Sentences with phrase «argue a point about»

Then articles on achieving good nutrition don't have to argue a point about how many «carbs» need to be included.

However, I will argue the point about OWS and it's costs.

I am not arguing the point about invasive species being misrepresented or not, but thought I would point out one example quite reasonably associated with GW, and that is the severe outbreak of pine beetle in BC due to successive mild winters.

Do you really not understand that current costs of wind and solar are utterly irrelevant — and that I am not about to argue any point about current wind and solar technologies because it is utterly irrelevant to the point I was making.

Not going to argue a point about whether Oracle salesmen have been known to verbally jack off, thats a Bear - Catholic, Pope - craps - in - woods scenario...: --RRB-

Although the paragraph on family stability was not large, it was the first time that the reader got a sense that the author was arguing a point about the cause of depression in children.

Not exact matches

The point here is simply to acknowledge what many have argued about the whole idea of «post-truth» - it's not anything new, but just more of the same.

But senior State Department officials expressed concerns about those talking points, arguing that they made it seem like the State Department had ignored CIA warnings.

Prior to the market correction, which has reduced Tesla's 2018 gain to about 3 % ahead of earnings, there was no real major dip, so you could argue that the staggering losses and the capital obliteration — over $ 1 billion per quarter at his point — are, well, somehow rationally priced in.

Law professor Eugene Volokh, who blogs about free speech issues at the Washington Post, has made the same point in the past to argue that Google's (GOOG) choice of search results are a form of free speech.

Snap will undoubtedly point to its millennial reach and those much - talked - about engagement numbers as a way of arguing that it is more valuable.

While a lot of the experts hem and haw about this option and consider it less desirable than transferring your points to travel partners, I would argue that the Chase Ultimate Rewards travel portal has its own share of gems.

In a recent article in National Review, the conservative news magazine founded by William F. Buckley in 1955, columnist Kevin D. Williamson takes a hardline stance, arguing that Trump's 15 percent tax is «about 15 points too high.»

There are borderline sexual assault scenarios that are viewed as standard procedure by much of the PUA crowd — this is clearly not the place to argue that but I feel it'd be wrong not to point out my disagreement with that point — but above and beyond all that are incredibly dehumanizing assumptions about both men and women that underly the process.

That's a good point, our government is racking up debt faster than locust on a wheat field, and we're arguing about gay - marriage, race and still abortion issues.

I'm sure of what I believe in and if you don't agree, it's ok, I won't argue about it, I'm just sharing my point of view.

But amazingly the fact that some said it rested on the back of a turtle did not make it fact, as I was pointing out, just arguing about God's existence is not proof of that existence.

The movie served to give me a different platform to discuss faith from, not to argue that my belief system is right and someone else's is wrong, but instead to point out that the world is hungry for questions about the soul and what we don't see right in front of us.

I'll leave the first point for someone else to argue, but the one about a continuum is surprisingly rare.

As long as we Christians keep arguing about words, we are missing the entire point of the teachings of Jesus... and we should go immerse ourselves in His teachings some more.

I have yet to meet anyone who claims to have been convinced that what the Bible says is true, or who claims to have been convinced about the correctness of a particular interpretation of any Biblical passage by someone who wanted to argue those points.

Yes, we disagree on what his mission was, or what it all means from a cosmological perspective, but that doesn't mean we have to argue about those points.

He argues that this theory allows one to make all the points that can be made about theological changes through history by using Robinson s notion of «trajectories,» but without its postulation of some «essence» of meaning that perdures through the change.

The people who simply wanted to argue about anything and everything would have stoned her to make a point, except for one thing: Jesus asked each one to judge himself before he judged her.

If you engage with the point I have made about arguing from authority, then I will consider your commendation.

Must be nice to argue points that no one else is talking about.

This second point is important because the two issues are usually treated separately» as if what one argued about relations between members of the same sex was quite different from what one might argue about relations between people of different sexes.

There's no point in us arguing about it I think.

I would argue about the holes in his theory but whats the point.

Romney has taken the time to inform himself about the issues to the point that he can argue both sides of any issue better than most of his Republican opponents can argue any side of anything.

Contradicted tenets that allow the fundamental to argue whatever point they want, including war, from their little book, because just about all points of view and «sides» are represented there.

The leaders of Judaism had dozens if not hundreds of definitions about what was» work «on the Sabbath Day and completely missed the point (Jesus said so) and here we are arguing about the definition of «drawing ``.

If you want to make a point about people not having jobs... I think you can do a better job of arguing that CNN and other groups are spending too much time concentrating on a single subject.

Steve, if you and I are quibbling about commas, then we are definitely wasting our time arguing the point.

I completely agree about the parallel with Isaiah 22:22, but I am not sure what it has to do with the point I am arguing in this post.

I don't see the point of arguing about this.

Even I, although I have argued throughout this chapter for understanding the ministry basically from a monoepiscopal point of view, have sometimes been nostalgic about the first century, where everybody seemed so keen and enthusiastic (literally filled with God) that things got done and «offices» were not established.

Point number six, of course, is stated in about a dozen different ways, with people arguing over what the actual requirement should be (repent and be baptized, confess your sins, say this prayer, etc, etc), but for the sake of this blog post, I don't really care about that.

I am not arguing the point of right or wrong about abortion.

It says a lot about you: If you can't argue on point, sling mud.

Is there any point in arguing about the skin color of fictional characters?

Now all of may look at the church now and throughout history and point out abuses that have happened, wars with the excuses being church dogma etc and argue about coming to a more enlightened place with human reasoning.

I need only to ask: if you wash your feet before prayer, and when the last stoning was that you attended: to get my point across... but you did say I had to answer in a coherent manner...:) Yes, the jesus story... one of those that many love to argue about, even me at times in my life have i taken the position of «he never existed»... but most of us know he did, the only real question is his divinity.

Furthermore, St. Paul argues the general point about there being a moral order in the universe precisely with reference to male and female homosexual practice (Rom.

(A point which I have attempted to argue in The Gospel of the Kingdom [1940]-RRB- Their interests are very largely centered upon the apostles, but at the same time the surviving tradition within them makes it clear that Jesus» influence upon the populace of Galilee resulted in «multitudes» following him about and hanging upon his words.

If you really want to agrue this point at any time to anybody then you need to know the facts on both sides so you have knowledge about what you are arguing about.

I usually point to these attributes when I'm obsessing over the edit I make on an image because it's easy for me to argue that it's not about the photo, it's about my judgement as a creative.

Your point about the 10 Commandments can be argued, but I think the 10 commandments or very flawed.

(or at least for the sake of this point being argued, the validity of the claims about homosexuality?)

When something so stupidly simple and absurdly quick costs so much, arguing about who should pay the bill misses the point.