analyses examining the relations amongst study variables are presented in Table II.

Results of the analyses of the relationship among indicators of psychosocial adjustment and bullying / being bullied using the proportional odds model are presented in Table 4a.

The results are presented in Table 3.

The socio - demographic characteristics of the selected sample are presented in Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the study variables are presented in Table 1.

Findings of our resulting final model (χ2 = 133.03, df = 110, p =.07, RMSEA =.08, CFI =.92, TLI =.92) are presented in Table 2 and Figure 1.

Scale items and internal consistency of the scales are presented in Table 1.

However, an inspection of the scree plot indicated that a three - factor solution would provide a best fit for the data, as inflexions justified the removal of components 4, 5, 6, and 7; retained factors are presented in Table 1.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are presented in table 1.

Participant characteristics are presented in table 2.

Means and standard deviations of the ULS - 6 items are presented in Table 1.

Criteria used to evaluate the appropriateness of a study are presented in Table 1.

The mean number of activities that the teachers in intervention Type I and Type II reported implementing in full, in part and omitting are presented in Table III.

The mean values for the intervention and control groups» subscale scores at pre -, post-intervention and 12 - month follow - up are presented in Table IV.

Finally, a simple linear regression was performed in order to examine whether self - compassion can significantly predict positive affect and the results are presented in Table 3 below.

What is more, the correlations between them were analyzed in order to check for variables» inter-correlations indicating that correlations were generally within the small to medium range and they are presented in Table 1.

The results of the hierarchical regression analysis are presented in table 5.

The characteristics of the victims in relation to PTSD symptoms are presented in table 2.

Descriptive statistics for child and social / environmental characteristics of the nonsmoking adolescents at baseline (N = 5829) are presented in Table 1.

The component loadings are presented in Table 4.

Factor loadings (where applicable), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, ordinal alpha), as well as the scale and item means and standard deviations are presented in Table 2.

Findings from these tests are presented in Table 5 and indicated that all indirect paths were significant.

Factor correlations are presented in Table 5.

The kinds of things found to be protective of children's mental health are presented in the table to the right.

Mean pain ratings and mean values for N1, N2 and P2 local peak amplitude (LPA; µV) and local peak latency (LPL; ms) are presented in Table 1.

Descriptive characteristics of the study cohort according to medical benefit receipt are presented in table 1 (table including unemployment benefits available as online supplementary table S3 in Appendix).

The relative contributions of significant demographic, child and carer health factors after adjusting for all other factors in the model are presented in table 3.

The range of scores with the mean and standard deviation for the PSC, CBCL Total, and CBCL Internalizing and Externalizing scales are presented in Table 2.

The main effects of maltreatment are presented in Table 1.

The associations of the ACE score to childhood / adolescent or adult suicide attempts are presented in Table 4.

The characteristics of the studies included are presented in table 2.

The distributions of the childhood measures for men and women within each of the cohorts are presented in table 2.

Participant sociodemographic characteristics are presented in Table 1.

The distributions of adult health outcomes for men and women within each of the NCDS and BCS cohorts are presented in table 1, with some notable differences in the prevalence of each outcome according to cohort and gender.

Uncertainties are presented in Table S4