Sentences with phrase «are presented with facts»

When they are presented with facts about drivers in the state, though, they usually change their minds.

You are presented with facts (i.e., the Nature paper) and your blase reply is simply «I stand by all my comments».

Whenever you are presented with facts you either dismiss them or answer showing yourself to be out of your depth.

I love how Mormons freeze in their tracks and their eyes roll back into their heads when they are presented with facts.

Studies shows that when people are presented with facts and figures, smaller areas of the brain are activated which indicates that information is being processed.

Because no matter how many times you have been presented with facts on top of facts, you can't fathom a world where the defense did enough to win the game against PIT on Sunday.

Living in the wilds of Northern Idaho, I am presented with the fact that my chances of meeting Hugh are very slim... so I live vicariously through others on the internet.

Not exact matches

«We are disappointed by the fact that such serious claims have been made publicly, without any proof being presented and without any attempt by the United Kingdom to clarify the situation with the Russian side in the first place.»

'' [It] promises to teach readers how to make sense of a complex world, taking a critical view of the facts, figures, and statistics we're presented with every day.

In fact, it's better to be present on just a few platforms and use them well rather than to be on all platforms with sub-par offerings.

Trusting your gut is a matter of looking at decisions from every possible angle, and when the facts don't present a clear alternative, you believe in your ability to choose; you go with what looks and feels right.

For instance, they attributed personal and logical failings to those who disagreed with them that weren't actual present (i.e., they said «this guy is an arrogant, uninformed jerk» when, in fact, the author showed no signs of being arrogant or ill informed).

We can't find any similar campaign matching the text of the «unprecedented regulatory power» comments; that fact, combined with the evidence presented by ZDNet, suggests these anti-net neutrality comments aren't coming from the people whose names are attached to them.»

As I watched little people tackle the challenges presented to them with pure enthusiasm and creativity, I was struck by the fact that children are natural engineers.

«In fact there was no evidence presented that since his brother's arrest, Mr. Zachary Cruz has threatened anyone, has ever exhibited or shown violence toward anyone, or that he has been seen by anyone with a weapon.»

If we assume that hysteresis is in fact present to some degree after deep recessions, the natural next question is to ask whether it might be possible to reverse these adverse supply - side effects by temporarily running a «high - pressure economy,» with robust aggregate demand and a tight labor market.

Since the major financial institutions which comprise the financial system are still way overleveraged and opaque (in fact with record amounts of debt and derivatives at present), such a break in confidence could happen abruptly and without warning.»

Not many ex-Communists in fact posed this question, because to do so would be to undermine the presupposition that binds Marxism with all modern forms of moral calculation; «the utilitarian attention to consequences rather than to actions themselves is liable to lead to a continuous evaluation of the present only as it leads on to some future.»

The only problem is science eventually caught up with them and presented it's own facts.

Picking a position, or coming to a conclusion, because the facts you're presented with point towards that conclusion is not «giving up».

But you are wrong, champ, I have in fact read the bible and if you could suss out where I mentioned that a bible, in its content (a.k.a. all the sh.it you quoted at me) can say that its true all it wants, but to make something non-fiction, the author, at the beginning and the end usually has a forward and an appendix with multiple sources to back up the material its presenting.

I care b / c I think that education with the facts as they have been presented to us in the modern age are vital to ensuring we continue to evolve and stop stay stuck in the dark ages where religion was used to control the masses.

When Jesus said, «The poor will always be with you...» he sort of disproved the author's next myth in his next phrase «but me you will not always have,» referring to the fact that he would not be physically present in just a few months (though he would send the Holy Spirit).

But if we choose to believe something and present that belief as scientific and factual when in fact it is not, we are dealing with another type of animal here.

You are merely cherry - picking facts to present a narrative that fits with your own beliefs.

For the time being, however, «The Div School,» by the very fact that its name perdures and its original purpose remains, has presented us with a serious matter both to ponder and talk about.

The best we can do as people is look at the evidence and base our beliefs on the facts that we are presented with.

Whitehead wrote, «there is no essential reason why memory should not be raised to the vividness of the present fact» (CN), but to revive the actual present of a past state, i.e., not a memory of the past but a preceding actuality, would be to hallucinate with an object - like clarity.

You don't present the facts in a way that allows a person to reason out for themselves if they are interested, you just hit them over the head with your opinion.

In short, the irreducible complexity of molecular systems is controversial among molecular biologists when it is presented as an idea with philosophical consequences, and tacitly accepted as reality when it remains in the world of innocent fact.

That does not mean only (or not primarily) that there is no foreseeable end to the program — a fact which, in view of what we are at present presented with, admittedly makes a certain hostility to the media understandable.

Dasein «has a past» not by being located at the expanding edge of a field of «facts» with which it entertains «relations» (prehensions), which makes the past external and the present related to it in a time - like way (i.e., as «coming after» it, in sequence with it), but by itself ecstatically opening the very «having - been - ness» (Gewesenheit.

If you want to have a serious debate, you'll have to start engaging with the facts and arguments that have been presented rather than merely ignoring them and restating the same old arguments that you seem so desperate to believe.

Similarly, people born into any given religious faith — Christian, Muslim, Hindu, etc, etc, etc — and who are immersed in that faith, and surrounded by people of that faith, all of their lives — and especially their childhood — can't be expected to suddenly cast off such total indoctrination when an atheist such as myself presents them with certain facts which conflict with their world view.

Belief is not concerned with what is, that is, with things in the present, with facts, for what is present is attained by conceptualization.

Having once been an agnostic, I know most of the arguments unbelievers use, I use most of them myself... I also know for a fact that you can not argue someone into a belief in God, they have to get their on their own, with the evidence presented for Him...

I no longer have to represent my going to God as a departure from time and history.42 In fact, to attain God as the Absolute Future who is also the Fullness of Time, I must perforce be occupied with the present and the tasks of the present, for it is only in and through the present that I can advance into the future.

Verse 28, therefore, with which we are particularly concerned, must be regarded as having existed as an isolated logion before it was inserted into its present context, and since, as we have seen, the probability is that the Lukan version is nearer to the original form, we must, in fact, regard the saying as having so existed in very much the form it now has in Luke 11.20.

The capacities needed to apprehend God must be guided by interests in God's peculiar ways of being present and by God's idiosyncratic reality, not by persons» interests in realizing or fulfilling themselves; but the shaping and transforming of persons» identities this involves will in fact also bring with them movement toward fulfillment of their humanity.

Obviously, any idea of inspiration which implies equal value in the teachings of Scripture, or inerrancy in its statements, or conclusive infallibility in its ideas, is irreconcilable with such facts as this book presents.

The very fact that six historically influential ideas are presented in terms of development, with their later formulations on an altitude immeasurably higher than the lowlands from which they came, may produce the illusion of constant ascent, as though being posterior in time always meant being superior in quality.

In fact, with a view of time as negative, as source of mutability and contingency, some other way has to be found to explain time's origin in order to safeguard God's causality, by saying, e.g., that time is the measure of the degradation resulting from the fall, or that God created a metaphysical and finished universe through an instantaneous creation in which every species, was present from the beginning, instead of a world of becoming and growth.

In former times, however, the object and situation of a free human action were simply ready - made data, presented in fact with almost static fixity and repetitiveness.

In other words, an enduring creature would be confronted willynilly with the fact of its past redemption and compelled to accept it, to integrate it as part of its present determinateness in the same way as it must appropriate any other fact in its actual world....

You seem to be expecting people to abandon their religion because you are presenting them with «facts» that you are sure will stand the test of time.

As for belief, I'm absolutely fine with people saying, «My belief is such and such», However, when their beliefs are presented as facts, or as «THE TRUTH», and when questioned, they fall back on faith, that is when I have issues with it.

My emphasis is upon what Whitehead called nonconformal propositions, namely, a subject / predicate statement that does not conform to present fact, but suggests a possible future version of a fact with respect to some particular subject or subjects.

That leaves the second option, which, even if it can be defended, has not, in fact, been defended — at least not in any fashion commensurate with the present change in law and policy.

There is no lust in christ but just an infinite source of the love of the spirit that's pure and delightful.Marriage itself is a concession to the weakness of our present being.God designed woman as the companion of man with complimentary attributes.I could justify all kinds of sin through the fact that I'm bonded to them.we were slaves of sin as Paul tells us.I couldn't come out of sin with all my efforts Jeremy.We have a sinful nature.But, Sin never provides life because the spirit of god is love and life to us.When I cried out to God to save me from this nature, God did by his grace.Now, I detest sin having tasted love of christ.

The fact remains, however, that the Vichy leaders have enforced anti-Semitic laws in a more and more strict and iniquitous fashion, depriving French Jews of every governmental and cultural position, imposing upon them all kinds of restrictions with regard to liberal and commercial professions, mercilessly striking many of them who were wounded for their country during the present war, and hypocritically trying to hide a bad conscience under a pseudonational pathos in which religious and racial considerations are shamefully mixed.