Sentences with phrase «are some answers to the question everyone»

Not exact matches

Although everyone's circumstances are unique, the main question you have to answer is if you'll have enough money to retire early.

«It's not a bad technique,» Whitaker says, «But a lot of people can answer those questions «of course I would do this and I would be nice to everyone,» and a lot of people get fooled by those.»

It's essential to have everyone review the agenda in advance of the meeting to prepare a list of questions, answers or advice beside each item.

The one question the CRTC isn't asking, and that everyone would like to answer, is: «Would you be in favour of regulations requiring internet providers to increase their usage caps or eliminate them altogether?»

«You want to be sure you can answer questions and be able to help everyone who comes to your booth.»

In between tweets assuring users that it's working hard to answer everyone's questions, Xbox also offers resources such as phone numbers and common topics addressed online.

is the question everyone wants to be answered but here are some others to consider as you try to figure it all out:

«I'm going to Mexico and the United States to get one question answered that's on everyone's mind: do people want a NAFTA deal or not?»

As is my custom, I begin with a quote from the Rock «N Roll Archives: The question to everyone's answer Is usually asked from withiis my custom, I begin with a quote from the Rock «N Roll Archives: The question to everyone's answer Is usually asked from withiIs usually asked from within.

You seem to believe that you are aware of what everyone is thinking, as this is the second time you have made a sweeping blanket statement... but to answer your question: I can assure you if that woman did see an angel telling her to kill her children, it certainly would have been a fallen angel, or demon if you prefer and not from God... If you had even a basic understanding of angels and fallen angels and the protection of God, this would be a moot point... but it appears that you want to play the game of how ridiculous can I be...

David... I agree with you wholeheartedly that we need fishon's voice on here but I also think he needs to be held to the same standards as everyone else... this is supposed to be dialogue but if he's backed into a corner he comes out with a barrage of questions that are sort of related but avoids answering questions himself.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

The Hateful Truth: To answer your question as it might apply to me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt otherTo answer your question as it might apply to me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt otherto me, yes, even growing up in a Catholic household I was raised to respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt otherto respect everyone, even Satanists, as long they (or any other faith follower for that matter) did not go out to hurt otherto hurt others.

So I Listened to all of his sermons read all of his blogs and than decided to leave my number to see if he would really call as he says on his web site, With in 2 hours I recieved a call and DR. Collins never rushed me off the telephone answered all my questions, And After just that one call you can tell he loves and believes in what he does, He wont be for everyone, Because he does talk about damnation and what it takes to get to heaven, And its not from giving ministers our money > I watched the you tube videos of many and he is just for me, everyone has a choice but in listening to his sermons and reading his blogs and than the telephone call this guy is the real deal.

Just ask a simple question (its a question that everyone would agree on that the question is the exact one to ask to get the truth) and by the answer (yes or no) given by the most knowledgeable / high positioned persons of that religion, you will eliminate every religion except Christianity.

If everyone is so sure of his existence, why then do no two of you have the same answers to questions of his legitimacy.

In order to answer such questions we must remember that the insight into the unreality of everything that exists — even the Buddhas, the beings who belong to them, and the Teaching are illusory — is not intended for everyone.

Everyone has questions Heaven and Hell but there is only one place to find the True Answers to our questions, The Holy Bible.

This practice is somewhat better, since the questions and answers benefit everyone who just heard the sermon, but often, only the bravest people will ask a question or make a comment, and sometimes, people become very long - winded when they get a microphone in their hands, and in a large - group setting, it is difficult to keep their comment from turning into a second sermon.

So fight for your dying religion if you want, but expect that there will always be an Atheist out there who will stand up for what's real, correct your mistakes, and present actual facts... Get used to it, or go back to church where the answer to any question is always Jesus, and everyone else agrees.

Truthfully, I am not sure I will have good, clear answers to these questions which will satisfy everyone.

On a side note: To everyone who asked about Pascal's Wager, you could've answered your own question by Googling «Pascal's Wager,» going to the first link (Wikipedia), and reading the article:) That's the case with a lot of Christian «arguments for god.&raquTo everyone who asked about Pascal's Wager, you could've answered your own question by Googling «Pascal's Wager,» going to the first link (Wikipedia), and reading the article:) That's the case with a lot of Christian «arguments for god.&raquto the first link (Wikipedia), and reading the article:) That's the case with a lot of Christian «arguments for god.»

Yes you're right, but everyone is so upset because Graham said the obvious when he was made to answer a question.

I'm sure everyone would have a different answer to that question but it's taken us about nine months each time.

I'm just trying to answer questions and make it easier for everyone.

let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the case he should never be in charge of making personnel decisions... buying late in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)

«I am not in a very good mood to answer any silly questions,» said Rigney, after keeping everyone out of the locker room for 20 minutes.

For some reason, most of the representatives from the various red tops and Sunday papers in attendance chose to ask the Chelsea star questions that everyone already had answers to, «What's Chelsea like?»

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The simple answers to all these questions are within everyone who know anything about football..

Manchester United Tickets hold the answers to the questions that everyone has been asking.

Well, if you believe everyone from ESPN to Football Italia, Roma are willing to answer that question, as they've reportedly shown interest and / or possibly contacted United about a loan move for young Memphis, with a possible option to buy.

I don't disagree with that, but that doesn't answer an essential question: who should become parents — everyone, or only those who can prove themselves able to fully take on the responsibilities, regardless if they're married, single, divorced, gay, straight or polyamorous?

Hi everyone — I wanted to answer a few questions / concerns that were raised by the folks above.

I would like to meet them before hand and answer any questions they may have to ensure everyone is on board with your positive birth experience.

Of COURSE that wasn't the time to lay it all out, but to skirt to the question or give a vague answer would have been far more appropriate than removing her of all guilt - she'll probably never ask again AND tell everyone «I was told by an expert that this didn't happen because of our home birth.»

P.S. I think everyone else has basically answered your question, so I won't be redundant; I just wanted to share my experience with the situation at hand.

Advice section a little hard to find answers to everyone «s questions.

She was their for us the entire time, whether it be a phone call to answer a question for concern or just to check in to see how everyone was doing.

«If it wasn't for everyone at WIC staying up late answering questions and helping me get through six months of thrush, I probably would have never made it to 20 months with my son.

AG Andrew Cuomo told reporters today that he is talking «on an ongoing basis» to «many of the parties» involved in the budget battle, giving «advice» and answering legal questions and generally «talking to everyone at every level.»

Your questions were getting downvoted and flagged (even spam flagged), and merging them was the simplest solution to a) calm everyone down and b) having at least part of your question answered.

The challenge: to answer the question on everyone's lips: «What is Mayism?»

In answer to the question «how should «worker» status be defined», LITRG suggested to BEIS that everyone be given «worker» status unless it can be shown that they are genuinely self - employed.

Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg said at the time: «I very much hope that when those questions are answered there will be an opportunity for him to rejoin the government, because, as everyone has seen in recent weeks, he has so much to contribute to national life.»

«We're working that through now with both houses and we're having conversations to see if we can come up with an agreement that satisifies everyone, including the courts,» Cuomo said during a Red Room question and answer session.

He said the office currently works to make sure everyone's questions are answered and works well with the Building Department.

Then neuroscience will be in a much better position to answer the age - old questions that have fascinated everyone from oracles and shamans to Freud and, more recently, science - fiction enthusiasts: Why do we dream, and what do dreams mean?

Several readers have written in to answer Feedback's question at the end of our item on a toilet seat that warns you if it is up or down (2 April): «Why doesn't everyone else just switch on the bathroom light?»

I was very available to everyone before I started trying to have a baby, and I have purposely tried to remain available — despite how difficult it can be at times to hear the news, see the photos, answer the questions, and buy a baby gift from a registry.